Anonymous wrote:This year, DCPS mandated that all elementary teachers implement Reading Workshop. We use reading comprehension levels to divide our classes into Guided Reading groups. We read and discuss texts according to the Fountas and Pinnell level (from A-Z). This is a form of tracking. It's not a "G/T program" but it does group students by ability.
Anonymous wrote:11:12, at Brent it doesn't work all that well. The kids that are waaaay ahead get dumbed down. They are trying at Brent, but the range of ability is too wide.
Anonymous wrote:11:12, at Brent it doesn't work all that well. The kids that are waaaay ahead get dumbed down. They are trying at Brent, but the range of ability is too wide.
Anonymous wrote:How does that work when there is so much disparity in some classrooms, where for example you might have a middle school classroom where some kids can read at a college level, and other kids can't even read? I know for a fact that situation actually exists in some DC middle school classrooms right now, and the teachers cannot adequately meet the needs of every one of those kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ideological reasons are well intentioned but an utter disaster in practice. When for example you have a middle school classroom where some of the kids are already capable of reading at a college level, and others can't read at all, there's so much disparity that no teacher can meet any of their needs effectively. Even with superstar teachers, there will always be students missing out, the classroom will be always dysfunctional and uncohesive as a whole.
This is really getting to the issue, differentiation works well within a certain spectrum; however, when you have children that cannot read (for whatever reason) then it clearly will not work because those children cannot access the materials. The problem is DCPS does not admit that students currently in high and middle school do not have these basic skills, these children need targeted intervention and by that I do not mean try a new thing every week with unqualified (literacy) teachers doing pull-out. DCPS should be able to point to a plan that they have across the school district for students that read/or are not able to read at specific lexile levels. Differentiation is a fantastic tool but you can't teach phonics and decoding at the same time as doing a differentiated close reading activity with a classroom of students from non to on grade level students, while simultaneously creating your own curriculum. That's a whole other problem, lack of curricula at DCPS!!!! Get busy DCPS you have enough people at central office to have created more than your current scope/sequence.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find it hard to believe that any G&T program would turn away kids testing at the upper end of the IQ scale who've recently moved to the area.
Really? I don't know about MD and VA, but NYC does this all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Students don't need to test "gifted" to take honors classes in most Metro area middle schools. I know this because my siblings have children in ordinary suburban middle schools, in McClean and Takoma Park MD (not in the test-in math/science magnet).
Suburban kids can normally take honors English, science, foreign language, social studies and advanced math without having tested in. They are allowed to sign up for upper level courses based on county standardized test results and/or teacher recommendations. I'm told that a good quarter of the kids who start any particular honors class elect to drop down to a "regular" class because they can't or won't do the tougher work. There is some movement the other way as well, with teachers recommending that particularly able and motivated kids in regular courses move up.
What is so horrible about this type of tracking? One of my nieces is in honors classes for math and science but not English, the other in honors English,Spanish and social studies but not advanced math. They both seem happy, challenged and OK with the concept of not being high fliers in every subject. My siblings say that the kids are on track to pursue the full International Baccalaureate diploma in HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students don't need to test "gifted" to take honors classes in most Metro area middle schools. I know this because my siblings have children in ordinary suburban middle schools, in McClean and Takoma Park MD (not in the test-in math/science magnet).
Suburban kids can normally take honors English, science, foreign language, social studies and advanced math without having tested in. They are allowed to sign up for upper level courses based on county standardized test results and/or teacher recommendations. I'm told that a good quarter of the kids who start any particular honors class elect to drop down to a "regular" class because they can't or won't do the tougher work. There is some movement the other way as well, with teachers recommending that particularly able and motivated kids in regular courses move up.
What is so horrible about this type of tracking? One of my nieces is in honors classes for math and science but not English, the other in honors English,Spanish and social studies but not advanced math. They both seem happy, challenged and OK with the concept of not being high fliers in every subject. My siblings say that the kids are on track to pursue the full International Baccalaureate diploma in HS.
Well now you are changing the topic. There is a difference between AP honor classes and a G&T school. To my knowledge, DC high schools offer AP classes at Wilson, McKinley, Banneker, SWW, Chavez, and Coolidge. Honor classes might be offers at some of the other schools, but I am unaware of them.
Anonymous wrote:Students don't need to test "gifted" to take honors classes in most Metro area middle schools. I know this because my siblings have children in ordinary suburban middle schools, in McClean and Takoma Park MD (not in the test-in math/science magnet).
Suburban kids can normally take honors English, science, foreign language, social studies and advanced math without having tested in. They are allowed to sign up for upper level courses based on county standardized test results and/or teacher recommendations. I'm told that a good quarter of the kids who start any particular honors class elect to drop down to a "regular" class because they can't or won't do the tougher work. There is some movement the other way as well, with teachers recommending that particularly able and motivated kids in regular courses move up.
What is so horrible about this type of tracking? One of my nieces is in honors classes for math and science but not English, the other in honors English,Spanish and social studies but not advanced math. They both seem happy, challenged and OK with the concept of not being high fliers in every subject. My siblings say that the kids are on track to pursue the full International Baccalaureate diploma in HS.
Anonymous wrote:I find it hard to believe that any G&T program would turn away kids testing at the upper end of the IQ scale who've recently moved to the area.