Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was in school, disruptive kids were not much of an issue because the school and the teachers were extremely good at managing them. If there was a disruption, the teacher could remove the child quickly from the classroom and the lesson would continue.
My experience with private schools nowadays, through my child, has been very different. I see several disruptive kids who are not being effectively managed by the teacher, and those kids are eventually expelled.
So my question is: which approach is better overall? To me, there seems to be a trend toward shifting responsibility for classroom management from the teacher to the students. What do you think?
You idiot. Not the teacher's fault. It is the parents.
Anonymous wrote:When I was in school, disruptive kids were not much of an issue because the school and the teachers were extremely good at managing them. If there was a disruption, the teacher could remove the child quickly from the classroom and the lesson would continue.
My experience with private schools nowadays, through my child, has been very different. I see several disruptive kids who are not being effectively managed by the teacher, and those kids are eventually expelled.
So my question is: which approach is better overall? To me, there seems to be a trend toward shifting responsibility for classroom management from the teacher to the students. What do you think?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's not the kid. Many times it's other people's kid that sets off the kid. Many times it's admin who blame the teachers instead of the kid. They fire the teachers for not fraud g the kids data to make them look good.
The PARENTS! Always the parents. If there is consistent disruptive behavior that has nothing to do with having a disability, then something is going on at home. ALWAYS!!!
+ 1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's not the kid. Many times it's other people's kid that sets off the kid. Many times it's admin who blame the teachers instead of the kid. They fire the teachers for not fraud g the kids data to make them look good.
The PARENTS! Always the parents. If there is consistent disruptive behavior that has nothing to do with having a disability, then something is going on at home. ALWAYS!!!
Or there is nothing going on at home. No rules, no discipline. Kids who never hear “no”
Anonymous wrote:hands down, the parents. as a parent myself and not a teacher, i am convinced many parents are not teaching their kids how to be empathetic, community oriented people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's not the kid. Many times it's other people's kid that sets off the kid. Many times it's admin who blame the teachers instead of the kid. They fire the teachers for not fraud g the kids data to make them look good.
The PARENTS! Always the parents. If there is consistent disruptive behavior that has nothing to do with having a disability, then something is going on at home. ALWAYS!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's not the kid. Many times it's other people's kid that sets off the kid. Many times it's admin who blame the teachers instead of the kid. They fire the teachers for not fraud g the kids data to make them look good.
The PARENTS! Always the parents. If there is consistent disruptive behavior that has nothing to do with having a disability, then something is going on at home. ALWAYS!!!
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's not the kid. Many times it's other people's kid that sets off the kid. Many times it's admin who blame the teachers instead of the kid. They fire the teachers for not fraud g the kids data to make them look good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kid. Always the kid.
A child is not their actions. Never the kid. Look at parents, teacher, school and classroom climate, and society. All behaviors are from unmet needs and/or underdeveloped social and emotional competencies.