Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.
I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.
Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.
The lower tax rate is funneling money into corporations and billionaires pockets, not saving anything for blue States or red States or addressing the disparity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.
Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?
Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.
Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.
The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).
Texas state and local officials might have looked outside and noticed the torrential rain in a watershed at risk of catastrophic flash floods. Do local government officials need satellites to tell them that it is raining and the river is rising? NWS issued flash flood warnings and watches beginning Thursday afternoon. The failure was at the state and local levels.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.
Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?
Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.
Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.
The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.
Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.
Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.
Awwwwwww, someone got triggered😆
Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.
I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.
Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.
Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?
Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.
Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.
The warnings were low level until last minute (or after the fact).
Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.
Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?
Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.
Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.
Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.
Awwwwwww, someone got triggered😆
Anonymous wrote:Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.
I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.
Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:20 young girls are currently missing. Maybe wait for. Resolution before politicizing it.
Eh, who am I kidding? You’re incapable of that. It’s what you do - because you hate 1/2 the country.
Honey, your Dear Leader LITERALLY SAID he hated Dems (at least half the country) on July Fourth. So kindly F all the way off with your condescending and hypocritical lectures.
Perhaps the blue states should reduce this deficit by supporting lower tax rates. They can still have higher rates in their state, which they do except for Washington and Massachusetts.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.
I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.
Fortunately, we’re still a federal republic, and we take care of the red states. They’re obviously hypocritical “takers” (and the biggest snowflakes out there) but they still need somebody to take care of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.
I guess we should just end the subsidies of blue states to red states and each go our own way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Climate change aside, the FORECAST was wrong and didn’t say there was going to be that much rain.
Guess who just “thinned the pack” at NOAA?
Even if you don’t believe in climate change, we need accurate weather reports. Trump changed that.
Not true, the forecast the day before absolutely said there was going to be rain AND flash flood warnings.
Anonymous wrote:Democrats would have people in red states pay more for energy, as happens now in blue states.