Anonymous wrote:The disparity of pay among physicians is what is criminal. It's all part of a skewed reimbursement system that values procedures more than cognition and actually taking care of patients. And it incentives itself by just ensuring that more procedures are done, some unnecessarily because they pay so much. The technical skills and training to be a critical care doctor and a spine surgeon are not that different. And one doesn't work harder than the other. But one makes 5 times more. Or even 10 times more. It's ridiculous. And some of it is sour grapes, sure. But it's difficult when you see the same guy in the middle of the night and he makes orders of magnitude higher than you because of reimbursement schemes set up decades ago. When he's not working harder than you and didn't train any harder. Stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of the MDs should make more than these overpaid attorneys running around here. Thinking of attorneys in large firms and independent financial regulatory agencies.
Doctors should be paid more. Hospitals and insurance companies should earn less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All of the MDs should make more than these overpaid attorneys running around here. Thinking of attorneys in large firms and independent financial regulatory agencies.
Doctors should be paid more. Hospitals and insurance companies should earn less.
Anonymous wrote:All of the MDs should make more than these overpaid attorneys running around here. Thinking of attorneys in large firms and independent financial regulatory agencies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Icu is definitely underpaid - ER docs can consult every service for admit, but command high (>300/hr) salaries, whereas pure critical care guys (without pulm clinic or anesthesia time) might make 150/hr on a shift. Criminal? No. Market driven? Yes, and we need more of that in medicine.
Neurosurgeons are paid well for skill and rarity - they don't train many of them. Meanwhile, midlevels are taking over primary care, driving salaries down. The answer isn't to beg the govt for more cheese, it's to allow marlet forces in - and many of the "direct primary care" cash models have PCPs making 4-500k per year with zero call.
We need more salaries post on this thread. We also need less jealousy. Kudos to the spine surgeon making $1 mil a year - I couldn't deal with those patients. That guy had to kill it in Med school to get ortho, although spine is actually not a competitive fellowship out of ortho. Tons of unfilled spots.
Enjoy the 7 digits while you can - billing reimbursement under the regime is likely to decimate spine, and I wouldn't do it for $1 mil a year - who would do it for 300?
Medicine is rarely market driven. As you said, if it were PCP's in some places would be earning a lot more. It's all circular. Certain specialties and procedures reimburse more for arbitrary reasons set up long ago. Those specialties become competitive because the reimburse at a higher rate. Hospitals don't pay people based on market forces they compensate based on how they are reimbursed.
I have some friends that are in pediatric subspecialties. They trained for 6+ years, are incredibly smart, and work hard. That in and of itself doesn't mean they should be paid more. BUT, there is a shortage of docs in these fields, I know one that literally covers 5 states. months long waiting list and full clinics. And these specialists are super rare as well. Under any other system, these people's salaries would increase to get more people into the field. But since reimbursement is kept arbitrarily low, no one will pay an increased salary. It's crazy. And this happen all the time. Which leads us with a glut of specialists who need to do more and more (sometimes unnecessary) procedures to justify their high salaries and not enough doctors who would actually make the population healthier in the long run.
I disagree with some of your argument, but you have my wholehearted agreement that Peds sub specialists are under paid.
This is what happens when the government inserts itself into a private industry. It's only going to worsen under Obamacare.
I do not recommend medicine as a career path for those who ask me. It is about to go the way of law in terms of high loan burden and lack of opportunities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Icu is definitely underpaid - ER docs can consult every service for admit, but command high (>300/hr) salaries, whereas pure critical care guys (without pulm clinic or anesthesia time) might make 150/hr on a shift. Criminal? No. Market driven? Yes, and we need more of that in medicine.
Neurosurgeons are paid well for skill and rarity - they don't train many of them. Meanwhile, midlevels are taking over primary care, driving salaries down. The answer isn't to beg the govt for more cheese, it's to allow marlet forces in - and many of the "direct primary care" cash models have PCPs making 4-500k per year with zero call.
We need more salaries post on this thread. We also need less jealousy. Kudos to the spine surgeon making $1 mil a year - I couldn't deal with those patients. That guy had to kill it in Med school to get ortho, although spine is actually not a competitive fellowship out of ortho. Tons of unfilled spots.
Enjoy the 7 digits while you can - billing reimbursement under the regime is likely to decimate spine, and I wouldn't do it for $1 mil a year - who would do it for 300?
Medicine is rarely market driven. As you said, if it were PCP's in some places would be earning a lot more. It's all circular. Certain specialties and procedures reimburse more for arbitrary reasons set up long ago. Those specialties become competitive because the reimburse at a higher rate. Hospitals don't pay people based on market forces they compensate based on how they are reimbursed.
I have some friends that are in pediatric subspecialties. They trained for 6+ years, are incredibly smart, and work hard. That in and of itself doesn't mean they should be paid more. BUT, there is a shortage of docs in these fields, I know one that literally covers 5 states. months long waiting list and full clinics. And these specialists are super rare as well. Under any other system, these people's salaries would increase to get more people into the field. But since reimbursement is kept arbitrarily low, no one will pay an increased salary. It's crazy. And this happen all the time. Which leads us with a glut of specialists who need to do more and more (sometimes unnecessary) procedures to justify their high salaries and not enough doctors who would actually make the population healthier in the long run.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The disparity of pay among physicians is what is criminal. It's all part of a skewed reimbursement system that values procedures more than cognition and actually taking care of patients. And it incentives itself by just ensuring that more procedures are done, some unnecessarily because they pay so much. The technical skills and training to be a critical care doctor and a spine surgeon are not that different. And one doesn't work harder than the other. But one makes 5 times more. Or even 10 times more. It's ridiculous. And some of it is sour grapes, sure. But it's difficult when you see the same guy in the middle of the night and he makes orders of magnitude higher than you because of reimbursement schemes set up decades ago. When he's not working harder than you and didn't train any harder. Stupid.
