Anonymous wrote:Fool! Your control freak is showing again!
I am replying to this above FOOL....who has replied back to my post. ....
It is not controlling but causes problems for others who want to search for WISC scores in this thread. So don;t act like Fool.
Anonymous wrote:Hi, I just got back from my interview and here is my daughters FSIQ 138. She had a cogat of 128 and a NNAT of 134. What do you think her chances are with a GBRS of 9.
Anonymous wrote:Hi, I just got back from my interview and here is my daughters FSIQ 138. She had a cogat of 128 and a NNAT of 134. What do you think her chances are with a GBRS of 9.
Anonymous wrote:******************************************************
WHY YOU ARE TALKING OTHER THAN WISC SCORES HERE ?????
******************************************************
Anonymous wrote:******************************************************
WHY YOU ARE TALKING OTHER THAN WISC SCORES HERE ?????
******************************************************
Anonymous wrote:we didn't need to do a WISC so I don't know anything about it. I do know you pays your money and you takes your chances.
Even if it is a good test (for IQ), I don't see why it alone would outweigh the CogAt and GBRS score.
Anonymous wrote:Totally agree with 11:11! This thread is supposed to be about WISC scores (and appeals). A PP offered the opinion that if a child wasn't found eligible the first time around, just give it up. It occured to me that the PP may be wanting to dissuade others from appealing and getting into the program? If the WISC shows that a child is gifted (and the WISC is apparently considered more informative in that regard than the NNAT/CogAT) then it would seem to provide ample support for concluding that the child is in fact a strong candidate for the AAP.