Anonymous wrote:
Terrible, obnoxious advice. Imagine if DH had secret accounts somewhere and how you'd react.
Anonymous wrote:The above is true if it came to a divorce, yes. But what OP did, by putting that money away in an account only in her name, is protect herself from being destitute and unable to retain a good attorney in a divorce should her husband decide to leave her with nothing. She has an ATM she can hit. Because this was a joint mortgage, and her account was apparently at the same bank as the jointly held mortgage, her husband got away with this. I doubt it would have worked if her stash had been at another bank. And I doubt it would work with respect to anything other than the mortgage or, possibly, a jointly held credit card. It would not be legal for her husband, during the marriage, to just start writing checks from an account only in her name, and no utility company or other business would just access her funds on his say-so.
Personally, I don't have much problem with what OP did, and I am not a SAHM. The work she does at home is work which is worth money. It is not clear that her husband was allowing her access to marital funds, or to what extent. I didn't see any reference to their having a joint account. All of the money her husband brings in is marital. And so, over time, she skimmed bits of it from the budget, and put it away in her name -- just in case. Sure, it would be better if these two were more open and honest about their finances and had a joint account and everything was like a hallmark card. But it obviously isn't, so OP played the cards she had been dealt to the best of her ability. I don't share in everyone's condemnation of OP.
OP, my advice is to take your emergency account TO ANOTHER BANK. Do not tell him or anyone which one you choose. Or give it to a family member, a close friend -- anyone you absolutely trust. Or, buy a small, fire-proof safe deposit box, put the cash there, and hide it somewhere he would never look. No, it won't earn interest. But, using any of the above strategies, you won't be forced to make any more mortgage payments, either.
What is up with people on DCUM. Why isn't anyone asking why this GAINFULLY EMPLOYED MAN couldn't pay the mortgage? Isn't that part of the deal? She works at home, keeps it clean, takes care of the kids, puts dinner on the table. He pays the mortgage.
Stop dumping on OP.
Anonymous wrote:
OR, again, he MAN's up -- tells his wife that they cannot afford for her to stay at home.
Anonymous wrote:OP here, it is a true story. I opened my bank account statement and saw $2800 taken out to our mortgage company. He didn't even ask me. He just did it! I am so mad! He asked whether he would pay the mortgage late or pay for my car! It has always been like this, him making me choose between things - once it was a car vs. dental work. Why should I have to choose between things I need.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't sound like it. She said she skimmed over several years. He's been paying the mortgage fine. All of a sudden -- now -- he cannot afford the mortgage? Who, exactly, is the loser here?
And I agree with OP and a handful of others. There is no "my car" and "his car". There are two family cars. And, as the GAINFULLY EMPLOYED MAN of the house, he is responsible for repairing BOTH OF THEM. He should not be asking her to choose between a car repair and DENTAL WORK. It is his obligation to pay for BOTH. These are not luxuries -- these are necessities. If OP and her H were arguing as to how much money should be budgeted for clothes, shopping, and personal grooming, there would be some room for debate as to how much he should pay for (though he should also pay for some of that).
Again, I am not a SAHM. But this man agreed to his wife staying home. Until I hear otherwise, I am going to assume that she is doing the job of a SAHM: laundry, cleaning, kid stuff, grocery shopping, meals on the table. Basically, she takes care of the home and manages the household. This is work, for which she is entitled to compensation. Her husband is not giving her access to marital funds. Instead, he's giving her money from which to pay certain household expenses. That his number one "BAD". His second bad, is that, having the benefit of a wife who works in the home, he did not hold up his end of the deal -- which is to pay the household expenses. Most especially the mortgage. This is not a MAN.
A MAN either MANs up, and takes the responsibilities that come with the benefits of working outside the home (getting away from it all, getting to socialize, going out for lunches and happy hours, maintaining and expanding upon skills that continue to make him marketable) -- and this includes paying the mortgage -- OR, again, he MAN's up -- tells his wife that they cannot afford for her to stay at home. Gives her some time to transition to the job market, and then DOES HIS SHARE OF THE HOUSEWORK.
My analysis remains the same irrespective of which member of the family is working outside or within the home.
This man wants to have his cake and eat it. No, he's worse than that. He wants to pay for the cake via his wife's routing number behind her back and eat it.
Anonymous wrote:The above is true if it came to a divorce, yes. But what OP did, by putting that money away in an account only in her name, is protect herself from being destitute and unable to retain a good attorney in a divorce should her husband decide to leave her with nothing. She has an ATM she can hit. Because this was a joint mortgage, and her account was apparently at the same bank as the jointly held mortgage, her husband got away with this. I doubt it would have worked if her stash had been at another bank. And I doubt it would work with respect to anything other than the mortgage or, possibly, a jointly held credit card. It would not be legal for her husband, during the marriage, to just start writing checks from an account only in her name, and no utility company or other business would just access her funds on his say-so.
Personally, I don't have much problem with what OP did, and I am not a SAHM. The work she does at home is work which is worth money. It is not clear that her husband was allowing her access to marital funds, or to what extent. I didn't see any reference to their having a joint account. All of the money her husband brings in is marital. And so, over time, she skimmed bits of it from the budget, and put it away in her name -- just in case. Sure, it would be better if these two were more open and honest about their finances and had a joint account and everything was like a hallmark card. But it obviously isn't, so OP played the cards she had been dealt to the best of her ability. I don't share in everyone's condemnation of OP.
OP, my advice is to take your emergency account TO ANOTHER BANK. Do not tell him or anyone which one you choose. Or give it to a family member, a close friend -- anyone you absolutely trust. Or, buy a small, fire-proof safe deposit box, put the cash there, and hide it somewhere he would never look. No, it won't earn interest. But, using any of the above strategies, you won't be forced to make any more mortgage payments, either.
What is up with people on DCUM. Why isn't anyone asking why this GAINFULLY EMPLOYED MAN couldn't pay the mortgage? Isn't that part of the deal? She works at home, keeps it clean, takes care of the kids, puts dinner on the table. He pays the mortgage.
Stop dumping on OP.
Anonymous wrote:If this is his household money you've been putting in an account, then it's a joint savings account. Sorry, honey.