Anonymous wrote:We are in JKLM in a 3 bd/2ba for $2300. Not the fanciest there ever was, but it works!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is really simple. If you do not live IB (look up the definition), then you are OB. You can either move IB or you can find out if there are legal ways to attend as OB. If you live OB but claim to live IB (in whatever creative way you dream up), you would be breaking the law and would have to lie every day you send your child to school. You would have to require that your child lie and would be teaching your child that lying is OK.
You could pretend that you have the moral high ground, but you wouldn't. You would just be a liar and a cheat.
You sound unhinged. My kids go to plenty of friend's houses that are clearly OOB for our JKLMM school. I never think about how they got into the school. I can assure you the kids don't seem burdened by the fact they may be lying.
Uh. Maybe they're not lying and that's why they don't seem burdened. Maybe they entered OOB legitimately.
Exactly. The unhinged poster thinks everyone is lying. Even if they are, no one has a clue or cares!
Why is it unhinged to think ans say that lying is shitty and wrong? It IS wrong. It IS bad.
If I'm taking my Kindergarten kid to a playdate at an OOB house at a school that is closed to OOB students, you'd better believe I'm turned off by that.
They're liars. They think they're better than other people; that they don't have to play by the rules. "Moving in with grandpa" is the same thing.
I get that you're doing it for your kid, but it's wrong, and it implies that you think it's ok to cheat for your family because your family is more special than other families. Believe me, you're not the only family with the issue of living in bad to so-so school district. The fact that some people choose to solve that problem by cheating is reprehensible, in my opinion. Calling this kind of judgement unhinged isn't fair, it's defensive and it is suspect.
Shut up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is really simple. If you do not live IB (look up the definition), then you are OB. You can either move IB or you can find out if there are legal ways to attend as OB. If you live OB but claim to live IB (in whatever creative way you dream up), you would be breaking the law and would have to lie every day you send your child to school. You would have to require that your child lie and would be teaching your child that lying is OK.
You could pretend that you have the moral high ground, but you wouldn't. You would just be a liar and a cheat.
You sound unhinged. My kids go to plenty of friend's houses that are clearly OOB for our JKLMM school. I never think about how they got into the school. I can assure you the kids don't seem burdened by the fact they may be lying.
Uh. Maybe they're not lying and that's why they don't seem burdened. Maybe they entered OOB legitimately.
Exactly. The unhinged poster thinks everyone is lying. Even if they are, no one has a clue or cares!
Why is it unhinged to think ans say that lying is shitty and wrong? It IS wrong. It IS bad.
If I'm taking my Kindergarten kid to a playdate at an OOB house at a school that is closed to OOB students, you'd better believe I'm turned off by that.
They're liars. They think they're better than other people; that they don't have to play by the rules. "Moving in with grandpa" is the same thing.
I get that you're doing it for your kid, but it's wrong, and it implies that you think it's ok to cheat for your family because your family is more special than other families. Believe me, you're not the only family with the issue of living in bad to so-so school district. The fact that some people choose to solve that problem by cheating is reprehensible, in my opinion. Calling this kind of judgement unhinged isn't fair, it's defensive and it is suspect.
Shut up
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is really simple. If you do not live IB (look up the definition), then you are OB. You can either move IB or you can find out if there are legal ways to attend as OB. If you live OB but claim to live IB (in whatever creative way you dream up), you would be breaking the law and would have to lie every day you send your child to school. You would have to require that your child lie and would be teaching your child that lying is OK.
You could pretend that you have the moral high ground, but you wouldn't. You would just be a liar and a cheat.
You sound unhinged. My kids go to plenty of friend's houses that are clearly OOB for our JKLMM school. I never think about how they got into the school. I can assure you the kids don't seem burdened by the fact they may be lying.
Uh. Maybe they're not lying and that's why they don't seem burdened. Maybe they entered OOB legitimately.
Exactly. The unhinged poster thinks everyone is lying. Even if they are, no one has a clue or cares!
Why is it unhinged to think ans say that lying is shitty and wrong? It IS wrong. It IS bad.
If I'm taking my Kindergarten kid to a playdate at an OOB house at a school that is closed to OOB students, you'd better believe I'm turned off by that.
