Anonymous wrote:This thread has been amusing. Just me, but I fall into the "feed your guests" camp. Now, that doesn't mean a full-blown meal, but definitely what adults would call "heavy hor d'oevres". It's a party! And if your kid is like my 3yo (a bottomless pit), even if he's had a snack before going he'll be hungry. For his 3yo party (held 2pm until 5pm or so) which had a small mix of adults and kids, we did chips and dip, cheese and crackers, chicken nuggets, subs cut into small slices, mixed fruit bowl, veggies and dip, one other item I can't remember, and cake. Some kids (and parents) ate a lot, some not so much. All of this was from Giant, so it didn't break the bank.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:22:03, I would be fine with what you're offering at that hour.
do you have a 3yo?
i think many parents on this forum have children who are different ages. my child and most all other kids we know eat dinner around 5-5:30. bedtime routine starts at 7. if the party ends at 6, we'd be home around 6:30 and need to start dinner then. that is way late for a 3yo.
before i had kids, i would never eat dinner before 7. as far as i can remember, i ate dinner with my parents around 7. it is different with young children. they often have different schedules.
Anonymous wrote:OK, DCUMers.
I'm planning a 3 YO birthday party at my house from 4-6pm. We're on a budget so we tried to limit the number of kids and parents; however, because we invited whole families, we'll end up with around 8 3 year olds and various younger siblings and all the parents. I was planning on serving cake, snacks (cheese, crackers, vegetables, chips), and drinks. Are you all saying you'd expect a full dinner? We don't usually eat until after 7 so I never thought people would want a lot of food at this time (we couldn't do 2-4 because of nap schedules). We rarely eat pizza because our kids won't eat it, and I can't eat it. DC won't eat sandwiches except peanut butter, and I don't know enough about the health issues of the invitees to serve PB at a party anyway. In addition to not wanting to cater an entire meal, I'm afraid if we serve a real meal, there won't be time for the kids to play.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:22:03, I would be fine with what you're offering at that hour.
Anonymous wrote:OK, DCUMers.
I'm planning a 3 YO birthday party at my house from 4-6pm. We're on a budget so we tried to limit the number of kids and parents; however, because we invited whole families, we'll end up with around 8 3 year olds and various younger siblings and all the parents. I was planning on serving cake, snacks (cheese, crackers, vegetables, chips), and drinks. Are you all saying you'd expect a full dinner? We don't usually eat until after 7 so I never thought people would want a lot of food at this time (we couldn't do 2-4 because of nap schedules). We rarely eat pizza because our kids won't eat it, and I can't eat it. DC won't eat sandwiches except peanut butter, and I don't know enough about the health issues of the invitees to serve PB at a party anyway. In addition to not wanting to cater an entire meal, I'm afraid if we serve a real meal, there won't be time for the kids to play.
Thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there are two groups: one who think parties are about the host and the other who thinks it's about the guests. I think good hosting is about the guests. I'm honestly stunned that anyone would defend having a party from 12:30 to 2:00 without serving lunch, let alone a party for little kids.
And a third camp who think *kids* parties are about *kids* having fun, which may or may not involve food, and this is the Dumbest Thread Ever.
Amen.
If you don't want to serve the parents, fine. If it is a kid party, you should feed the kids!
Right, because that's what my kids care about when they go to a party. Not seeing their friends, playing together, games, entertainment, cake, etc. All they talk about is the food they did/didn't have!
Get over it, people. Anyone complaining about not serving food at a kid party is not thinking about it from the kids' perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there are two groups: one who think parties are about the host and the other who thinks it's about the guests. I think good hosting is about the guests. I'm honestly stunned that anyone would defend having a party from 12:30 to 2:00 without serving lunch, let alone a party for little kids.
And a third camp who think *kids* parties are about *kids* having fun, which may or may not involve food, and this is the Dumbest Thread Ever.
Amen.
If you don't want to serve the parents, fine. If it is a kid party, you should feed the kids!
Anonymous wrote:I went to a very lovely birthday party recently for a 4 YO with lots of parents and kids and siblings invited over lunch time (10:30 - 12:30, I think it was). The venue didn't allow pizza, and the family ordered trays of food from a local ethnic restaurant with lots of choices for everyone of all tastes and allergies. They're not well-off, but they wanted to throw a nice party for their friends and kid's friends! So refreshing and such great hosts. I thought it was very classy and generous that they did this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there are two groups: one who think parties are about the host and the other who thinks it's about the guests. I think good hosting is about the guests. I'm honestly stunned that anyone would defend having a party from 12:30 to 2:00 without serving lunch, let alone a party for little kids.
And a third camp who think *kids* parties are about *kids* having fun, which may or may not involve food, and this is the Dumbest Thread Ever.
Amen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there are two groups: one who think parties are about the host and the other who thinks it's about the guests. I think good hosting is about the guests. I'm honestly stunned that anyone would defend having a party from 12:30 to 2:00 without serving lunch, let alone a party for little kids.
And a third camp who think *kids* parties are about *kids* having fun, which may or may not involve food, and this is the Dumbest Thread Ever.