Anonymous wrote:Hey you can move to sodom and gomorrah and spray some frabreeze around, but don't ask the rest of us to call it great and treat it like traditional marriage. We don't want to and you can't make us.
Anonymous wrote:Do the words sodom and gommorah mean anything to you. Where did the word sodomy come from? Doesn't God and his dumb followers know of the beauty and majesty of the penis rectum relationship? I'm sure you can convince the almighty of his ignorance and educate him about where true human happiness and fulfillment cum from.
Really so you do not eat pork or shellfish. In the OT god's people went into a pit of fire because they would not defy this law.
I know you have already written out God's name and must be going to hell for that.
Do you still believe that the death penalty is God's will if you disobey your parents?
If you found out your wife was not a virgin at marriage, would you do your duty and stone her?
Anonymous wrote:Do the words sodom and gommorah mean anything to you. Where did the word sodomy come from? Doesn't God and his dumb followers know of the beauty and majesty of the penis rectum relationship? I'm sure you can convince the almighty of his ignorance and educate him about where true human happiness and fulfillment cum from.
Anonymous wrote:. It is all over the old testament and no sin in the old testament is not a sin in the new testament. The law was set in the old testament. Many sins in the law are not ticked off by Jesus, his message was that there was now a new way to be cleansed and forgiven. It's all about understanding how short we all fall and clinging to the lord. The audience Jesus taught was well aware and highly educated in Gods law.Anonymous wrote:Ok so where is the new testament case against homosexuality?
Anonymous wrote:. Matthew was the tax collector, Paul was a murderer. The operable word you used is "former". Everybody falls short. People who believe and make a u turn from sin are what Jesus died for.Anonymous wrote:Ok make the case that it is a sin based in the new testament. I bet your only hope is Paul, a former tax collector.Anonymous wrote:good luck convincing God and faithful people that homosexualty isn't a sin. I'm sure lucifer would be happy to argue the case though.
Anonymous wrote:Here is a sin: Ignoring the First Amendment and demanding that civil law coincide with your religious beliefs. No, excuse me, that's not a sin, "sin" is a religious term that has no place in a discussion of the law.
What is it then? It's an insult to the Constitution!
Now please follow Jesus and render unto Caesar...
. It is all over the old testament and no sin in the old testament is not a sin in the new testament. The law was set in the old testament. Many sins in the law are not ticked off by Jesus, his message was that there was now a new way to be cleansed and forgiven. It's all about understanding how short we all fall and clinging to the lord. The audience Jesus taught was well aware and highly educated in Gods law.Anonymous wrote:Ok so where is the new testament case against homosexuality?
Untrue. It is am sdvantage in times of scarcity. There are lots of genes that hang around because they are useful in adversity.Anonymous wrote:. Making a good case that homosexuality is a choice. If it wasn't the gene would be at a severe disadvantage and weeded out in few generations . As a Hetero, I could never finish with a man yuck!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sure as heck isn't genetics. It would be the first gene weeded out of the gene pool unless you don't believe in Darwin, natural selection or evolution.
Not true. Almost every gay person I know my age (45) or older has at least one biological child. I have many friends with gay fathers in particular. They had to live the lie, and have had to do so for most of history.
. Not many people object to civil unions. It is the attempt to sanctify homosexuality with the word "marriage" people object to.Anonymous wrote:Here is a sin: Ignoring the First Amendment and demanding that civil law coincide with your religious beliefs. No, excuse me, that's not a sin, "sin" is a religious term that has no place in a discussion of the law.
What is it then? It's an insult to the Constitution!
Now please follow Jesus and render unto Caesar...