They're liars. They think they're better than other people; that they don't have to play by the rules. "Moving in with grandpa" is the same thing.
I get that you're doing it for your kid, but it's wrong, and it implies that you think it's ok to cheat for your family because your family is more special than other families. Believe me, you're not the only family with the issue of living in bad to so-so school district. The fact that some people choose to solve that problem by cheating is reprehensible, in my opinion. Calling this kind of judgement unhinged isn't fair, it's defensive and it is suspect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No it's not. The crux of the issue is that I'm not sending my kid to a crap school so that a bunch of righteous a@$holes won't think I'm bad. And really- you have never used connections to get a job ect.? That's bullshit.
To me the worst part is the message you are sending to your kid and your values. I am working to make my extremely low performing school better for all kids and, if I fail, I will move to where I can afford to live and send my kid to a good school.
Not that simple if the place you can afford with good schools is a two-hour commute from your work (and some people can't change jobs). I would rather have an extra 3-4 hours a day with my children (that is 15-16 hours a week) and have them think cheating is sometimes ok then see them only on weekends and teach them cheating is always wrong.
The problem is the cost of real estate in this area.
Now this has nothing to do with me (we are in a charter), but you have to admit that "choices" in the DC area are really grim. I moved here thinking I could choose a small house or condo or TH and thereby get good schools and a short commute, but I quickly found out that a three bedroom condo that met that criteria was far beyond what we could afford (and we make a lot!). In a place where tear downs in the only good school districts sell for 700,000, we have to scramble to get what we can any way we can.
Cry me a river. Excuses, excuses, excuses. We get it. You think you're entitled to lie. Why, you couldn't live in a three bedroom otherwise!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No it's not. The crux of the issue is that I'm not sending my kid to a crap school so that a bunch of righteous a@$holes won't think I'm bad. And really- you have never used connections to get a job ect.? That's bullshit.
To me the worst part is the message you are sending to your kid and your values. I am working to make my extremely low performing school better for all kids and, if I fail, I will move to where I can afford to live and send my kid to a good school.
Not that simple if the place you can afford with good schools is a two-hour commute from your work (and some people can't change jobs). I would rather have an extra 3-4 hours a day with my children (that is 15-16 hours a week) and have them think cheating is sometimes ok then see them only on weekends and teach them cheating is always wrong.
The problem is the cost of real estate in this area.
Now this has nothing to do with me (we are in a charter), but you have to admit that "choices" in the DC area are really grim. I moved here thinking I could choose a small house or condo or TH and thereby get good schools and a short commute, but I quickly found out that a three bedroom condo that met that criteria was far beyond what we could afford (and we make a lot!). In a place where tear downs in the only good school districts sell for 700,000, we have to scramble to get what we can any way we can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the rules allow for it, like the joint custody poster above, you can go to DCPS and ask. Why do I think many people posing various themes of "I pay rent on the studio apt neither I nor my child live in" or "I pay dc taxes" are likely unwilling to go to DCPS and ask if their proposal is allowed by the rules. They know the answer, it is not. Somehow, however, they feel that they are not actually breaking the law because they have found a way to create paperwork.
If you are asking your child to lie about where she lives, you are doing something wrong and you know it. Own that you are a law breaker.
The only LAW it is breaking is your social law, of what is right and wrong. If we are paying DC taxes- we are abiding by the law. And the boundary issues- you all would jump through a million whatever hoops if we went to a city wide lottery. No sense in telling me you wouldn't because you would. The boundary fights/fierceness are throw backs when we tried to keep the black kids away from the white kids. So no, I do not feel forced to honor those at the expense of my kids education.
So you are trying to keep YOUR kids away from black kids.
Anonymous wrote:We are in JKLM in a 3 bd/2ba for $2300. Not the fanciest there ever was, but it works!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No it's not. The crux of the issue is that I'm not sending my kid to a crap school so that a bunch of righteous a@$holes won't think I'm bad. And really- you have never used connections to get a job ect.? That's bullshit.
To me the worst part is the message you are sending to your kid and your values. I am working to make my extremely low performing school better for all kids and, if I fail, I will move to where I can afford to live and send my kid to a good school.
Anonymous wrote:We are in JKLM in a 3 bd/2ba for $2300. Not the fanciest there ever was, but it works!