Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AYes, it would be so much more comfy to see it all in place waiting for the likes of us to finally "jump in the boat" - or the bandwagon as the case may be. But there is one significant upside to being among the first to jump. You get to steer!
(So what's the next foreign language gonna be, French or Chinese?)
IThus, the question should be "what's the next foreign language gonna be, Spanish or Chinese?" Good question. Spanish is more practical, Chinese has more cachet. There's a big market for Spanish in DC, and on the Hill, Tyler is filling it, so my vote would be Spanish. Let Yu Ying figure out Chinese middle school.
Anonymous wrote:A Maury parent here: I think anyone frequenting this discussion with kids in testing grades at Brent, Maury, and Tyler, throw in Ludlow-Taylor and J.O. Wilson, add Payne and Miner (anyone out there?), and, heck, why not Two Rivers, which I don't think has a viable middle school option either (am I wrong?), should know from experience how, in many ways, surprisingly little it actually takes to turn a school around. And how oblivious we ES parents may indeed all be to what's already happening on the ground. Many of the very people who introduced us to Maury some significant years back just before sending their kids off to Hardy because they didn't trust Eliot-Hine are actually now banking on Eliot-Hine. Their Hardy kids transfer to Eastern HS. Their educational sensors are sharp, not clouded by color. I followed their lead once, I can follow them twice.
Yes, it would be so much more comfy to see it all in place waiting for the likes of us to finally "jump in the boat" - or the bandwagon as the case may be. But there is one significant upside to being among the first to jump. You get to steer!
(So what's the next foreign language gonna be, French or Chinese?)
Anonymous wrote:A Maury parent here: I think anyone frequenting this discussion with kids in testing grades at Brent, Maury, and Tyler, throw in Ludlow-Taylor and J.O. Wilson, add Payne and Miner (anyone out there?), and, heck, why not Two Rivers, which I don't think has a viable middle school option either (am I wrong?), should know from experience how, in many ways, surprisingly little it actually takes to turn a school around. And how oblivious we ES parents may indeed all be to what's already happening on the ground. Many of the very people who introduced us to Maury some significant years back just before sending their kids off to Hardy because they didn't trust Eliot-Hine are actually now banking on Eliot-Hine. Their Hardy kids transfer to Eastern HS. Their educational sensors are sharp, not clouded by color. I followed their lead once, I can follow them twice.
Yes, it would be so much more comfy to see it all in place waiting for the likes of us to finally "jump in the boat" - or the bandwagon as the case may be. But there is one significant upside to being among the first to jump. You get to steer! (So what's the next foreign language gonna be, French or Chinese?)
Anonymous wrote: Down the road the near South East community and Van Ness could help Jefferson - but that is a long way off. Say in 2015 it opens as preS, preK and K. In 2012 Van Ness kids would be at Jefferson. Brent parents need a viable option next year and the year after. I'd rather peg my hopes with Tyler and Maury (and I know these schools well and I'm not riding any unicorns) than Jefferson because I have a 2nd grader. I think Brent needs to jump on the Elite Hine thing and work with the other ward 6 schools that have parent involvement now and move away from Jefferson. I just don't see how Jefferson can work in the near term.
I meant 2020.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Down the road the near South East community and Van Ness could help Jefferson - but that is a long way off. Say in 2015 it opens as preS, preK and K. In 2012 Van Ness kids would be at Jefferson. Brent parents need a viable option next year and the year after. I'd rather peg my hopes with Tyler and Maury (and I know these schools well and I'm not riding any unicorns) than Jefferson because I have a 2nd grader. I think Brent needs to jump on the Elite Hine thing and work with the other ward 6 schools that have parent involvement now and move away from Jefferson. I just don't see how Jefferson can work in the near term.
I meant 2020
Anonymous wrote:Down the road the near South East community and Van Ness could help Jefferson - but that is a long way off. Say in 2015 it opens as preS, preK and K. In 2012 Van Ness kids would be at Jefferson. Brent parents need a viable option next year and the year after. I'd rather peg my hopes with Tyler and Maury (and I know these schools well and I'm not riding any unicorns) than Jefferson because I have a 2nd grader. I think Brent needs to jump on the Elite Hine thing and work with the other ward 6 schools that have parent involvement now and move away from Jefferson. I just don't see how Jefferson can work in the near term.
Anonymous wrote:"The Van Ness building is currently occupied and if it's good enough for adults it's be good enough for kids."
Maybe for your kid. Not for mine. Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:Van Ness at 5th & M St, SE. Across from the Navy Yard. One mile south of its current location.
Van Ness ES closed five years ago. The building is in good shape with capacity for over 400. Almost a thousand new row homes (family sized) and thousands of new domiciles - some of them in old munitions buildings. The area is teaming with strollers and a diverse Hope Six community.
Ward Six should offer to reduce its inventory by two expensive schools (Jefferson & Stuart Hobson) and we ask for one inexpensive school (based on per pupil funding). We right size our inventory, save modernization & operating funds, and its a winnable political argument.
Anonymous wrote:but it's in Ward 3!