its going to be a warm and cozy winter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I wouldn't, but we have not finished saving for our kids' college educations.
Wow...so, you'll look like a hag until your kids' college funds are fully funded?
Um, the opposite of not buying a $400 sweater isn't looking like a hag. Get a grip, PP. Plenty of people look fantastic in clothes that cost less than three digits.
Not in this area. Sacrificial lambs rarely look good.
WTF are you talking about?
I rarely spend more than $50 on one clothing item and I'm pretty sure I look like neither a hag nor a "sacrificial lamb." When I go to the store I see no discernible difference between Levi's jeans and $200 ones. We do not live in an age where luxury items reflect quality or sophistication (see gaudy Coach bags etc.), although this "yak" sweater appears to be the exception (?!). Almost everything is made in the same few factories in China. People compliment a blouse I bought for $6 at Macy's every time I wear it. I would rather make my own clothes if I had to than buy this over-priced status item crap.
Agree with PP here. Would also add that people with truely great taste and fashion sense can make something that they got for $5 at a thrift store look like a $500 purchase. With the exception of haute couture, it's rare that price equals really unique style, cut, or quality.
Moreover, I was a designer for a high-end, off-the-rack, brand for several years and the manufacturers we used also produced lower-end brands. In the same factories often using the exact techniques and processes. It's very rare that price equates to quality in the fashion world, especially off the rack (though there are certainly exceptions). Honestly, most of the people who pay big bucks for clothes are suckers.
A thrift store find is not the same as buying a shirt with a retail value of $5. In fact, many thrift stores have name brand items for less. Your comparison fails.
Anonymous wrote:If I made about three times as much as I do now, sure. But as it stands currently, of course not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know how to knit and would make it myself, if I really wanted it. But by my guess the op needs it to win friends and influence people and that can have some value. Though the quality of friends that you get like that can be disappointing
Trust me, that is not the reason why I want this sweater. I just really like it and it would be very warm and I personally would rather buy something that I really loved and was more expensive rather many cheaply made products that would fall apart and last one season. I bought a sweater from Kohls last year that was really nice, but after a season of wearing it, it looks really worn out. So, I am hedging on this splurge. Our finances are fine btw and I do not consider myself always shopping for clothes. I am also looking at this huge and warm sweater to save on heating bills. My DH always jokes to me to "put on a jacket" in our house because I am always freezing. This would be a good sweater for that, but I have never spent that much on a sweater. And therefore am hesitant to do so.
Anonymous wrote:That's half my weekly income. I would not spend that much on a sweater or any other article of clothing.
Anonymous wrote:I know how to knit and would make it myself, if I really wanted it. But by my guess the op needs it to win friends and influence people and that can have some value. Though the quality of friends that you get like that can be disappointing
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, I wouldn't, but we have not finished saving for our kids' college educations.
Wow...so, you'll look like a hag until your kids' college funds are fully funded?
Um, the opposite of not buying a $400 sweater isn't looking like a hag. Get a grip, PP. Plenty of people look fantastic in clothes that cost less than three digits.
Not in this area. Sacrificial lambs rarely look good.
Meaning your kids are on their own for college but you have fabulous clothing?
Nah. More like I'll expect them to pitch in for their *own* education and Mom still has money to splurge on herself when she wants to.
Selfish.