Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You could have chosen charity, the greater good, and you chose self over selflessness.
Next time you are faced with such a situation, try to push yourself to greater charity.
Next time you order the T-bone steak and glance over to the next table where the guy ordered the mini burger, make damm sure you give him your steak!!
Your comparison is foolish, and fails to make the point you were trying to make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I disagree with this, and especially the last snarky comment. Why didn't the woman offer to move back to sit with her husband? Answer - she was sitting in a row with more leg room, and didn't want to give it up - I'm sure whomever was in the middle seat next to her husband would have gladly taken a seat with extra room. If she really wanted to sit next to her husband, she could have moved, but thought the extra room was more important. Why doesn't the same apply to the OP (whether s/he paid extra for the seat or not)?
Note - my answer woudl have been different if is was a parent asking to sit next to a child. But these are two adults - I view that as totally different.
Have you not read the thread, PP? OP has said a couple of times that her DH was in a row with two family members traveling together, and so she didn't want to move back to split them up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You could have chosen charity, the greater good, and you chose self over selflessness.
Next time you are faced with such a situation, try to push yourself to greater charity.
Next time you order the T-bone steak and glance over to the next table where the guy ordered the mini burger, make damm sure you give him your steak!!
So... I am assuming all these non-entitled people on this thread had absolutely no issue with men not getting up for them when they were on the metro pregnant? It's "just" a pregnancy, right?
Anonymous wrote:You could have chosen charity, the greater good, and you chose self over selflessness.
Next time you are faced with such a situation, try to push yourself to greater charity.

Anonymous wrote:
I disagree with this, and especially the last snarky comment. Why didn't the woman offer to move back to sit with her husband? Answer - she was sitting in a row with more leg room, and didn't want to give it up - I'm sure whomever was in the middle seat next to her husband would have gladly taken a seat with extra room. If she really wanted to sit next to her husband, she could have moved, but thought the extra room was more important. Why doesn't the same apply to the OP (whether s/he paid extra for the seat or not)?
Note - my answer woudl have been different if is was a parent asking to sit next to a child. But these are two adults - I view that as totally different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was on a flight recently. I was sitting in coach, in an aisle seat, in one of the rows with seats that have just a tad more leg room (they're called 'premium' or economy plus or something like that). A pregnant woman was sitting next to me. Turns out that her husband was a few rows back; for some reason they didn't have seats together. The husband, who was also in an aisle seat, said to me something like, 'excuse me, would you mind switching seats with me so that i can sit with my wife? this is her first flight pregnant.' I pointed to my legs and said apologetically, "this seat has extra leg room...." The husband said, 'oh okay' and went back to his seat. What do you think? Was it kind of jerky to me not to move? The flight was about 2 hours.
I think so, yes. It was two hours out of your life and I'm sure that woman would have appreciated sitting next to her husband. Think twice next time and try to be more considerate.
Anonymous wrote:Awww...remember everyone, OP was once somebody's very special snowflake!
Anonymous wrote:So... I am assuming all these non-entitled people on this thread had absolutely no issue with men not getting up for them when they were on the metro pregnant? It's "just" a pregnancy, right? Oh yea, you'll say it's different since you couldn't possibly be asked to stand.
This thread sure brought out the worst in some people. I have seen much more unreasonable fears on DCUM from women TTcing (e.g. "my BP was slightly higher, I am not pregnant, now I worry I might get preeclampsia and die"... uhm... what??) and pregnant, this one is certainly not as unusual as you try to make it sound.
Anonymous wrote:So... I am assuming all these non-entitled people on this thread had absolutely no issue with men not getting up for them when they were on the metro pregnant? It's "just" a pregnancy, right? Oh yea, you'll say it's different since you couldn't possibly be asked to stand.
This thread sure brought out the worst in some people. I have seen much more unreasonable fears on DCUM from women TTcing (e.g. "my BP was slightly higher, I am not pregnant, now I worry I might get preeclampsia and die"... uhm... what??) and pregnant, this one is certainly not as unusual as you try to make it sound.