Anonymous wrote:While I don't quibble with those who choose private schools and are able to pay the tuition (I don't get choosing private when you can't afford it), I find the "logic" that "$30,000 isn't really $30,000 because it's only twice the public school . . . " silly. I get that some people feel the need to rationalize their choices, and that's too bad, but no need to call the $30,000 anything other than what it is -- $30,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is a real education? Why does a real education cost $30,000/year in your world? Does one have to spend $30,000/year at your child's school to get a "real" education? Preposterous faulty thinking in my opinion.
People like throwing around the $30,000 number and expressing shock that education should cost so much. But everyone forgets that at local public schools, the average spend is something like $15,000 or more per student, and many would agree that local public schools are underfunded. So if you want to put it in dollar terms, I think the real question is whether a private school education is twice as good as a public school education (and maybe less than that). I think for many families, the answer is yes.
Obviously the actual dollars spent by a private school family are much higher, because in addition to paying for private school education, they're also effectively subsidizing all the students in public schools by paying their taxes but not using the public school resources. But that extra subsidy cost isn't really relevant when you're trying to compare the relative value of two different educations on a dollar-cost basis.
Anonymous wrote:What is a real education? Why does a real education cost $30,000/year in your world? Does one have to spend $30,000/year at your child's school to get a "real" education? Preposterous faulty thinking in my opinion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm not sure to whom you are writing and what point you are making. As far as brand is concerned in the mid-1990s when I bought my car a FORD was a FORD and a TOYOTA was TOYOTA. I got a lousy return on my investment with the FORD. I got an excellent ROI with the TOYOTA. Education is no different.
Why would I spend $30,000/ year for an private primary school education in the D.C. area. This is a lousy ROI in my opinion. The public magnet schools are a far superior eduactional brand. Therefore, my children went to the public school magnets for primary education. There received a far superior return on that investment. "High-powered private primary school" does not equal superior education in the D.C. area. For those struggling with their underwater mortgages we have no reason to be part of the educational bubble and sentence our children to worthess underwater educational loans. Therefore, the choice of $45,000/year at Harvard may indeed be a better ROI thatn $35.000/year at Podunk University.
You say these things because you aren't very well-educated yourself and because you don't see any intrinsic value in education.
I am not the pp above, but really, how the heck would you know whether or not the poster is educated. You are just a bully and have no place in an open forum that is supposed to open up conversations, not discourage them
Anonymous wrote:Try, Acutely Spoiled Disorder
That's more like it in this part of town. Overly diagnosed and overly medicated brats like their parents (similar to the tobacco habits of the Marlboro generation)!
Try, Acutely Spoiled Disorder
Anonymous wrote:This thread is hysterical. OP asks a relatively educated & interesting question ("To what extent do the local elite private schools encourage their students to think for themselves & act independently?") and out come the most bizarre collection of responses. Like what, 2 people, have engaged in a substantive conversation on what should be an interesting topic to all of us?
So far, you all have accused OP of being a bad writer, a bad mother, not knowing her own child, caring more about a brand than a kid, pushing her kid harder than she should, being a jerk to people on DCUM, and hating the autistic. Because she asked whether you though your DC's schools encouraged them to think independently! OP, carry on. At least a few of us think you're the normal one.
I encourage you to look at schools outside Washington. The boarding schools are at a Secondary Schools Conference at Norwood next week. Might be worth investigating.
Anonymous wrote:
What you share is VERY interesting. May I ask : where does DH teach ? Myself I think I notice a HUGE change in the kids today too. I think I notice it more than others because I waited until late 30's to have a child. This means that my 60's and 70's era childhood is very different than my DC's. Not having freedom to roam as kids, I suspect is a big contributor to immaturity later. Doubly so, if you have a boy. I saw this played out in stark relief yesterday at a rainy Stoddard soccer game : A 9 year old boy was screaming at his mother "get me out of here,Mom". I guess he was cold, but seriously !!! "get me out of here" What is she a chauffer, a fixer. Put on a damn coat, run around, get back on the field anything....but OMG What the F**K is wrong with a kid like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I went to a Big 3 school and in many ways I was immature when I graduated (at 17, not 19). I chose the colleges I applied to based on proximity to skiing. But you know what? It all worked out very well in the end. I think the education I got in HS prepared me well for college and graduate school. I think 17 and 18 year olds are generally going to be immature in at least some ways whether they are at a big 3 school, big 10 school, great public school, crappy public school, whatever. In fact college bound kids at crappy public schools are probably the most mature because they have to be self motivated and independent and are much less likley to be helicoptered through life. So maybe that's where you need to be focusing your energy.
Our teenage DC so far are looking for: Division 1 sports, preferably ACC football (as a spectator, not player); great skiing at outdoor activities (thinking UColorado at Boulder); great city and shopping (thinking NYU or Georgetown); warm weather, good football (thinking a Florida state school); medical college on campus (thinking Florida, Pittsburgh or VCU). They all rank decent dining hall as important. That's what's important to them; what's important to you?
Would you mind sharing where you went to school and where your DC is currently a student. Again, not to generalize, but just trying to get a sense apart from what the AD's and the brochures tell you about a school. thanks
Is this because the post makes you want to apply to PP's son's school, or the opposite? Because everything about PP's (wonderful, i think, showing respect for her DC) post says a lot about the DC but nothing about his secondary school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I dunno -- "after 14 years of high-powered private schooling, did your kids turn out to be thoughtful and intellectually engaged people or exceptionally well-trained performing seals (and do you credit or blame the school or yourselves for this outcome)?" strikes me as a question someone might wonder about. And, for that matter, a question than many potential respondents might well take offense at. Mystery solved.
10 years into the process, DC seems firmly on the former path and I think that's because school and home reinforced each others' values. At least that's what I take away when I look at DC's schoolmates, some of whom are like DC, but most of whom aren't. Where I think school makes the most difference is when you have a kid whose personality or interests start(s) out different from his or her parents and who ends up at a school that's a good fit for the kid.
I'm not sure to whom you are writing and what point you are making. As far as brand is concerned in the mid-1990s when I bought my car a FORD was a FORD and a TOYOTA was TOYOTA. I got a lousy return on my investment with the FORD. I got an excellent ROI with the TOYOTA. Education is no different.
Why would I spend $30,000/ year for an private primary school education in the D.C. area. This is a lousy ROI in my opinion. The public magnet schools are a far superior eduactional brand. Therefore, my children went to the public school magnets for primary education. There received a far superior return on that investment. "High-powered private primary school" does not equal superior education in the D.C. area. For those struggling with their underwater mortgages we have no reason to be part of the educational bubble and sentence our children to worthess underwater educational loans. Therefore, the choice of $45,000/year at Harvard may indeed be a better ROI thatn $35.000/year at Podunk University.
You say these things because you aren't very well-educated yourself and because you don't see any intrinsic value in education.
Anonymous wrote:PP- My DH teaches some courses at a MD state university. I didn't believe him when he told me about parents emailing him until he showed me the emails. It happens every semester. He said that some of the parents are outraged that he won't discuss their child's grades, etc with them. They go on and on about how they are paying the bill so they should be kept "in the loop" about their child. He also told me that they have to push the parents off campus during freshman move-in/orientation. They have a separate orientation for them b/c parents would hover in their kids' dorm rooms and apts. The RAs at the school where he teaches give out business cards w/ their names and contact info to parents b/c parents demand to know what is going on with their child. Of course, this isn't all parents but that is crazy to me.