Anonymous wrote:I'm so scared I'm avoiding large crowd gatherings and not flying anywhere. We could be in for another 911. The past four years they let millions of people in the country without vetting them. I'm thinking the bad people are already here and waiting for the right place and right time.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so scared I'm avoiding large crowd gatherings and not flying anywhere. We could be in for another 911. The past four years they let millions of people in the country without vetting them. I'm thinking the bad people are already here and waiting for the right place and right time.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so scared I'm avoiding large crowd gatherings and not flying anywhere. We could be in for another 911. The past four years they let millions of people in the country without vetting them. I'm thinking the bad people are already here and waiting for the right place and right time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When US attacks a foreign country, it's "liberation".
When a foreign country fights back, it "terrorism".
Cute but sloppy.
1. Terrorism by definition involves non-state actors (though a state can sponsor or support terrorism).
2. Terrorism also typically involves the deliberate targeting of non-military targets for the purpose of generating…terror.
3. If a state deliberately attacks civilians, that is a war crime, not terrorism.
Iran sponsors terrorists. Israel has committed war crimes.
The US is an aggressor, but we’ve not seen any evidence so far that it has either sponsored terror or committed war crimes (unless you believe that it intentionally targeted the school).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Were probably going to be in for decades of terrorism after this administration.
This. Trump and Vance stupidly cut State Department experts, USAID, and the agents monitoring Iranian threats, and installed a 22yo grocery store clerk as our primary anti-terrorism expert right before they started a massive ME war.
Dumb and dumber. IDK why the military aren’t leaving, especially as the drunkard doesn’t want them acknowledged in newspapers in the eve t they die for our country. Yes, they put us at risk, but they’re putting soldiers at an even graver risk with their incompetence and cruelty.
Anonymous wrote:
Not to worry! We have a 22 year old zero experience at the helm.
https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-dhs-thomas-fugate-cp3-terrorism-prevention
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m mostly concerned because the democrats refuse to fully fund Homeland Security. Really stupid.
We're safer without them. They shoot Americans. Why are you afraid of a terrorist attack but not that?
Really?
TSA? Coast Guard? Secret Service?
Those are the people working without pay because of the democrats.
They're working without pay because the American people's outrage about ICE has reached a tipping point, giving Democrats a negotiating position they didn't have before. Maybe Republicans should try negotiating with them.
We don’t negotiate with terrorists. Or people behaving like children throwing a temper tantrum.
Meanwhile, travelers have the democrats to thank for this:
Multiple security issues today with a couple of airports stopping flights. It has nothing to do with Congress. It has to do with a war this addle minded poopy smelling Taco -loving dog started.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When US attacks a foreign country, it's "liberation".
When a foreign country fights back, it "terrorism".
Cute but sloppy.
1. Terrorism by definition involves non-state actors (though a state can sponsor or support terrorism).
2. Terrorism also typically involves the deliberate targeting of non-military targets for the purpose of generating…terror.
3. If a state deliberately attacks civilians, that is a war crime, not terrorism.
Iran sponsors terrorists. Israel has committed war crimes.
The US is an aggressor, but we’ve not seen any evidence so far that it has either sponsored terror or committed war crimes (unless you believe that it intentionally targeted the school).