Anonymous wrote:Found the poll. CBS. Interesting that 10 % of Dems didn't believe O was born in US. Statistics on poll were odd. Twice as many Republicans as Dems. Lots of I's, too. Only 1100 people questioned.
Not even close. 45% of Republicans polled think Obma was not born in America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with the fact that we have still not had any birthers weighing in on Ted Cruz! They should all be posting that he is ineligible to run for President. Who cares about this meaningless little bitchfest between Jeff and some right wing asshole. I want to hear from Tea Partying birthers about Ted "Anchor Baby" Cruz! Where are you!
Birthers are a fringe element of the conservative movement, just like those on the left who think Bush and Cheney orchestrated 9/11.
What you are doing is equating all birthers with Tea Partiers and other conservatives. That's like saying that all liberals believe Bush and Cheney brought down' the towers.
Such as strange set of messages here at the end of this thread.
Not even close. 45% of Republicans polled think Obma was not born in America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with the fact that we have still not had any birthers weighing in on Ted Cruz! They should all be posting that he is ineligible to run for President. Who cares about this meaningless little bitchfest between Jeff and some right wing asshole. I want to hear from Tea Partying birthers about Ted "Anchor Baby" Cruz! Where are you!
Birthers are a fringe element of the conservative movement, just like those on the left who think Bush and Cheney orchestrated 9/11.
What you are doing is equating all birthers with Tea Partiers and other conservatives. That's like saying that all liberals believe Bush and Cheney brought down' the towers.
Such as strange set of messages here at the end of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:I am a conservative NON birther. I always thought that you had to be born on US soil and that McCain was okay because of the Canal Zone.
Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with the fact that we have still not had any birthers weighing in on Ted Cruz! They should all be posting that he is ineligible to run for President. Who cares about this meaningless little bitchfest between Jeff and some right wing asshole. I want to hear from Tea Partying birthers about Ted "Anchor Baby" Cruz! Where are you!
Anonymous wrote:What does any of this have to do with the fact that we have still not had any birthers weighing in on Ted Cruz! They should all be posting that he is ineligible to run for President. Who cares about this meaningless little bitchfest between Jeff and some right wing asshole. I want to hear from Tea Partying birthers about Ted "Anchor Baby" Cruz! Where are you!
Anonymous wrote:takoma wrote:Anonymous wrote:You cannot be loyal to a country that you feel needs to be fundamentally changed. That means you don't respect the Constitution, the laws of the land.Anonymous wrote:Loyalties? Really? Who do you think he's loyal to, if not the US?Anonymous wrote:BINGO!Anonymous wrote:I was the poster who referred to the Hanoi Hilton. I am not, nor ever have been, a birther. I have never questioned O's citizenship-though I do question his policies and loyalties.
Carl Schurz, a naturalized American, who was a general and a Republican Senator, among other positions, is perjhaps best known for the quote "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." Loving your country should not blind you to her faults. Perhaps even fundamental faults. Unfortunately, Obama has done little to change some of the faults he himself campaigned against.
By circumventing the Constitution? I don't think so.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the poster who referred to the Hanoi Hilton. I am not, nor ever have been, a birther. I have never questioned O's citizenship-though I do question his policies and loyalties.
BINGO!
Loyalties? Really? Who do you think he's loyal to, if not the US?
You cannot be loyal to a country that you feel needs to be fundamentally changed. That means you don't respect the Constitution, the laws of the land.
Your position is that Obama is a traitor? Is that your final answer?
If that is how you personally define the word traitor, then yep.
How does the Govt legally define traitor, that's the real question. Obama has said himself he wants to fundamentally transform America: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrefKCaV8m4
Can't do that and be loyal at the same time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the poster who referred to the Hanoi Hilton. I am not, nor ever have been, a birther. I have never questioned O's citizenship-though I do question his policies and loyalties.
BINGO!
Loyalties? Really? Who do you think he's loyal to, if not the US?
You cannot be loyal to a country that you feel needs to be fundamentally changed. That means you don't respect the Constitution, the laws of the land.
You mean like Mark Levin?
Except Mr. Levin wants to legally amend the constitution, not dismantle it. He's trying to keep the Obamas of this world from destroying the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the poster who referred to the Hanoi Hilton. I am not, nor ever have been, a birther. I have never questioned O's citizenship-though I do question his policies and loyalties.
BINGO!
Loyalties? Really? Who do you think he's loyal to, if not the US?
You cannot be loyal to a country that you feel needs to be fundamentally changed. That means you don't respect the Constitution, the laws of the land.
You mean like Mark Levin?