Anonymous wrote:
We are a happy Mundo Verde family, and right now Basis looks a lot more attractive than DCI only because I am not sure that I want my children exposed to the negativity that YY seems to bring on itself. We avoided applying for YY because of the negativity online.
Although it seems ridiculous to judge based on anonymous comments, there are so many overly defensive comments that it seems likely that this is a top-down issue, and I don't want to be involved with a school that spews that much negativity and resentment. I understand that they have taken a lot of risks and done a remarkable thing by creating this program from scratch, and they are to be lauded for that, but that doesn't cancel out the tone that they bring to each conversation. It is my responsibilty as a parent (even more than providing a good academic education, and certainly more providing than a good immersion education even though that is a high priority for us) to see that my children become good, happy people who can communicate rationally and calmly help to resolve differences. This is something that I am afraid they will not get at YY, given the way all criticism is received.
I sincerely hope that Mundo Verde, which has the exact opposite feeling, can help to even out the tone of DCI, as it seems like it could be an absolutely wonderful program.
Anonymous wrote:
I just don't understand all the negative attacks when any one of you can create your own YY or DCI if you have the stomach for the growing pains. I write this as someone who has issues with aspects of YY, but recognize it is a work in process from dedicated parents who sought something different and better for their children. Many of the parents who founded the school could have home schooled or had the financial means to go private. Instead, they offered an alternative of DCPS to many students who did not have options.
Anonymous wrote:
Agreed. No interest in Basis at all.
All grind, no idea what they're doing in DC, and students won't be well-rounded. No thank you.
I'd like to see how DCI plays out. If it succeeds in what it's supposed to do? That will work well for us: differentiation, high-expectations, well-rounded students (languages, sports, travel, community service). Of course, it helps to not be on the bleeding edges (but it's always best not to be on the bleeding edge). 8)
Perhaps public school isn't for you. If you'd like the benefits of public education (read: no private school tuition), you're just going to have to accept some of those "weak" students.
Perhaps public school isn't for you. If you'd like the benefits of public education (read: no private school tuition), you're just going to have to accept some of those "weak" students.There are far more students without language immersion in need of a good MS option than there are these allegedly better prepared immersion students (I say this because there is no real long term data to support that they are or are not better prepared since this assertion doesn't specify what exactly they are better prepared for...), and DCI needs to stop focusing on a "safe" option for their feeder school kids, and instead focus on creating a strong MS option that can accommodate all students. This will keep the seats full and the doors open, which is the one of the great challenges ahead for DCI.
But why can't DCI simply serve kids coming in with two languages? Most of the students at the private international schools are that category, and a lot more of their parents would surely be attracted to a school like DCI without the open lottery component. Maybe "safe" option should be termed "appropriate" option. Speaking a language is not like a race or class, you aren't born into it, you can learn. A lot of charter parents are sick of the "accomodate all students" mantra, since that's not what happens anyway. If DCI would be allowed to set this basic admissions critera--two languages per kid coming in--by partnering with DCPS, go for it. That would work well. Great challenges sounds like code for most upper-middle-class families avoiding, or dropping out, as per usual. Keeping seats full of lots of weak students takes us nowhere. Same old same old. DCI could be truly new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There are far more students without language immersion in need of a good MS option than there are these allegedly better prepared immersion students (I say this because there is no real long term data to support that they are or are not better prepared since this assertion doesn't specify what exactly they are better prepared for...), and DCI needs to stop focusing on a "safe" option for their feeder school kids, and instead focus on creating a strong MS option that can accommodate all students. This will keep the seats full and the doors open, which is the one of the great challenges ahead for DCI.
Anonymous wrote:
What I'd like to see, although nobody's talking about it, is for all the immersion elementary schools to have a direct feed into DCI, whether charter or DCPS. Is there no scope for a charter-DCPS hybrid school? Kaya Henderson has been talking about the concept of late. Seems artificial to exclude, for example, Oyster. That way, you would have more strong students than not. I worry that too much in the way of open lottery admissions could hurt the school in a city with such dramatic disparities between the prep most upper-middle-class kids come in with and others. The language immersion school kids, regardless of class, tend to be much better prepped than others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sure, my kid can decide they want to go to China. They are welcome to decide.
However, I'm the one stuck trying to come up with a huge amount of cash.
If I don't I'm the bad parent who didn't let my kid go to China.
So thanks! This will undoubtedly end up making several children and families feel very, very left out. But that sums up the whole Yu Ying experience--mean and exclusionary.
Why not join the fundraising committee? Instead of complaining, do something to ensure that your child has this amazing opportunity to solidify his/her Chinese skills.
Anonymous wrote:Sure, my kid can decide they want to go to China. They are welcome to decide.
However, I'm the one stuck trying to come up with a huge amount of cash.
If I don't I'm the bad parent who didn't let my kid go to China.
So thanks! This will undoubtedly end up making several children and families feel very, very left out. But that sums up the whole Yu Ying experience--mean and exclusionary.
Anonymous wrote:Posters may not be aware of just how tough it's becoming to get into Latin. They had around 300 applications for 30 non-sibling spots for 5th this spring when, just three years ago, they were taking close to 100% of the names going in the hat. Basis is likely to see a similar surge in applications, even if it is a grind. There just aren't enough decent MS options in the offing, particularly for Wards 5 and 6, leading me to suspect that DCI will be popular even if it starts at 6th. Alll those families striking out at Latin and Basis have to go somewhere.
What I'd like to see, although nobody's talking about it, is for all the immersion elementary schools to have a direct feed into DCI, whether charter or DCPS. Is there no scope for a charter-DCPS hybrid school? Kaya Henderson has been talking about the concept of late. Seems artificial to exclude, for example, Oyster. That way, you would have more strong students than not. I worry that too much in the way of open lottery admissions could hurt the school in a city with such dramatic disparities between the prep most upper-middle-class kids come in with and others. The language immersion school kids, regardless of class, tend to be much better prepped than others.
why on earth would the DCI founders want to partner with DCPS? talk about getting in bed with the devil.....