Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lot of legal scholars here lol
Only the looniest would think this is ok or defensible.
Has anyone here said that this is OK or defensible?
Are you joking? Have you even read this thread, starting on page 1??
DP
Any time an abortion happens, it is a good thing. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Wow. A new low for DCUM
You did not answer the question. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Who made you legal guardian of the kid?
Anonymous wrote:Welp, here we go again. The whistle blower sent the Centreville principal an email about the abortion years ago and called him out when he later denied any knowledge. The whistle blower recorded her conversation with FCPS investigators back in May, but they claimed they only became aware of the issue this week. If FCPS is going to lie, don't do it when they had to have known that the "reporter" had the evidence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This mess is bad enough as it stands, a serious crime is being alledged and the truth needs to come out. But the way the information is coming out is designed to influence the election, the two guys on Twitter who are making the reports are trickling out what they know while encouraging speculation. Instead of teasing that there is more to come they need to release what they have and let an honest investigation begin. Meanwhile Reid and FCPS appear to have gone into full cover up mode, which only plays into the hands of the bad actors.
It’s not the journalists’ (X guys) job to enforce the law. Their job is to uncover, report - and if needed be- denounce irregularities (cover-ups, etc.) after the investigation has concluded. In this case FCPS, the alleged lawbreaker, is investigating itself for this crime. Rest assured we’ll hear more about these journalists/X guys as needed.
This is no longer about Dems vs. GOP. It’s more about right from wrong.
My point was that the "reporters" appear to be timing the information release to try to harm FCPS and by extension Democrat candidates. The truth needs to be exposed, the guilty prosecuted, but I hate how this is playing out on both sides.
Different poster here
Well, if FCPS doesn’t like the timing of this information being released, they could always just be completely transparent and release all the information themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This mess is bad enough as it stands, a serious crime is being alledged and the truth needs to come out. But the way the information is coming out is designed to influence the election, the two guys on Twitter who are making the reports are trickling out what they know while encouraging speculation. Instead of teasing that there is more to come they need to release what they have and let an honest investigation begin. Meanwhile Reid and FCPS appear to have gone into full cover up mode, which only plays into the hands of the bad actors.
It’s not the journalists’ (X guys) job to enforce the law. Their job is to uncover, report - and if needed be- denounce irregularities (cover-ups, etc.) after the investigation has concluded. In this case FCPS, the alleged lawbreaker, is investigating itself for this crime. Rest assured we’ll hear more about these journalists/X guys as needed.
This is no longer about Dems vs. GOP. It’s more about right from wrong.
My point was that the "reporters" appear to be timing the information release to try to harm FCPS and by extension Democrat candidates. The truth needs to be exposed, the guilty prosecuted, but I hate how this is playing out on both sides.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lot of legal scholars here lol
Only the looniest would think this is ok or defensible.
Has anyone here said that this is OK or defensible?
Are you joking? Have you even read this thread, starting on page 1??
DP
Any time an abortion happens, it is a good thing. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Wow. A new low for DCUM
You did not answer the question. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Who made you legal guardian of the kid?
The law is the issue here. This is not a pro-life/choice issue.
I think there is an "out" in the law for bypassing parents. But, I would hope it would not be used unless there were real concerns of abuse. Nevertheless, the school should not do either. It should have referred it to CPS.
Which law supersedes parents as a legal guardian?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lot of legal scholars here lol
Only the looniest would think this is ok or defensible.
Has anyone here said that this is OK or defensible?
Are you joking? Have you even read this thread, starting on page 1??
DP
Any time an abortion happens, it is a good thing. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Wow. A new low for DCUM
You did not answer the question. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Who made you legal guardian of the kid?
The law is the issue here. This is not a pro-life/choice issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lot of legal scholars here lol
Only the looniest would think this is ok or defensible.
Has anyone here said that this is OK or defensible?
Are you joking? Have you even read this thread, starting on page 1??
DP
Any time an abortion happens, it is a good thing. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Wow. A new low for DCUM
You did not answer the question. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Who made you legal guardian of the kid?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lot of legal scholars here lol
Only the looniest would think this is ok or defensible.
Has anyone here said that this is OK or defensible?
Are you joking? Have you even read this thread, starting on page 1??
DP
Any time an abortion happens, it is a good thing. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Wow. A new low for DCUM
You did not answer the question. How is a 17 year old having a child good in any way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Abortion for minors is illegal in VA without parent involvement, unless the minor gets judicial bypass. So was there judicial bypass for the 17-year-old? I highly doubt that any abortion clinic is going to risk their continued existence by providing abortions to minors without proven parental consent. They’re plenty busy with legal procedures.
Lots of questions here.
This. I think folks need to slow their roll for a hot second because the story as reported does not make sense.
If they got a judicial bypass, it's still probably not the role of the teacher to do the driving/paying, but it makes the whole thing make more sense.
If the girl was actually 18, it's again an edge case in terms of teacher involvement, but not illegal.
Basically, it seems that one teacher got overly emotionally involved with students and saw it as her role to help them get a medical procedure that they wanted, and that they might have found it difficult to access otherwise. That's certainly suggests a lack of appropriate boundaries, but it's honestly pretty relatable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This mess is bad enough as it stands, a serious crime is being alledged and the truth needs to come out. But the way the information is coming out is designed to influence the election, the two guys on Twitter who are making the reports are trickling out what they know while encouraging speculation. Instead of teasing that there is more to come they need to release what they have and let an honest investigation begin. Meanwhile Reid and FCPS appear to have gone into full cover up mode, which only plays into the hands of the bad actors.
It’s not the journalists’ (X guys) job to enforce the law. Their job is to uncover, report - and if needed be- denounce irregularities (cover-ups, etc.) after the investigation has concluded. In this case FCPS, the alleged lawbreaker, is investigating itself for this crime. Rest assured we’ll hear more about these journalists/X guys as needed.
This is no longer about Dems vs. GOP. It’s more about right from wrong.
Anonymous wrote:This mess is bad enough as it stands, a serious crime is being alledged and the truth needs to come out. But the way the information is coming out is designed to influence the election, the two guys on Twitter who are making the reports are trickling out what they know while encouraging speculation. Instead of teasing that there is more to come they need to release what they have and let an honest investigation begin. Meanwhile Reid and FCPS appear to have gone into full cover up mode, which only plays into the hands of the bad actors.