So you think neurosurgeons don't have more technical skills than a critical care doctor? I strongly disagree with you. Procedures and surgery require more skill and they get paid accordingly. Maybe you think a consult ending with a script is the same a a 7hr surgery.
I think that surgery is an important skill. One that I think most competent surgeons could be trained to do. It is highly technical. I am not disputing that. But keeping an ICU full of 30 critically ill patients alive for 24 hours is a highly technical skill too. That requires years of training to be able to do well. Not everyone can do that either, including many of the orthopedic surgeons we give gobs of money to. If you've ever been in a hospital and seen an orthopedic surgeon take care of medically ill patients you would know that's the case. And if you think running an ICU is the equivalent of a "consult ending with a script," then you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Just because it doesn't seem as cool on Grey's Anatomy doesn't mean that the thinking part of medicine is just as important or as difficult as the procedural part.
My son had surgery as an infant and spent many days in the PICU. Surgeon billed 20k of our 250k total bill. PICU bill was way higher than surgery cost. Don't know how that cost gets broken up between hospital and physicians but the billings were astronomical. Thank goodness we had good insurance or we would be bankrupt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The disparity of pay among physicians is what is criminal. It's all part of a skewed reimbursement system that values procedures more than cognition and actually taking care of patients. And it incentives itself by just ensuring that more procedures are done, some unnecessarily because they pay so much. The technical skills and training to be a critical care doctor and a spine surgeon are not that different. And one doesn't work harder than the other. But one makes 5 times more. Or even 10 times more. It's ridiculous. And some of it is sour grapes, sure. But it's difficult when you see the same guy in the middle of the night and he makes orders of magnitude higher than you because of reimbursement schemes set up decades ago. When he's not working harder than you and didn't train any harder. Stupid.
So you think neurosurgeons don't have more technical skills than a critical care doctor? I strongly disagree with you. Procedures and surgery require more skill and they get paid accordingly. Maybe you think a consult ending with a script is the same a a 7hr surgery.
I think that surgery is an important skill. One that I think most competent surgeons could be trained to do. It is highly technical. I am not disputing that. But keeping an ICU full of 30 critically ill patients alive for 24 hours is a highly technical skill too. That requires years of training to be able to do well. Not everyone can do that either, including many of the orthopedic surgeons we give gobs of money to. If you've ever been in a hospital and seen an orthopedic surgeon take care of medically ill patients you would know that's the case. And if you think running an ICU is the equivalent of a "consult ending with a script," then you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Just because it doesn't seem as cool on Grey's Anatomy doesn't mean that the thinking part of medicine is just as important or as difficult as the procedural part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The disparity of pay among physicians is what is criminal. It's all part of a skewed reimbursement system that values procedures more than cognition and actually taking care of patients. And it incentives itself by just ensuring that more procedures are done, some unnecessarily because they pay so much. The technical skills and training to be a critical care doctor and a spine surgeon are not that different. And one doesn't work harder than the other. But one makes 5 times more. Or even 10 times more. It's ridiculous. And some of it is sour grapes, sure. But it's difficult when you see the same guy in the middle of the night and he makes orders of magnitude higher than you because of reimbursement schemes set up decades ago. When he's not working harder than you and didn't train any harder. Stupid.
So you think neurosurgeons don't have more technical skills than a critical care doctor? I strongly disagree with you. Procedures and surgery require more skill and they get paid accordingly. Maybe you think a consult ending with a script is the same a a 7hr surgery.
I think that surgery is an important skill. One that I think most competent surgeons could be trained to do. It is highly technical. I am not disputing that. But keeping an ICU full of 30 critically ill patients alive for 24 hours is a highly technical skill too. That requires years of training to be able to do well. Not everyone can do that either, including many of the orthopedic surgeons we give gobs of money to. If you've ever been in a hospital and seen an orthopedic surgeon take care of medically ill patients you would know that's the case. And if you think running an ICU is the equivalent of a "consult ending with a script," then you don't know what the hell you're talking about. Just because it doesn't seem as cool on Grey's Anatomy doesn't mean that the thinking part of medicine is just as important or as difficult as the procedural part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The disparity of pay among physicians is what is criminal. It's all part of a skewed reimbursement system that values procedures more than cognition and actually taking care of patients. And it incentives itself by just ensuring that more procedures are done, some unnecessarily because they pay so much. The technical skills and training to be a critical care doctor and a spine surgeon are not that different. And one doesn't work harder than the other. But one makes 5 times more. Or even 10 times more. It's ridiculous. And some of it is sour grapes, sure. But it's difficult when you see the same guy in the middle of the night and he makes orders of magnitude higher than you because of reimbursement schemes set up decades ago. When he's not working harder than you and didn't train any harder. Stupid.
So you think neurosurgeons don't have more technical skills than a critical care doctor? I strongly disagree with you. Procedures and surgery require more skill and they get paid accordingly. Maybe you think a consult ending with a script is the same a a 7hr surgery.