Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If admission were based only on test scores, this argument would have validity.
Chill out and wait for the admission decisions before you freak out. There is an appeal process for a reason.
My child was born in July (young) and scored 93%. He was sick during the NNAT test and scored 130. Did not make the cut off. He has good grades.
We cannot afford the WISC, I cannot appeal with any new test scores. Doesn't look good for us.
Didn't I see something that says kids can test one additional time during their ES career?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If admission were based only on test scores, this argument would have validity.
Chill out and wait for the admission decisions before you freak out. There is an appeal process for a reason.
My child was born in July (young) and scored 93%. He was sick during the NNAT test and scored 130. Did not make the cut off. He has good grades.
We cannot afford the WISC, I cannot appeal with any new test scores. Doesn't look good for us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If admission were based only on test scores, this argument would have validity.
Chill out and wait for the admission decisions before you freak out. There is an appeal process for a reason.
My child was born in July (young) and scored 93%. He was sick during the NNAT test and scored 130. Did not make the cut off. He has good grades.
We cannot afford the WISC, I cannot appeal with any new test scores. Doesn't look good for us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry, hit send too soon.
...If you are an underrepresented, non native speaker, that is the demographic that fcps said they are trying to bring into the fold, at the meetings last fall. The fact that your child is coming from a school with many esl students, and also many free/reduced lunch students might also help your child's case. I would also look into the data of how many kids at your school traditionally qualify for AAP, and include that in your packet. If your child scored so close to the cut off, but is from a demographic where few kids actually make it into AAP, then perhaps that shows that your child is at the top for children with similar language and socioeconomic issues, and will also demonstrate the challenges your child is facing, and the potential your child shows in spite of those challenges.
Good luck!
I read recently that FCPS has "promised" the state that they will increase ESOL & other minority students in AAP by 10%. Not quite sure how they can promise something that should be not in their control but there it is.
Anonymous wrote:Grade norm should suffice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember though that Fcps can do exActly what they want . Gifted services are not mandated-- only a local plan is. If you look at the neighboring school districts, you'll see that Fcps can construct these services however they choose to and if that is changing the screening method, so be it.
bingo. No one has a property right to AAP admission. They used the same method for all the test takers. perfectly legal.
No, they didn't , if the questions are not standardized for age. That's what we've been saying all along.
Yes, they did. The same questions were given to all the children in the grade. They were all scored using the same answer key.
Now I'm waiting for the post where parents of summer birthday kids are going to complain that their GBRS scores should be weighted because redshirted kids in the class had an extra year to develop their gifted behaviors.
Simple questions: Why are WISC IQ tests and national CogAT scores and the NNAT age normalized by month?
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, hit send too soon.
...If you are an underrepresented, non native speaker, that is the demographic that fcps said they are trying to bring into the fold, at the meetings last fall. The fact that your child is coming from a school with many esl students, and also many free/reduced lunch students might also help your child's case. I would also look into the data of how many kids at your school traditionally qualify for AAP, and include that in your packet. If your child scored so close to the cut off, but is from a demographic where few kids actually make it into AAP, then perhaps that shows that your child is at the top for children with similar language and socioeconomic issues, and will also demonstrate the challenges your child is facing, and the potential your child shows in spite of those challenges.
Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:Grade norm should suffice.