Anonymous wrote:good for you if you have a car. some people don't, you know?
btw to those asking me to take the toddler outside, if you were one of the patrons enjoying your meal in the outdoor area would you be annoyed at my screaming child? note that it's a busy street with lots of such restaurants all with outdoor areas where people can eat and smoke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Next time, remove your kid, take her outside, to the car and you will avoid the stinky eye. Simple.
and you'll hold my infant for me?
note that DH tries to help but infant and toddler are going through a phase that both will only be content on mom's lap. we're still adjusting. we can try to reason with the toddler but as some of you know it doesn't help. and unless DH is wearing a shirt bathed in breastmilk and my swat the infant won't stop screaming on his lap.
Take loud, obnoxious toddler out in the car (also infant if DH is incapable), let DH eat then come relieve you in the car so you can come back in and eat. Take some food in the car and let loud, obnoxious toddler eat in the car. Quite simple, really.
This is, of course, because "eating and leaving were NOT options".
Oh, and get over yourself.
Anonymous wrote:oh so now, all at once I'm supposed to discipline my child, make sure my infant doesn't join the screaming chorus ad think about everybody else's perspective and try to guess what they'll think of my approach??? only on DCUM. gaaaaawd this is unbelievable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Totally this. I've got 3 kids, 6, 3, and 13 months, and I never put up with any screaming antics at restaurants, be it McDonald's or the Ritz. If the kids act up, they get the MOMMY stink eye, which is pretty powerful. If they decide to defy me after that, their butts are whisked out until they calm down and get their act together. There's no reason a bratty child should upset other people's time to enjoy eating their meal. And putting an iPhone/movie in front of the child is a quick band-aid, I get that, but what about the bigger picture here? The child needs to understand that screaming is unacceptable at restaurants, period. If the parents don't get that, and aren't willing to teach their children that, then they should just order take-out or delivery. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Next time, remove your kid, take her outside, to the car and you will avoid the stinky eye. Simple.
and you'll hold my infant for me?
note that DH tries to help but infant and toddler are going through a phase that both will only be content on mom's lap. we're still adjusting. we can try to reason with the toddler but as some of you know it doesn't help. and unless DH is wearing a shirt bathed in breastmilk and my swat the infant won't stop screaming on his lap.
Take loud, obnoxious toddler out in the car (also infant if DH is incapable), let DH eat then come relieve you in the car so you can come back in and eat. Take some food in the car and let loud, obnoxious toddler eat in the car. Quite simple, really.
This is, of course, because "eating and leaving were NOT options".
Oh, and get over yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Next time, remove your kid, take her outside, to the car and you will avoid the stinky eye. Simple.
and you'll hold my infant for me?
note that DH tries to help but infant and toddler are going through a phase that both will only be content on mom's lap. we're still adjusting. we can try to reason with the toddler but as some of you know it doesn't help. and unless DH is wearing a shirt bathed in breastmilk and my swat the infant won't stop screaming on his lap.
Anonymous wrote:You made me lol there. If you think a crying kid is disturbing the peace in such a way as to put that law in your post, you must be one of those people who bitches about everyone in public.
Anonymous wrote:
did you miss the part where i explained that i was embarrassed and actually doing something to make my child stop? not eating or going home was not an option. sorry.
Anonymous wrote:It's chipotle. Sorry but anyone there has already given up on civilization. When you go to mcdonalds version of a Mexican restaurant youngive up the right to complain. About anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did you or anyone defending you ever stop to think of how your actions looked to the other customers around you? From your own initial post, you had a child being loud, running around, and crying at your table. Then you proceed to take the phone away from the child, causing even louder screaming, and walk towards the door while saying "I'll be right back." No matter what your reasons, it looked like a parent with a screaming/crying child was leaving the table so they could go make a phone call, not trying to deal with the issues. In that situation, of course you are going to get the stink eye. Your follow-up posts show that you didn't seem to think that anything mattered except for your own opinion and entitlements, and you are completely oblivious to how others would have perceived the same situation from the outside. Sorry, but next time, take the child outside with you until they quiet down. Your rights are not unlimited. They end where the rights of others begin. That's the whole point behind laws such as "disturbing the peace" and "public nuisance". You can do what you want up until it starts to interfere with the ability of others to do the same.
I think it's just the OP posting over and over.
Anonymous wrote:OP, did you or anyone defending you ever stop to think of how your actions looked to the other customers around you? From your own initial post, you had a child being loud, running around, and crying at your table. Then you proceed to take the phone away from the child, causing even louder screaming, and walk towards the door while saying "I'll be right back." No matter what your reasons, it looked like a parent with a screaming/crying child was leaving the table so they could go make a phone call, not trying to deal with the issues. In that situation, of course you are going to get the stink eye. Your follow-up posts show that you didn't seem to think that anything mattered except for your own opinion and entitlements, and you are completely oblivious to how others would have perceived the same situation from the outside. Sorry, but next time, take the child outside with you until they quiet down. Your rights are not unlimited. They end where the rights of others begin. That's the whole point behind laws such as "disturbing the peace" and "public nuisance". You can do what you want up until it starts to interfere with the ability of others to do the same.
Anonymous wrote:OP, did you or anyone defending you ever stop to think of how your actions looked to the other customers around you? From your own initial post, you had a child being loud, running around, and crying at your table. Then you proceed to take the phone away from the child, causing even louder screaming, and walk towards the door while saying "I'll be right back." No matter what your reasons, it looked like a parent with a screaming/crying child was leaving the table so they could go make a phone call, not trying to deal with the issues. In that situation, of course you are going to get the stink eye. Your follow-up posts show that you didn't seem to think that anything mattered except for your own opinion and entitlements, and you are completely oblivious to how others would have perceived the same situation from the outside. Sorry, but next time, take the child outside with you until they quiet down. Your rights are not unlimited. They end where the rights of others begin. That's the whole point behind laws such as "disturbing the peace" and "public nuisance". You can do what you want up until it starts to interfere with the ability of others to do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, if anyone gave me the stink eye I would laugh really loud in their face.
That said, tend to any crying individual immediately, regardless of age! Do you blame the child for not wanting to sit there? Call me what you will, but Dh and I did not go to restaurants until the children were old enough to grasp manners. It depends on the child, but it is NOT infant or toddler age.
Totally this. I've got 3 kids, 6, 3, and 13 months, and I never put up with any screaming antics at restaurants, be it McDonald's or the Ritz. If the kids act up, they get the MOMMY stink eye, which is pretty powerful. If they decide to defy me after that, their butts are whisked out until they calm down and get their act together. There's no reason a bratty child should upset other people's time to enjoy eating their meal. And putting an iPhone/movie in front of the child is a quick band-aid, I get that, but what about the bigger picture here? The child needs to understand that screaming is unacceptable at restaurants, period. If the parents don't get that, and aren't willing to teach their children that, then they should just order take-out or delivery. Sheesh.
i wonder what kind of manners your 13mo old knows... and once my newborn is old enough to sit in his stroller quietly and all this mastitis/thrush goes away i promise you i'll put more effort into teaching manners to my toddler. for now, just out of childbirth and feeling so ill, i'll go with the flow. a full tummy and weather appropriate clothing are my goals for now.
New poster here. Only a woman who thinks the world cares about her "mastitis and thrush" would write a response like this. And why the hell are you feeling ill? Do you think the guy at the next table cares that poor you feels ill because you have a BABY? Get over yourself.