Anonymous wrote:The only two early admits from our small, private high school were athletes who got full "athletic tips" from coaches at Princeton. Otherwise, they were students who took a fair amount of rigor and were known to be strong, but not top students. One of the early admits is the BFF of my DS's girlfriend so she shared her GPA was around 3.8 unweighted and her SAT was around 1480, just to give you a sense of how much the coach tip really improves your chances!
So for those who didn't get in, please don't feel bad. If you had a shot at Princeton, you'll land at another amazing school for sure. Princeton's loss will be your DC's college's gain!
Anonymous wrote:It’s also worth noting that full-pay students are the ones effectively funding this support. I fully agree with helping low-SES students, but it feels unfair that full-pay families end up subsidizing people who only pretend to be poor.
And then there are kids on Reddit asking, “My parents didn’t go to college in the U.S.—am I first-gen?”
Seriously
Anonymous wrote:[img]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, the only admits on Reddit are test optional kids from small towns. And a ton of rejections from the rest of the US with 1590+.
no dog in this fight but it's striking.
We had an admit from our private, already posted, in Maryland and not a legacy.
Lacrosse admit
No a theatre kid actually. No hooks.
Oh interesting. there is another Maryland private admit who is lacrosse.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, the only admits on Reddit are test optional kids from small towns. And a ton of rejections from the rest of the US with 1590+.
no dog in this fight but it's striking.
We had an admit from our private, already posted, in Maryland and not a legacy.
Lacrosse admit
No a theatre kid actually. No hooks.
Anonymous wrote:If SCEA is so bad for a certain profile of kid (non hook), why do all the high school counselors seem to still insist the odds are better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2 so far from Whitman
Legacies/recruited athlete?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, the only admits on Reddit are test optional kids from small towns. And a ton of rejections from the rest of the US with 1590+.
no dog in this fight but it's striking.
We had an admit from our private, already posted, in Maryland and not a legacy.
+1. Two from DC private (not Sidwell/NCS/STA)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1580, all As, 4.94 weighted, all 5's, highest rigor, rejected
How does a kid with this of rigor and stats not make it… unreal.
Poor kid.
Lots of reasons.
Major? Does he/she look like everyone else? What's different? What stands out? It can't be grades or scores. So, what else?
Not poor or URM. So much for the SC ruling in 2024.
“Poor” or rural is neutrally applied (not race biased). Perfectly legal
I think that can be argued depending on the majority of the race of the poor. If it is a large swath of lowering performing URMs- it will go to court. If it is more poor whites- likely not.
Thank you, Clarence Darrow.