Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there perfect physics down to the stone and then subatomic particles? Why are their physical universes that follow patterns? Why are there tiny cells with amazing functions? Believing all this happened at random takes faith. Believing all this is knitted together by God takes faith. At least the later has the Bible as evidence and the places and events of the Bible are traced.
It does not take any faith whatsoever.
All of the physics things are explained by the big bang. If evidence is found of a better explanation, we'll switch to that one.
All of those biological things are explained by evolution, with the exception of abiogenesis, and there is mountains of evidence explaining how that might have happened.
Asking how it "happened" implies there was a before it happened. There is no evidence of that, and no reason to think there was. It's quite likely time began with the big bang so there was nothing for it to come from.
None of this is simple, but it is all easy to believe once you understand.
You know what is hard to believe? A magic man in the sky who existed forever outside of time but then decided to create time and everything in it on a nearly infinite scale but place his personal fishtank on the third stone from a sun in the corner of one of billions of galaxies. And he stays hidden except for a short while to a bunch of illiterate shepherds 2 millennia before mass media. And he allowed thousands of similar stories of gods to exist but those are all false and just his is true.
That is the definition of preposterous.
DP: What religion believes in a "magic man in the sky"?
It isn't useful to be lazy and rude with straw man arguments (unless you are actually ignorant of theology and think the greatest theologians of our time really believe the space shuttle might pass by a man with a white beard sitting on a cloud, in which case maybe learn what something is before arguing about what it isn't.)
All of these discussions can be fast forwarded to the point where science, math, philosphy and theology stop having answers and start have theories.
The big bang theory is generally agreed to be that point, a theory first articulated by a Jesuit priest, so it is not anti-theological.
The discussions that start there are fascinating and worthy; none will claim to know the answers.
Some will theorize that everthing came from nothing, others will theorize that based on everything we know, that is impossible, so there had to be something. Some will call that something God, others will reject a God theory and call it "Something-but-not-God."
Another worthy question is even though we can't know, how should we live? And how should what we do know inform our living?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there perfect physics down to the stone and then subatomic particles? Why are their physical universes that follow patterns? Why are there tiny cells with amazing functions? Believing all this happened at random takes faith. Believing all this is knitted together by God takes faith. At least the later has the Bible as evidence and the places and events of the Bible are traced.
It does not take any faith whatsoever.
All of the physics things are explained by the big bang. If evidence is found of a better explanation, we'll switch to that one.
All of those biological things are explained by evolution, with the exception of abiogenesis, and there is mountains of evidence explaining how that might have happened.
Asking how it "happened" implies there was a before it happened. There is no evidence of that, and no reason to think there was. It's quite likely time began with the big bang so there was nothing for it to come from.
None of this is simple, but it is all easy to believe once you understand.
You know what is hard to believe? A magic man in the sky who existed forever outside of time but then decided to create time and everything in it on a nearly infinite scale but place his personal fishtank on the third stone from a sun in the corner of one of billions of galaxies. And he stays hidden except for a short while to a bunch of illiterate shepherds 2 millennia before mass media. And he allowed thousands of similar stories of gods to exist but those are all false and just his is true.
That is the definition of preposterous.
Anonymous wrote:People with weak minds believe in that BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One person chooses to believe there is a God. You choose to believe there isn't one. You can't prove either stance, theirs or yours.
Religion is not merely “choosing to believe in God.” I believe in a higher power or energy of some kind. But religion is gobbledygook.
Religion is a belief in things like someone living inside a whale for 3 days, a great flood that wiped out much of early humanity, a crucified man being resurrected after 3 days, earth being created in six days, martyrs getting 72 virgins, a hidden army licking a wall, etc.
It’s so fantastical that people just make up rationalizations for how it’s just an interpretation or whatever and then religious councils will come together and create their own new interpretations over time. It’s like a little kid who keeps making up new rules to a nonsensical board game.
You should really look into the beliefs of religions other than your own (presumably you believe those religions are wrong if yours is the true one). That is how your religious beliefs sound to many others.
Anonymous wrote:
Religion is like love. The heart wants what the heart wants, it's not rational.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Even just using Christianity, it doesn't make sense that God first appeared to the Jews many thousands of years after people existed and only to this one tribe of people, but then he brought a son down to earth but somehow didn't convince the jews despite this fulfilling his original plan they should have been on board with. And then somehow also influenced the Muslim world and the Muslims and Christians for most of the time after Jesus hated jews. And then his new religion splintered into hundreds of churches.. Its all so ridiculous. These religions are just myths from the time period and culture they came from. They have no flow from one century to the next.
