Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That wasn't my claim. You don't think it's well implemented at your school, but apparently there are enough families there that do. That trumps your minority view.
The status quo works for the in crowd so just be quiet OP.
Anonymous wrote:That wasn't my claim. You don't think it's well implemented at your school, but apparently there are enough families there that do. That trumps your minority view.
Anonymous wrote:That wasn't my claim. You don't think it's well implemented at your school, but apparently there are enough families there that do. That trumps your minority view.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This person is clearly here just to antagonize. And it’s not the first thread they’ve started over the last number of months, where they set up an argument that no one agrees with, but insists that everyone else is wrong.
In fact, many people agree. The fact that you don’t agree doesn’t mean that the argument is invalid.
No, the fact that there's more than enough demand for schools operating under the current financial aid model means that the argument lacks sufficient support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This person is clearly here just to antagonize. And it’s not the first thread they’ve started over the last number of months, where they set up an argument that no one agrees with, but insists that everyone else is wrong.
In fact, many people agree. The fact that you don’t agree doesn’t mean that the argument is invalid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This person is clearly here just to antagonize. And it’s not the first thread they’ve started over the last number of months, where they set up an argument that no one agrees with, but insists that everyone else is wrong.
It’s so exhausting
Anonymous wrote:This person is clearly here just to antagonize. And it’s not the first thread they’ve started over the last number of months, where they set up an argument that no one agrees with, but insists that everyone else is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not real diversity to me. The school just trying to profit out of diversity trying to offer it as another amenity of the school.
My kids care about whether there are other classmates who look like them.
Anonymous wrote:This person is clearly here just to antagonize. And it’s not the first thread they’ve started over the last number of months, where they set up an argument that no one agrees with, but insists that everyone else is wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is racial diversity without socioeconomic diversity so abhorrent to you? It has value to some people.
NP, I think racial diversity is good, it’s just that can be achieved with families paying full tuition. No need to use that money for financial aid for diverse upper middle class families.
So you just want your kids to be with rich people. That’s basically what the rest of us have always thought. It’s good to hear you say it.
Anonymous wrote:Why is the inherent assumption that a diverse class is for optics only? The class in the photo that I referenced above doesn’t just look diverse, it is diverse. There are super wealthy kids, kids that come from far away every day, kids for whom English is a second language and many other flavors.
That a school is racially diverse does not mean that it’s purely for the purpose of boasting about it. Some people actually seek an eduction where kids are surrounded by people who don’t all look, think, spend and live like they do.