Anonymous wrote:Bashing the tea party is not going to work. You have every reason to fear them. They are going to defeat the left. They are the new anti-establishment movement. It's fun to watch drive the establishment crazy! The increasing power is amazing.
Anonymous wrote:Bashing the tea party is not going to work. You have every reason to fear them. They are going to defeat the left. They are the new anti-establishment movement. It's fun to watch drive the establishment crazy! The increasing power is amazing.
Anonymous wrote:You know, I disagree. I think the Teabaggers see what the country has turned into *socially* (e.g. gay marriage, black presidents, and women bosses) and they're repulsed. They "want their country back". They see an economic convulsion--much more extreme than the one we're experiencing--as something to be embraced, not avoided. They look at it as a kind of chemotherapy: lots of upheaval in the short-run, but necessary to remove the cancer from the body politic. They're quite sure that <i>they</i> are the ones who will come out least scathed. It's the reason there's so much overlap between Teabaggers and "survivalists". There's a part of them that just wants to burn the whole damned thing down. Because if we fix things, we'll just be back to gay people holding hands in public and the War on Christmas.
TheManWithAUsername wrote:The stupid wing of the GOP - you know in their hearts they regret their mistakes, but instead of admitting it, they'll just charge into the next thing.
Anonymous wrote:as long as money printing is occuring, it will go up, when interest rates increase and there is tightening, it will go down. The world is on the edge of collapse, bondholders are now aware they are last in line and will be "paid back" with battered dollars. If there is growth or real and serious budget cuts Gold will get hammered. Until that time....
Anonymous wrote:TheManWithAUsername wrote:Crazy defeatist talk. The world will always need shiny trinkets - how could the price go down?
I hope that was sarcasm. Because of course those of us old enough to remember know that gold was over $2000 an ounce in 1980, adjusted for inflation. And of course it plummeted later on.
TheManWithAUsername wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the U.S. is AAA. I suggest buying gold.
Man, I wish I could get on the other end of that trade.
Seriously, after the tech bubble burst, we wondered what the next bubble would be. Then came the suburban real-estate bubble. When that burst, folks wondered what the next bubble would be. I think we have our answer.
Crazy defeatist talk. The world will always need shiny trinkets - how could the price go down?