At least get your facts straight before you call anything ridiculous. Jesus didn't hate Jews--he was a Jew and always saw himself as a Jew. Islam sees Jesus as a prophet and views itself as representing his true message (Christians disagree). So a fair amount of continuity. And Judaism and Islam have also split into many sects each.
Whatever your background, we get that you hate Christianity specifically, lol. You look sort of ridiculous yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Even just using Christianity, it doesn't make sense that God first appeared to the Jews many thousands of years after people existed and only to this one tribe of people, but then he brought a son down to earth but somehow didn't convince the jews despite this fulfilling his original plan they should have been on board with. And then somehow also influenced the Muslim world and the Muslims and Christians for most of the time after Jesus hated jews. And then his new religion splintered into hundreds of churches.. Its all so ridiculous. These religions are just myths from the time period and culture they came from. They have no flow from one century to the next.
Anonymous wrote:Even just using Christianity, it doesn't make sense that God first appeared to the Jews many thousands of years after people existed and only to this one tribe of people, but then he brought a son down to earth but somehow didn't convince the jews despite this fulfilling his original plan they should have been on board with. And then somehow also influenced the Muslim world and the Muslims and Christians for most of the time after Jesus hated jews. And then his new religion splintered into hundreds of churches.. It's all so ridiculous. These religions are just myths from the time period and culture they came from. They have no flow from century to century.
Anonymous wrote:It's all theory. An attempt to explain our world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there perfect physics down to the stone and then subatomic particles? Why are their physical universes that follow patterns? Why are there tiny cells with amazing functions? Believing all this happened at random takes faith. Believing all this is knitted together by God takes faith. At least the later has the Bible as evidence and the places and events of the Bible are traced.
It does not take any faith whatsoever.
All of the physics things are explained by the big bang. If evidence is found of a better explanation, we'll switch to that one.
All of those biological things are explained by evolution, with the exception of abiogenesis, and there is mountains of evidence explaining how that might have happened.
Asking how it "happened" implies there was a before it happened. There is no evidence of that, and no reason to think there was. It's quite likely time began with the big bang so there was nothing for it to come from.
None of this is simple, but it is all easy to believe once you understand.
You know what is hard to believe? A magic man in the sky who existed forever outside of time but then decided to create time and everything in it on a nearly infinite scale but place his personal fishtank on the third stone from a sun in the corner of one of billions of galaxies. And he stays hidden except for a short while to a bunch of illiterate shepherds 2 millennia before mass media. And he allowed thousands of similar stories of gods to exist but those are all false and just his is true.
That is the definition of preposterous.
Oh, nonsense. We have good Physics explanations from a very very short time after the big bang until now. We have no widely accepted Physics explanation for the big bang itself or its creation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there perfect physics down to the stone and then subatomic particles? Why are their physical universes that follow patterns? Why are there tiny cells with amazing functions? Believing all this happened at random takes faith. Believing all this is knitted together by God takes faith. At least the later has the Bible as evidence and the places and events of the Bible are traced.
It does not take any faith whatsoever.
All of the physics things are explained by the big bang. If evidence is found of a better explanation, we'll switch to that one.
All of those biological things are explained by evolution, with the exception of abiogenesis, and there is mountains of evidence explaining how that might have happened.
Asking how it "happened" implies there was a before it happened. There is no evidence of that, and no reason to think there was. It's quite likely time began with the big bang so there was nothing for it to come from.
None of this is simple, but it is all easy to believe once you understand.
You know what is hard to believe? A magic man in the sky who existed forever outside of time but then decided to create time and everything in it on a nearly infinite scale but place his personal fishtank on the third stone from a sun in the corner of one of billions of galaxies. And he stays hidden except for a short while to a bunch of illiterate shepherds 2 millennia before mass media. And he allowed thousands of similar stories of gods to exist but those are all false and just his is true.
That is the definition of preposterous.
Anonymous wrote:^atom, not stoneAnonymous wrote:Why is there perfect physics down to the stone and then subatomic particles? Why are their physical universes that follow patterns? Why are there tiny cells with amazing functions? Believing all this happened at random takes faith. Believing all this is knitted together by God takes faith. At least the later has the Bible as evidence and the places and events of the Bible are traced.