Anonymous wrote:PP, It's about not even getting the basics right at dcps - poor choices of curriculum and textbooks, lack of emphasis on the right things (like phonics), and misguided approaches like differentiation which do not work and only drag everyone down to the level of the weakest link in the classroom. There are many lessons to be learned from the past and from other schools, as to which things work and which things do not work, but instead everyone in the public school system seems to want to rely on the latest vogue educational fads and fluffy feel-good studies by academics. But, the reality is that what's "new" isn't necessarily what's better, and regional and longterm performance and results demonstrate that quite clearly.
NP here.
PP, you have a lot of opinions, but it's important to note that they are just that, personal opinions. You can't back up claims about phonics or differentiation and you're not qualified to judge what works and what doesn't. How do I know this? Because anyone who actually works in education knows that there are no simple answers and people like you, who think you know it all, make it harder for the serious people to create and implement the kind of innovative solutions that are needed if we are really to make a difference in schools.
Yes, you're entitled to your overly simplistic opinions, but please stop trying to sound like a professional, because it is quite clear that you are not.
PP, It's about not even getting the basics right at dcps - poor choices of curriculum and textbooks, lack of emphasis on the right things (like phonics), and misguided approaches like differentiation which do not work and only drag everyone down to the level of the weakest link in the classroom. There are many lessons to be learned from the past and from other schools, as to which things work and which things do not work, but instead everyone in the public school system seems to want to rely on the latest vogue educational fads and fluffy feel-good studies by academics. But, the reality is that what's "new" isn't necessarily what's better, and regional and longterm performance and results demonstrate that quite clearly.
Anonymous wrote:I have a 5th grader, that school uses Common Core. I don't know if it is the teachers/ admin or the curriculum but he is so unenthused about going to school. They get reading comprehension hand outs that puts me to sleep .The passion is gone from this school. Teachers are worried about being fired or quit because they know this is not going to work. He has been there since Pre-K and I am worried that middle school is going to eat him alive. As soon as the the teacher tells him to read Ch. 1 thru Ch.6 and be ready for a test the next day, he is going to wonder, where are the Common Core "hand-outs". It is all about conforming to Common Core and DC CAS at this school. No history, the science is a joke and art is very basic. [/quote
Everyone is supposed to be using the Common Core, that is just an infrastructure for sequencing and structuring concepts. The use of hand outs such as you describe just sound like poor implementation. Frankly the school you are describing sounds like DCPS when it is failing.
Anonymous wrote:Ha! Funny to hear some mediocre teacher from a crappy DCPS school with lousy DC-CAS results trying to tell the rest of the world how it's done.
This has been truly entertaining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha! Funny to hear some mediocre teacher from a crappy DCPS school with lousy DC-CAS results trying to tell the rest of the world how it's done.
This has been truly entertaining.
Ms. Potty Mouth! Actually, we had double digit gains last year.
Well, congratulations to you. But that's still just a very short list of 10 DCPS schools (all elementary schools, except for Burroughs) out of 122 total DCPS schools that had "double digit gains" - and just barely, as they are in the teens. And among those "big gainers", even the best of them had over half of the school not even minimally proficient enough to pass the watered-down DC-CAS test. Suffice it to say I am underwhelmed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ha! Funny to hear some mediocre teacher from a crappy DCPS school with lousy DC-CAS results trying to tell the rest of the world how it's done.
This has been truly entertaining.
Ms. Potty Mouth! Actually, we had double digit gains last year.
Anonymous wrote:Ha! Funny to hear some mediocre teacher from a crappy DCPS school with lousy DC-CAS results trying to tell the rest of the world how it's done.
This has been truly entertaining.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:but probably not public school, tested grade.
LOL! Yeah, all bets on common sense and fundamentals are off when you get to public school.
So you've never taught in a public school, and probably never had to use standards, and you've never taught in a tested grade, so you don't know what you're talking about. Glad we got that settled.
You are responding to someone else - I never taught at DCPS, I'm not originally from DC - but where I taught there were indeed standards and a far higher level of achievement and expectations and far better results from the students than anything DCPS is getting in most of its schools. I do indeed know what I'm talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:but probably not public school, tested grade.
LOL! Yeah, all bets on common sense and fundamentals are off when you get to public school.
So you've never taught in a public school, and probably never had to use standards, and you've never taught in a tested grade, so you don't know what you're talking about. Glad we got that settled.
You are responding to someone else - I never taught at DCPS, I'm not originally from DC - but where I taught there were indeed standards and a far higher level of achievement and expectations and far better results from the students than anything DCPS is getting in most of its schools. I do indeed know what I'm talking about.