Anonymous wrote:This is an interpretation of the 14th amendment only. The supreme court has never ruled that this amendment is applicable to the children of illegal aliens. The framers of the 14th clearly stated that it should not apply to illegal alien children--that's why they included language about the person being under a "foreign power." Let the court make a ruling and if they refuse to follow common sense and rule of law then we need a national vote.
Anonymous wrote:This is an interpretation of the 14th amendment only. The supreme court has never ruled that this amendment is applicable to the children of illegal aliens. The framers of the 14th clearly stated that it should not apply to illegal alien children--that's why they included language about the person being under a "foreign power." Let the court make a ruling and if they refuse to follow common sense and rule of law then we need a national vote.
Anonymous wrote:This is an interpretation of the 14th amendment only. The supreme court has never ruled that this amendment is applicable to the children of illegal aliens. The framers of the 14th clearly stated that it should not apply to illegal alien children--that's why they included language about the person being under a "foreign power." Let the court make a ruling and if they refuse to follow common sense and rule of law then we need a national vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not at all uncomfortable. You cannot.reasonably equate the Holocost to America's need and right to protect its boarders. Your feeble attempt to make this connection does a disservice to every man, woman and child who were murdered in the Holocost. Antisemite.
First, it's Holocaust (and borders, but I digress). Second, you're the only one to mention the Holocaust. I merely pointed out that much of the rhetoric used in the immigration debate is similar to the rhetoric employed regarding Jews in 1930s Germany. If you don't believe me, go check for yourself. Whether it proceeds beyond rhetoric . . . well, I have faith in the majority of the American populace that it won't get there. (Note: that majority does not include you.)
Anonymous wrote:This is an interpretation of the 14th amendment only. The supreme court has never ruled that this amendment is applicable to the children of illegal aliens. The framers of the 14th clearly stated that it should not apply to illegal alien children--that's why they included language about the person being under a "foreign power." Let the court make a ruling and if they refuse to follow common sense and rule of law then we need a national vote.
Anonymous wrote:I am not at all uncomfortable. You cannot.reasonably equate the Holocost to America's need and right to protect its boarders. Your feeble attempt to make this connection does a disservice to every man, woman and child who were murdered in the Holocost. Antisemite.
Anonymous wrote:100% in favor of immigration, paperwork notwithstanding.
I know plenty of folks I suspect are without documentation, and they work much, MUCH harder than many U.S. born individuals, and instill better values in their "anchor babies". I live in a neighborhood with lots of immigrants and lots of generational poverty. We have a fair bit of crime. And probably 90% of it is caused by welfare-collecting natural-born Americans. I want a way to get rid of those leeches. Suggestions?
Anonymous wrote:The illegals violate civil law when they enter the US. Then, they violate criminal law when they obtain illegal documentation (forgery, identity left) and lie on their I-9 when they obtain employment. Illegals cannot live in the US without becoming criminals. They just start off civil law violators. So the use of "criminal" to describe illegal aliens is not inaccurate.