Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

We capture land by war now?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Israeli settlers brutalized an American, beating him unconscious and blocking an ambulance from reaching him, according to the victim’s family. The young Palestinian-American was pronounced dead by the time he arrived at a hospital. Born in Florida and grew up in the town of Port Charlotte.

https://zeteo.com/p/breaking-israeli-settlers-kill-american

When in the US, the person is an American citizen. When in the West Bank, they are Palestinian. Dual citizenship comes with costs as well as benefits.

Hm. Did you share this same sentiment for the young Israeli American killed by Hamas. His parents spoke at the Democratic convention.

Yes. Dual citizenship is a crock.

Don’t claim to be an American when in your other country. News often fails to report someone is a dual US-something else citizen when something happens to that person in the other country. It is totally misleading. Those people want to have bet out of jail free cards when something goes sideways in the other country. It isn’t fair to American and it isn’t fair to the other country.

Anonymous wrote:Everyone should watch Daniella Weiss's interview with Pierce Morgan to get an insight into the genocidal, racist mindset of an Israeli settler.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Anonymous wrote:https://deadline.com/2025/07/cnn-correspondent-crew-attacked-israeli-settlers-west-bank-1236457587/

CNN Crew Attacked By Israeli Settlers In West Bank Amid Escalating Violence Against Journalists

Israelis don't like when journalists report on their war crimes, that's why they've assassinated more than 200.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

Anonymous wrote:For a whole people to go through what the German government put them through during World War 2 to then be the perpetrators of the same kind of action toward the Palestinian people is amazing.