Anonymous wrote:Miller is a total wimp! Chalk message from a female Boomer is a threat to his life? What a total drama queen!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And apparently Trump is afraid of him, which is why Trump is not reining in ICE despite how angry the public seems to be about their tactics.
The angry people are liberals who hate everything he does.
Correct. We are VERY angry, and you’ll be regretting it for years to come.
Well, we were very angry about what Biden was doing on immigration, and liberals seem to be regretting it when all of their open borders policies were reversed. Thank God for Trump and ICE for restoring law and order to this country!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His wife that has picked up his speaking style and general evil esthetic threatens to lookinto the citizenship applications of individuals that offend her. I wonder how their kids will turn out?
You are giving the witch too much credit. She was probably already evil.
Anonymous wrote:His wife that has picked up his speaking style and general evil esthetic threatens to lookinto the citizenship applications of individuals that offend her. I wonder how their kids will turn out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is nuts:
https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-miller-2674261914/uGvsfgM3Q
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and his wife, Katie, felt so threatened by 65-year-old liberal activist Barbara Wien that they had her phone confiscated by Virginia State Police in August, The New York Times reported.
Anyone able to share a non paywall link to the NYT article?
Ask and you shall receive:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/us/politics/stephen-miller-activist-battle-free-speech.html?unlocked_article_code=1.yk8.v_5i.d5nlb00Eh6R3&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
Anonymous wrote:This is nuts:
https://www.rawstory.com/stephen-miller-2674261914/uGvsfgM3Q
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, and his wife, Katie, felt so threatened by 65-year-old liberal activist Barbara Wien that they had her phone confiscated by Virginia State Police in August, The New York Times reported.
Anyone able to share a non paywall link to the NYT article?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.threads.com/@myname.isneo/post/DPfWj8hkoQB?xmt=AQF01js-iV40Sj1EGM6Zc6AEQ7XzdOcKcDoPMRR3wDSk-A&slof=1
This video is incredibly alarming. For those who won’t bother clicking, he said “The president has plenary authority,” and then he completely froze up. No, he didn’t stroke out. He said a term that is said so much in his daily conversations that he forgot not to say it on national tv. Someone in his ear told him to stop talking, and he realized what he had done. Maga, how do you defend this? How does this not scare the crap out of you?
Key characteristics of plenary authority
Completeness: The authority is total and lacks restrictions within its defined area.
Absolute: It is not qualified by external limitations or dependent on others' consent.
Unrestricted: The power is broad and all-encompassing for its designated purpose.
Derived from the Latin term plenus: This means the power is "full" and "complete".
Why is this so alarming to you? It's literally the first sentence of the Executive Branch in the Constitution. Has been since 1790.
Article II. - THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
(AKA The Vesting Clause)
Article I is longer than one sentence. You've got to keep reading to know what powers Article II has and does not have.
The president is the boss of the entire executive branch. That's a fact.
You did not read the full article ii
Oh, but I did.
He also doesn't have the power to forgive student debt just because he wants to.
That's a spending item, so it requires the legislative branch to enact that spending (and charge the tax payers for the debt).
And the Biden admin correctly deferred and adjusted course after the supreme court rules against them, i.e.faithful execution of law. You may google this for fact checking.
Why did they try in the first place?
It's a very clear rule.
Why did Trump? The birthright executive order for starters.
Because it is not clearly established....
U.S. Constitution - “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.threads.com/@myname.isneo/post/DPfWj8hkoQB?xmt=AQF01js-iV40Sj1EGM6Zc6AEQ7XzdOcKcDoPMRR3wDSk-A&slof=1
This video is incredibly alarming. For those who won’t bother clicking, he said “The president has plenary authority,” and then he completely froze up. No, he didn’t stroke out. He said a term that is said so much in his daily conversations that he forgot not to say it on national tv. Someone in his ear told him to stop talking, and he realized what he had done. Maga, how do you defend this? How does this not scare the crap out of you?
Key characteristics of plenary authority
Completeness: The authority is total and lacks restrictions within its defined area.
Absolute: It is not qualified by external limitations or dependent on others' consent.
Unrestricted: The power is broad and all-encompassing for its designated purpose.
Derived from the Latin term plenus: This means the power is "full" and "complete".
Why is this so alarming to you? It's literally the first sentence of the Executive Branch in the Constitution. Has been since 1790.
Article II. - THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
(AKA The Vesting Clause)
Article I is longer than one sentence. You've got to keep reading to know what powers Article II has and does not have.
The president is the boss of the entire executive branch. That's a fact.
You did not read the full article ii
Oh, but I did.
He also doesn't have the power to forgive student debt just because he wants to.
That's a spending item, so it requires the legislative branch to enact that spending (and charge the tax payers for the debt).
And the Biden admin correctly deferred and adjusted course after the supreme court rules against them, i.e.faithful execution of law. You may google this for fact checking.
Why did they try in the first place?
It's a very clear rule.
Why did Trump? The birthright executive order for starters.
Because it is not clearly established....
U.S. Constitution - “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof”