Anonymous wrote:OP it's not worth posting on this forum on this issue. It's just taken over by people telling you feds are lazy or whatever.
Any reasonable person with any familiarity with the system would agree that no one expected TW to become much more restrictive than it was pre-Covid. That's it.
Anonymous wrote:The party is over. The employees were not just as effective or more efficient. We had a good run at it for 5 years but now it’s over.Anonymous wrote:The fight against telework is like the fight against allowing women into the workplace in the first place. There were ups and downs, some industries worse than others, forward progress and occasional backward progress, but in the end, you can’t put the cat back into the bag. I’m not saying that full remote work for everyone whose job can support it is the future, but some level of remote work, probably a hybrid arrangement, is likely to become the norm over the next 5-10 years. Covid was a rapid accelerant on the change, and now there’s a bit of backlash to how rapid the change was, but over time it will normalize.
Unfortunately for those of us who work for the federal government, our dear leader and his cronies have realized that, although in a less obviously offensive way, turning back the clock of progress will force some people to quit, which is their ultimate goal. There’s no notion of fairness, efficiency, or cost-savings here — it’s purely a tactic to force people, particularly those who have already seen how they can be just as effective, more efficient, and happier with some level of telework (whether a few days a pay period or more), to quit.
Anonymous wrote:The party is over. The employees were not just as effective or more efficient. We had a good run at it for 5 years but now it’s over.Anonymous wrote:The fight against telework is like the fight against allowing women into the workplace in the first place. There were ups and downs, some industries worse than others, forward progress and occasional backward progress, but in the end, you can’t put the cat back into the bag. I’m not saying that full remote work for everyone whose job can support it is the future, but some level of remote work, probably a hybrid arrangement, is likely to become the norm over the next 5-10 years. Covid was a rapid accelerant on the change, and now there’s a bit of backlash to how rapid the change was, but over time it will normalize.
Unfortunately for those of us who work for the federal government, our dear leader and his cronies have realized that, although in a less obviously offensive way, turning back the clock of progress will force some people to quit, which is their ultimate goal. There’s no notion of fairness, efficiency, or cost-savings here — it’s purely a tactic to force people, particularly those who have already seen how they can be just as effective, more efficient, and happier with some level of telework (whether a few days a pay period or more), to quit.
The party is over. The employees were not just as effective or more efficient. We had a good run at it for 5 years but now it’s over.Anonymous wrote:The fight against telework is like the fight against allowing women into the workplace in the first place. There were ups and downs, some industries worse than others, forward progress and occasional backward progress, but in the end, you can’t put the cat back into the bag. I’m not saying that full remote work for everyone whose job can support it is the future, but some level of remote work, probably a hybrid arrangement, is likely to become the norm over the next 5-10 years. Covid was a rapid accelerant on the change, and now there’s a bit of backlash to how rapid the change was, but over time it will normalize.
Unfortunately for those of us who work for the federal government, our dear leader and his cronies have realized that, although in a less obviously offensive way, turning back the clock of progress will force some people to quit, which is their ultimate goal. There’s no notion of fairness, efficiency, or cost-savings here — it’s purely a tactic to force people, particularly those who have already seen how they can be just as effective, more efficient, and happier with some level of telework (whether a few days a pay period or more), to quit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who insist on terminating TW are usually old men, people without children, or those who never did much childrearing. This generation of parents actually wants to spend time with their kids, we want to be able to cook a home cook meal several times a week, and see them after work for more than an hour, we don't want to be shitty/absent parents. TW simply gives us two hours of our lives back (at least!), time we can dedicate to our families and not commuting.
We are the generation that deeply understands why birthrates are going down. A society that refuses to support parents is doomed, young people will look at us and say "hard pass".
I’m a teacher and can’t stay at home. I rather resent the notion that I’m a “shitty/absent parent” because of my job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who insist on terminating TW are usually old men, people without children, or those who never did much childrearing. This generation of parents actually wants to spend time with their kids, we want to be able to cook a home cook meal several times a week, and see them after work for more than an hour, we don't want to be shitty/absent parents.
In previous generations a lot of parents felt the same way and solved the problem with part time work or a stay at home parent.
Anonymous wrote:Those who insist on terminating TW are usually old men, people without children, or those who never did much childrearing. This generation of parents actually wants to spend time with their kids, we want to be able to cook a home cook meal several times a week, and see them after work for more than an hour, we don't want to be shitty/absent parents. TW simply gives us two hours of our lives back (at least!), time we can dedicate to our families and not commuting.
We are the generation that deeply understands why birthrates are going down. A society that refuses to support parents is doomed, young people will look at us and say "hard pass".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those who insist on terminating TW are usually old men, people without children, or those who never did much childrearing. This generation of parents actually wants to spend time with their kids, we want to be able to cook a home cook meal several times a week, and see them after work for more than an hour, we don't want to be shitty/absent parents.
In previous generations a lot of parents felt the same way and solved the problem with part time work or a stay at home parent.
Anonymous wrote:Those who insist on terminating TW are usually old men, people without children, or those who never did much childrearing. This generation of parents actually wants to spend time with their kids, we want to be able to cook a home cook meal several times a week, and see them after work for more than an hour, we don't want to be shitty/absent parents.