Anonymous wrote:The best way to find out is to test. See if he (Or anyone else for that matter.) can go to having drinks every other night or every third night. If not, then yes he's an alcoholic because there is a dependency on those drinks. You don't need to be , or even appear tipsy, to be an alcoholic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:functioning alcoholics have 2-3 drinks a night.
you can have functioning crack heads too
Please show me a functioning crack head.
Anonymous wrote:Ditto all those who are saying that it's not about the number of drinks but the reason behind them. I used to have 1-2 glasses of wine a night. I loved those glasses of wine and looked forward to them. I did become concerned that I was a bit too dependent on alcohol. So I cut way back and learned that I wasn't dependent on the alcohol - I just enjoyed wine and got in the HABIT of having that glass or two of wine every night. That is not alcoholism. That is enjoying a bit of alcohol mixed with habit. A habit that was easy to break once I decided to, even though it was an enjoyable habit. An alcoholic can't break the habit that easily.
Anonymous wrote:Pp, I don't think you're reading carefully what I and at least one other pp are saying. We're talking about whether someone who has two to three drinks a day has to have it. People who can take it or leave it don't have a problem. But if you can't function without it, you have a problem. And I have actual loved ones who were and are alcoholics so I know what I'm talking about. You're not the only one who has been through this.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17:37 you seem really defensive and hung up on the label. This is the deal: whether one glass or fifty, what defines an alcoholic is the need - or perceived need - to drink alcohol and the inability to control that urge. Sorry if this hits a nerve for you, but that's the reality.
I'm not defensive. I just think it is kind of clueless and offensive to people who have had loved ones who are actual alcoholics to pretend that having 2 drinks/night is alcoholism. Alcoholism has a clinical definition -- no matter how much you like those two drinks, it does not make you an alcoholic. Get back to me when your loved one is literally falling over drunk in their puke; still drunk the next morning; and you literally fear for their lives. Not all alcoholism is this severe all the time, but it is just stupid to act like two drinks is a "problem" any where close to the equivalent of true alcoholism, the kind that obviously threatens your health, job, and relationships.
If you want to argue that you have suffered more than I because your alcoholic was falling over drunk in their own puke, that's fine with me. I'm guessing that you had it worse just based on this statement. But I watched my mom go off into her old age fuzzy-headed and self-medicating her anxiety and obsessing about her drink quotient when she could have been clear-minded and living a much fuller and rich life. You want to say she wasn't a real alcoholic - fine. But she had a problem that made her old age much worse than it should have been and she would have been a lot better off if she had quit drinking.
Pp, I don't think you're reading carefully what I and at least one other pp are saying. We're talking about whether someone who has two to three drinks a day has to have it. People who can take it or leave it don't have a problem. But if you can't function without it, you have a problem. And I have actual loved ones who were and are alcoholics so I know what I'm talking about. You're not the only one who has been through this.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:17:37 you seem really defensive and hung up on the label. This is the deal: whether one glass or fifty, what defines an alcoholic is the need - or perceived need - to drink alcohol and the inability to control that urge. Sorry if this hits a nerve for you, but that's the reality.
I'm not defensive. I just think it is kind of clueless and offensive to people who have had loved ones who are actual alcoholics to pretend that having 2 drinks/night is alcoholism. Alcoholism has a clinical definition -- no matter how much you like those two drinks, it does not make you an alcoholic. Get back to me when your loved one is literally falling over drunk in their puke; still drunk the next morning; and you literally fear for their lives. Not all alcoholism is this severe all the time, but it is just stupid to act like two drinks is a "problem" any where close to the equivalent of true alcoholism, the kind that obviously threatens your health, job, and relationships.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'm starting to think that other people's definitions of "2-3 drinks" must be very different from mine. In my world, one can have 2 - 3 drinks over the course of the night and never have your BAC rise significantly. I think the people here claiming 2 drinks = alcoholic must be talking about something very different, otherwise entire nations would be alcoholics. But if one drink = an entire wineglass full to the brim, then yes, having 2-3 of those could be problematic.
You would probably be surprised if you tested your BAC after 2-3 drinks - likely much higher than you think even if you aren't feeling any effects of the alcohol. Hence why one should never drink and drive, even if feeling sober.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'm starting to think that other people's definitions of "2-3 drinks" must be very different from mine. In my world, one can have 2 - 3 drinks over the course of the night and never have your BAC rise significantly. I think the people here claiming 2 drinks = alcoholic must be talking about something very different, otherwise entire nations would be alcoholics. But if one drink = an entire wineglass full to the brim, then yes, having 2-3 of those could be problematic.
You would probably be surprised if you tested your BAC after 2-3 drinks - likely much higher than you think even if you aren't feeling any effects of the alcohol. Hence why one should never drink and drive, even if feeling sober.
Anonymous wrote:functioning alcoholics have 2-3 drinks a night.
you can have functioning crack heads too
Anonymous wrote:Ok, I'm starting to think that other people's definitions of "2-3 drinks" must be very different from mine. In my world, one can have 2 - 3 drinks over the course of the night and never have your BAC rise significantly. I think the people here claiming 2 drinks = alcoholic must be talking about something very different, otherwise entire nations would be alcoholics. But if one drink = an entire wineglass full to the brim, then yes, having 2-3 of those could be problematic.