Anonymous wrote:https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/nrma-spent-12-months-developing-safety-protocol-deep-dive-before-80yearolds-tragic-lizard-island-cruise-ship-death/news-story/0d42d32d3e05ab9d6eec7838d6162af0?s=09
So the company spent a year on excursion safety protocols for international trips. Not on domestic trips that serve a large share of their passengers.
What's shocking is Coral Expeditions flew the passengers back home before the ship was boarded by investigators. That stinks to high heaven. Wonder if they even told authorities they were doing it.
It doesn't stink.
1) passengers had no responsibility to a fellow guest.
2) The cruise apparently could not continue and authorities can delay you however long they want, meaning an uncertain guest environment for guests remaining on board. People really dislike being "held hostage" and not getting "what they paid for". I was on a cruise once where about 100 people's luggage never reached the ship. There was quite a lot of evident grumpiness with staff at the front desk, in the ship's gift shop, etc. Wealthy older men expect to do what they want.
3) Keeping passengers, who are likely going to get comped for their entire cruise, onboard longer would increase the expense to the company for feeding them, etc.
4) Given the situation, where people didn't even realize this lady was missing, there are few passengers who would have any useful testimony.
It's more reasonable if you look at it from the perspective of a company trying to appease hundreds of angry/disappointed people who are all in close proximity.