Anonymous wrote:Top LACs are slowly dying. They are finding it very hard to compete with ivies as shown by their very low yields and every year there are tens and tens of top LAC students transferring into the ivies.
Anonymous wrote:Top LACs are slowly dying. They are finding it very hard to compete with ivies as shown by their very low yields and every year there are tens and tens of top LAC students transferring into the ivies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Seems like the school has morfed from what was a very respective SLACs to more a liberal bastion for the far left.
That's "ok" if that's what you are looking for.
Many people who post here are simply looking for direction/feedback on schools etc. Apparently the information circulating about Swat (of which, it is all 100% true) along with resulting views of parents has touched the nerves of a few die hard lefties......
How does it compare to Oberlin?
Anonymous wrote:Seems like the school has morfed from what was a very respective SLACs to more a liberal bastion for the far left.
That's "ok" if that's what you are looking for.
Many people who post here are simply looking for direction/feedback on schools etc. Apparently the information circulating about Swat (of which, it is all 100% true) along with resulting views of parents has touched the nerves of a few die hard lefties......
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP makes a point about "inclusion". Hard to disagree with that. But, it does seem as if the group boycotting Israel...hard to see what good that accomplishes?
Well, actually the boycotting and divestiture campaign against South Africa helped end apartheid.
On please! Only Jimmy Carter compares Israel to apartheid South Africa.
Anonymous wrote:DH and I went to top Ivies. Honestly, we always thought of Swarthmore as a junior women's college -- like a Pine Manor for Quakers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP makes a point about "inclusion". Hard to disagree with that. But, it does seem as if the group boycotting Israel...hard to see what good that accomplishes?
Well, actually the boycotting and divestiture campaign against South Africa helped end apartheid.
On please! Only Jimmy Carter compares Israel to apartheid South Africa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP makes a point about "inclusion". Hard to disagree with that. But, it does seem as if the group boycotting Israel...hard to see what good that accomplishes?
Well, actually the boycotting and divestiture campaign against South Africa helped end apartheid.
Anonymous wrote:At my DD"s private school -- a girl went to Swarthmore even though she was accepted at Yale. We couldn't figure that one out because generally folks at Swarthmore were just below being "Ivy material". I have a bunch of neighbor girls from Swarthmore. They all seem like nice, normal, kind of nerdy/bookish girls to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I graduated from Swarthmore quite a while ago, but I have to say these news items don't surprise me. I thought I was liberal as a teenager, and in fact have been a lifelong Democrat, but I was considered right of center at Swarthmore. For instance, in the '90s there was an angry debate on campus about whether or not there should be an American flag on top of the main campus building. A number of students felt that they could not support what an American flag represented.
It was not a good fit for me in the end, because of its *truly* excessive academic intensity and its failure to direct students to anything other than academia/med school after graduation. It had small classes and I made some good friends, but I can't say I would recommend it for my kids.
AFter one gets through all of the prior "useless" posts (several of which were mean spirited) this post has the informtion that the original post had intended to solicit.....thanks for this constructive information
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Apparently this school now wides with the anit-Jewish group the American Studies Association and its boycott of Israel.
What/who is the American Studies Assocition anyway and what is it with this school?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/us/members-of-jewish-student-group-test-permissible-discussion-on-israel.html?ref=education&_r=0
First, this article doesn't report on any actions or positions taken by Swarthmore, rather it reports on the Hillel group at Swarthmore, which has challenged Hillel's policy of prohibiting its campus groups from participating in or offering any programs that Hillel deems to be "unsupportive" of Israel. The Swarthmore Hillel is not boycotting Israel; it simply wants to be inclusive of broader viewpoints than those santionced by Hillel.
Second, as the article states, the American Studies Association is a group of 5,000 professors at American colleges and universities. It is not boycotting Israel, but boycotting academic institutions in Israel over their treatment of Palestinians.
For the record, I have no personal connection with Swarthmore, but I do know several current students and alumni. I don't know what their views are on this issue, but I will say that they have excellent reading comprehension. Perhaps you could find a Swarthnmore student or alum willing to tutor you in this area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Apparently this school now wides with the anit-Jewish group the American Studies Association and its boycott of Israel.
What/who is the American Studies Assocition anyway and what is it with this school?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/us/members-of-jewish-student-group-test-permissible-discussion-on-israel.html?ref=education&_r=0
As a proud Jew with deep religious faith, I resent your lies about this article. There is nothing anti-Jewish about what was done here. The Swarthmore Hillel (Jews, by the way. Students who actively seek to identify as Jewish) has chosen to respect the diversity of opinion within the Jewish community -- a Jewish value, by the way. I don't agree with the boycott but I do have a problem with this idea that the American Jewish community has to be monolithic in its beliefs.