Anonymous wrote:This just looks like a list of well known, reputable schools kids attend from our local APS high school after shooting their shot ag a bunch of the highest ranked schools and not getting in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here are horrible. I'm a Harvard grad, my husband is U Penn. While my son is a great kid, he is not going to make either of those schools - he's a likely or target at somewhere like UIUC, which is discussed in the book and would be a potential good fit for him. Does that mean he's worthless as a person, by DCUM?
Maybe you should check the mirror.
NP here. I understand why PP listed his/her schools. Otherwise, how many seconds would have taken someone to post “You’re just bitter because you didn’t get in.” ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here are horrible. I'm a Harvard grad, my husband is U Penn. While my son is a great kid, he is not going to make either of those schools - he's a likely or target at somewhere like UIUC, which is discussed in the book and would be a potential good fit for him. Does that mean he's worthless as a person, by DCUM?
Maybe you should check the mirror.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "hidden value" list is a list of schools I would not spend my money on. If those are my kids options, in-state it is.
Isn't the assumption that those would be nearly free due to merit? Otherwise, I 100% agree with you.
I suspect that they get down to State costs with merit, not nearly free. There are schools on that list that are far better than most state schools.
Such as? I would choose one of our excellent state schools any day over that random list of "hidden value" schools.
DP
I agree.
Yep, economy is going to hell. Not the time to take a chance on a flailing private. This list is a decade too late.
Some of these schools have big endowments. Depauw has an endowment of almost a billion. Denison's is a little over a billion. Berry has an endowment of 1.2 Billion. Santa Clara has a 1.55 billion dollar endowment. Trinity has an endowment of 1.84 billion. Furman has an 828 million dollar endowment.
Anonymous wrote:It’s easy to take pot shots at the “hidden values” section of list. I don’t see anyone claiming they’d never in a million years allow their child to apply to UMCP, VT, or W&M, all of which are also on the complete Selingo list.
Anonymous wrote:I read the book. It's an easy read.
I dont think all his anecdotes are as compelling as he did. Did someone already mention the girl who chose SMU (over what .. some other more prestigious school, but can't remember), also didn't like SMU. Like the Columbia kid. She just didn't leave after freshman year.
I can't really imagine picking Mississippi over Rice, especially considering Rice was giving that student a ton of money.
I do get MN! That's a great flagship.
(I am also considering some political stuff to be fair, I wouldn't want my kids in Mississippi really)
And the info about how to look at schools is stuff I knew, but I also realize I'm a super consumer of this info, which is why I read this book first week out.
The story about the MIT AO was news. I googled more of that and honestly it sounds more traumatic than Selingo even described (which makes sense). A nightmare
Anonymous wrote:People here are horrible. I'm a Harvard grad, my husband is U Penn. While my son is a great kid, he is not going to make either of those schools - he's a likely or target at somewhere like UIUC, which is discussed in the book and would be a potential good fit for him. Does that mean he's worthless as a person, by DCUM?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just read the list. Completely random. Save your money. Don't buy.
you can read the book for free at the library. on kindle, it only cost me $15. I just finished it and definitely got more than $15 worth of advice and insight. the list is just in the appendix and it includes a longer commentary on each selected school. but the book is really not about the dream school list alone.
+100.
What's sending me about this thread is all the people commenting on just the list who have not read the actual book. I guess this is what I should have expected because this crowd is not known for context or nuance. I wish he had never included the list in the appendix - it distracts from the broader message. The real value is not in the list but in the insights and tools he provides to help families make informed decisions. People seem to be missing the forest for the trees here.