Anonymous wrote:I complained to someone in DCPS central office about this, and it was a disappointing conversation. The person I spoke to said the curriculum was chosen to lighten the planning lift for teachers and so that more students could relate to the content. They also said there would be more focus on writing, rather than reading, and they confirmed that there was no consultation of parents during the decision-making process.
Anonymous wrote:I complained to someone in DCPS central office about this, and it was a disappointing conversation. The person I spoke to said the curriculum was chosen to lighten the planning lift for teachers and so that more students could relate to the content. They also said there would be more focus on writing, rather than reading, and they confirmed that there was no consultation of parents during the decision-making process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not every school is following this. I work at Stuart-Hobson and our ELA curriculum is unchanged, with a writing focus across all content areas.
It's piloted. This will be your curriculum in 2 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like some deal teachers are trying to get students to read actual books by giving them a list of books, sati ng pick one, read 30 minutes every night at home, and do a one paragraph book report on it. One book each term so we are back to 4-5 books.
But basically this is just making parents enforce independent reading. My reluctant reader won't do this this without a wwIII battle - she will bluff her way through using the graphic novels on the list or reading the blurb and writing from that. She doesn't do ai yet or look up book summaries, but she'll figure that out pretty quick. If it was assigned at school she'd read it.
I don’t understand, why would she read the book if it was assigned, instead of using AI or looking up book summaries? It’s not magic. The only way to confirm that kids are actually reading assigned material is to use classroom time for the reading. And classroom time is limited. So that’s a strong argument in favor of the shorter texts used in the new curriculum.
If you want your reluctant kid to actually read books at home you are going to have to be the enforcer. Or I guess you could pay someone else to watch them read. There’s nothing a teacher or curriculum can do about what happens in your home.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like some deal teachers are trying to get students to read actual books by giving them a list of books, sati ng pick one, read 30 minutes every night at home, and do a one paragraph book report on it. One book each term so we are back to 4-5 books.
But basically this is just making parents enforce independent reading. My reluctant reader won't do this this without a wwIII battle - she will bluff her way through using the graphic novels on the list or reading the blurb and writing from that. She doesn't do ai yet or look up book summaries, but she'll figure that out pretty quick. If it was assigned at school she'd read it.
Anonymous wrote:Not every school is following this. I work at Stuart-Hobson and our ELA curriculum is unchanged, with a writing focus across all content areas.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a DCPS MS teacher and it’s not just ELA. Social studies and world languages also have no real curriculum. Zero writing instruction. At my school, I’m not even allowed to do any direct instruction. Everything has to be “inquiry.”
Central office won’t listen to teachers, but they might listen to parents if yall complain.