Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.
Everyone who doesn't want kids is better off single, especially if they are dating someone messy, disorganized, and a low earner. Date them until it's not enjoyable anymore, and then walk away with a clean break. This applies to men and women.
Keep waking away from one BF to another BF until retirement?
Isn't that what dating culture is teaching us to keep on waiting, and waiting and discard people who doesn't even align with you in a slight way, Sad but true!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.
Everyone who doesn't want kids is better off single, especially if they are dating someone messy, disorganized, and a low earner. Date them until it's not enjoyable anymore, and then walk away with a clean break. This applies to men and women.
Keep waking away from one BF to another BF until retirement?
Anonymous wrote:Instead of working on becoming a good partner and committing to build a solid and healthy marriage, they want the unicorn partner who'll do it all for both people.
They see healthy compromise as them becoming submissive and normal conflicts as potential explosions. Finding an easy way out of not committing or ending a relationship instead of working on it becomes an instinctive choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We really need to rethink how we use the term “broken family”. Just because a marriage ends in divorce doesn’t mean a family is broken. Divorce can be a healthy solution to a problem. There are so many married people who overlook child abuse, infidelity, physical abuse, and other terrible things to stay married. They are married but a broken family. If someone leaves such a dynamic they do so because they are healthy, and are setting a good example for any children involved.
While many marriages are hell but in general glorifying divorcees doesn't erase their mess or children's suffering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Children of divorce and drama tend to be reluctant of committing to any partner, not because of who their partner is but who they are.
Fair, there is an OP issue here, too, and in this case, OP's list of "cons" are solid marriage disqualifiers, or at least they should be (Cons: diagnosed adhd, messy, stubborn/inflexible, dysfunctional family (but not local). He’s in low earning profession ...)
Anonymous wrote:Children of divorce and drama tend to be reluctant of committing to any partner, not because of who their partner is but who they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.
Everyone who doesn't want kids is better off single, especially if they are dating someone messy, disorganized, and a low earner. Date them until it's not enjoyable anymore, and then walk away with a clean break. This applies to men and women.
Keep waking away from one BF to another BF until retirement?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.
Everyone who doesn't want kids is better off single, especially if they are dating someone messy, disorganized, and a low earner. Date them until it's not enjoyable anymore, and then walk away with a clean break. This applies to men and women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. Some things about me:
Pros: solid career with good earnings, physically 7.5-8, good sense of humor, good at planning things, smart, own home, go to therapy when I need to
Cons: don’t want kids (this narrows my pool), I’m sometimes overly sensitive, I am not submissive, my family members are a mixed bag
I'm going to say no .
Not because of him but because of you. You don't seem capable of an accurate self assessment yet are very critical of him. Which leads me to believe he's not as inflexible as you claim.
He did start meds which is a huge thing. So I'm inclined to believe that what you call inflexibility is just him not wanting to be molded into your perfect man.
100%. OP doesn't seem to want a commitment, responsibility of a husband or kids. Just needs someone for sex, wooing, paying bills, cleaning, cooking, buying gifts, taking on trips etc so basically a yes man who earns well and lives far away from his birth family but can cater to OP and her mixed bag broken family. He isn't allowed to have any flaws or needs.
Marriage is a partnership in which both parties merge their weaknesses and strengths and work together to build a better future for the family. If you can't commit to that, both of you are better off finding people who can make such commitment.
Yesterday's women were better off single but today's men are better off single.