Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP- what do you mean by “classic” books? Do you mean books written by white authors about white society only?
Yep. These classic books, meaning old, from another time, all have the same viewpoint, are all about living in a white community. This past century saw novels written by more of a variety of authors that deserve recognition.
In middle school they usually read one Steinbeck. No need to read another. Limit English authors to one Dickens or someone similar. Let Shakespeare go except a short study of his works. There are plenty of quality current novels with the same themes.
Shakespeare is unreadable for most. I know posters here see their kids as brilliant but the language used makes the reading unpleasant and so difficult that you can’t enjoy it. Some people say the themes of his plays are timeless, about love, jealousy, death, ambition, power, fate, freedom. These themes are done better in dozens of contemporary novels that are readable.
Time to move on to better quality, relevant novels for today’s society.
What is wrong with reading about white society? If someone says they don’t want to read about black society that isn’t ok but it is ok to say you don’t want to read about white society?
I don't think anyone is saying that. What they're saying is that by reading only the classics, you're almost exclusively reading about white society, and missing out on all others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP- what do you mean by “classic” books? Do you mean books written by white authors about white society only?
Yep. These classic books, meaning old, from another time, all have the same viewpoint, are all about living in a white community. This past century saw novels written by more of a variety of authors that deserve recognition.
In middle school they usually read one Steinbeck. No need to read another. Limit English authors to one Dickens or someone similar. Let Shakespeare go except a short study of his works. There are plenty of quality current novels with the same themes.
Shakespeare is unreadable for most. I know posters here see their kids as brilliant but the language used makes the reading unpleasant and so difficult that you can’t enjoy it. Some people say the themes of his plays are timeless, about love, jealousy, death, ambition, power, fate, freedom. These themes are done better in dozens of contemporary novels that are readable.
Time to move on to better quality, relevant novels for today’s society.
What is wrong with reading about white society? If someone says they don’t want to read about black society that isn’t ok but it is ok to say you don’t want to read about white society?
Anonymous wrote:War is war. The graphic stories of any war are describing someone's lived experience.
Those stories are not talking about the history behind the war. The history of any war belongs in history class not literature class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My freshman has read animal farm, romeo and juliet and now jurassic park. Hates them all.
Is this a joke? A typo?
+1, I laughed out loud when I saw Jurassic Park on PP's list. It's a fun read for sure, though, but to study it in school?![]()
Why not? This is the description of the book …
Jurassic Park is a 1990 science fiction novel by Michael Crichton about a theme park on a remote island where genetically engineered dinosaurs are brought to life, which ultimately fails due to scientific hubris and chaos theory, leading to a fight for survival. The book, a bestseller that blends science fiction with action-adventure, explores themes of genetic engineering, the dangers of unchecked science, and the unpredictability of complex systems.
Genetic engineering and unchecked science if relevant right now. Reading more than one Shakespeare is wasting valuable time that could be used reading more current novels that actually mean something.