Anonymous wrote:time for all schools to go test required. until vandy starts admitting undergrads (the nyc location is only a temp travel summer program for existing undergrads), these conclusions are meaningless

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vandy for example has 3% of students under a 3.5 GPA even with DI recruited athletes vs Emory's 35% under a 3.5 GPA with D3 athletes.

This despite oxford stats gaming by emory (lolz) to try and make your students look better at the main campus.

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/_includes/documents/sections/institutional-data/emory-common-data-set-2024-2025.pdf

Emory has a very weird resident hater. Emory cds says only 2.97% have less than a 3.5. So I dont know why you are lying? It also says the avg is a 3.84 and that 96% submitted gpa. It says 80% are in the top 10%, but is a meaningless stat as ONLY 5% submitted a class rank. Seems you care about things the industry doesn't care about. Lastly more students submit test scores at Emory than Vanderbilt.

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html

35% below a 3.5 on a 4.0 scale. 23% submitted class rank.

The graph says 2.33% for GPA 3.25-3.49 and 0.36% for 3.0-3.24. So 2.69% combined. Aligned woth the CDS. The chart under the graph seemes to indicate something else. Also, the link posted says 252 students submit class rank thus is 17.5%, which is not a representative sample. Please leave Emory alone. They should honestly doxx you, and get a restraining order against you.

what does that even mean? you want someone to get restrained online? did you major in reading at emory?

leave emory alone. how about you stop hyping up a trash school

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?

It’s somewhat higher than several other top 20 schools that admit a significant number of their students test optional

An important difference is that Vanderbilt has D1 sports and the other others do not

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?

It’s somewhat higher than several other top 20 schools that admit a significant number of their students test optional

An important difference is that Vanderbilt has D1 sports and the other others do not

You think 40 percent of the class are athletic recruits? Oh my.

No, but the difference between the several top 20 schools that remained test optional for the entering class of 2025 (Columbia, Penn, Duke, Chicago, Cornell, Harvard, Yale, WashU ++) can be partially explained by the number of athletes in the incoming class. Which is higher in D1 schools with football teams.

For the record, I wish that all the schools were test required. I don’t understand why only one test optional school gets all the hate though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?

It’s somewhat higher than several other top 20 schools that admit a significant number of their students test optional

An important difference is that Vanderbilt has D1 sports and the other others do not

You think 40 percent of the class are athletic recruits? Oh my.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?

It’s somewhat higher than several other top 20 schools that admit a significant number of their students test optional

An important difference is that Vanderbilt has D1 sports and the other others do not

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vandy for example has 3% of students under a 3.5 GPA even with DI recruited athletes vs Emory's 35% under a 3.5 GPA with D3 athletes.

This despite oxford stats gaming by emory (lolz) to try and make your students look better at the main campus.

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/_includes/documents/sections/institutional-data/emory-common-data-set-2024-2025.pdf

Emory has a very weird resident hater. Emory cds says only 2.97% have less than a 3.5. So I dont know why you are lying? It also says the avg is a 3.84 and that 96% submitted gpa. It says 80% are in the top 10%, but is a meaningless stat as ONLY 5% submitted a class rank. Seems you care about things the industry doesn't care about. Lastly more students submit test scores at Emory than Vanderbilt.

https://provost.emory.edu/planning-administration/data/factbook/admissions.html

35% below a 3.5 on a 4.0 scale. 23% submitted class rank.

The graph says 2.33% for GPA 3.25-3.49 and 0.36% for 3.0-3.24. So 2.69% combined. Aligned woth the CDS. The chart under the graph seemes to indicate something else. Also, the link posted says 252 students submit class rank thus is 17.5%, which is not a representative sample. Please leave Emory alone. They should honestly doxx you, and get a restraining order against you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?

It’s somewhat higher than several other top 20 schools that admit a significant number of their students test optional

An important difference is that Vanderbilt has D1 sports and the other others do not

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of the people complaining about Northeastern and Vanderbilt -- "brand dilution," "embarrassing" -- had those schools on their radar 25 or 35 years ago?

It may work, it may not. But their brand isnt strong enough for this. They'll end up hiding the stats of these locations.

They’re not for incoming freshman, so your envy-laced use of the word “hiding” doesn’t work

Dp, but that's actually funny when talking about a school that accepts half the class test optional.

.

61% of admitted students submitted scores

Do you think that sounds good?