Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS now suing DOE for release of Federal funds - https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/08/29/breaking-fcps-sues-education-department-for-freezing-funding-over-transgender-policies/ . FCPS should have to itemize legal spending in their budget.

It's so cute that they still think laws exist

They have a good legal case based on precedent but the hack Supreme Court will back whatever the dictator says.

This "hack" supreme Court is the only thing providing any limits on this administration. They're unelected, there's a limit to what they should be able to do.

Try winning some elections instead of just shrieking at everyone all the time.

Anyone who voted for Trump is brain dead

And anti American

You knew he was never going to leave office you knew he’d turn out like Putin you knew he’d hand national secrets over and you dam well know he’s in the Epstein files

No6 only are you anti American garbage you are happy to support child abuse

I didn't vote for Trump

We live in a democracy. Try winning an election sometime.

Trump is horrible but he's not Putin.
What national secrets has he's handed over?
I haven't seen the Epstein files but I could believe he is in there. So are a lot of people is my guess. Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, a lot of people. But we don't have proof.

Trump won the popular vote. You are saying that there are more imaginative voters than American voters?

Just sit down and shut up until you can win am election. Let the adults try to fix this mess you have created.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

PP here. That’s opinion.
So are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?

Please show me where Title IX addresses "gender identity."

Does the 4th Circuit’s decision currently stand?

That was not the question. Does Title IX address gender identity in its language?

It definitely was the question. Go back to 11:50. A PP said what they think the SCOTUS “needs to” do. The question unanswered was, “…are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

PP here. That’s opinion.
So are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?

Please show me where Title IX addresses "gender identity."

Does the 4th Circuit’s decision currently stand?

That was not the question. Does Title IX address gender identity in its language?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

PP here. That’s opinion.
So are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?

Please show me where Title IX addresses "gender identity."

Does the 4th Circuit’s decision currently stand?

Anonymous wrote:There is the assumption here that segregating bathrooms by gender identity will reduce bullying as trans-gendered women won't be bullied in the men's bathroom.

What about trans-gendered men? Is there any reason to believe they will be less bullied by the same men that bully trans-gendered women? In an environment where bathrooms are segregated by gender identity, will trans-gendered men be forced to use the men's bathroom?

I think the problem is that the policy can be abused by "fakes" meaning men using the "transgender" label to get into women's spaces. We had an example recently here in the area.

And, I still do not know what the rules are in school. Some kids are "gender fluid." What are the policies there?

There is the assumption here that segregating bathrooms by gender identity will reduce bullying as trans-gendered women won't be bullied in the men's bathroom.

What about trans-gendered men? Is there any reason to believe they will be less bullied by the same men that bully trans-gendered women? In an environment where bathrooms are segregated by gender identity, will trans-gendered men be forced to use the men's bathroom?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

PP here. That’s opinion.
So are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?

Please show me where Title IX addresses "gender identity."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

PP here. That’s opinion.
So are you admitting that current FCPS policy meets current law?

Anonymous wrote:I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

The Supreme Court really needs to step in and put and end to the judicial activism by the Circuit Courts.

I consider myself a Democrat, although we don’t register by political party. I don’t think boys should be on girls’ sports teams, but I know that FCPS should adhere to the law and right now they seem to be adhering to that which was determined by the 4th Circuit court.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS now suing DOE for release of Federal funds - https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/08/29/breaking-fcps-sues-education-department-for-freezing-funding-over-transgender-policies/ . FCPS should have to itemize legal spending in their budget.

It's so cute that they still think laws exist

The point you’re making is sad. What are they supposed to do? If they bow to current Dept of Education demands they are will be in violation of the last court determination of the law. Law should matter.

I agree it should. But so many unlawful things are happening unchecked right now.

Agreed. The cruelty is the point, it’s not about the law at all. It’s trans kids now. Who is next?

What you see as cruelty is the removal of privilege.

what? Trump criticized a trans athlete in California. Of course that’s going to cause this child to be the target of hatred and bullying. You think that’s Ok? There can be differences in opinion and you can have a debate about policy. But if you think something like this is acceptable, where the POTUS attacks a . minor, is that the kind of world do you want your child to grow up in?

As with everything republicans do, they don’t care about anything bad happening until it happens to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS now suing DOE for release of Federal funds - https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/08/29/breaking-fcps-sues-education-department-for-freezing-funding-over-transgender-policies/ . FCPS should have to itemize legal spending in their budget.

It's so cute that they still think laws exist

The point you’re making is sad. What are they supposed to do? If they bow to current Dept of Education demands they are will be in violation of the last court determination of the law. Law should matter.

I agree it should. But so many unlawful things are happening unchecked right now.

Agreed. The cruelty is the point, it’s not about the law at all. It’s trans kids now. Who is next?

What you see as cruelty is the removal of privilege.

what? Trump criticized a trans athlete in California. Of course that’s going to cause this child to be the target of hatred and bullying. You think that’s Ok? There can be differences in opinion and you can have a debate about policy. But if you think something like this is acceptable, where the POTUS attacks a . minor, is that the kind of world do you want your child to grow up in?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FCPS now suing DOE for release of Federal funds - https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/08/29/breaking-fcps-sues-education-department-for-freezing-funding-over-transgender-policies/ . FCPS should have to itemize legal spending in their budget.

It's so cute that they still think laws exist

The point you’re making is sad. What are they supposed to do? If they bow to current Dept of Education demands they are will be in violation of the last court determination of the law. Law should matter.

I agree it should. But so many unlawful things are happening unchecked right now.

Agree. It’s so sad to see so many Americans welcome dictatorship when we have a system that was formerly the pride of the world. Why do they hate America?

You could try winning an election sometime instead of calling everyone to the right if you a MAGAT until they finally believe you.

what a sad statement.

Anonymous wrote:Ds just refuse to protect girls/women, they can’t even define what a girl/woman is.

what??

Ds just refuse to protect girls/women, they can’t even define what a girl/woman is.