Anonymous wrote:It is superior to every ivy that isn’t Princeton. Williams has always been extremely elite
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.
On what planet? Not on Earth.
More prestigious than Cornell.
Equally prestigious as Dartmouth, Brown, Columbia, Penn (and other WASPs)
Less prestigious than HYP.
What’s so difficult?
I would agree with this.
Signed, Ivy grad
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.
On what planet? Not on Earth.
More prestigious than Cornell.
Equally prestigious as Dartmouth, Brown, Columbia, Penn (and other WASPs)
Less prestigious than HYP.
What’s so difficult?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol... Williams was NEVER on the level of a truly elite university, and the value/general lay prestige of LACs has only decreased over time.
And if we're comparing it with its peer group, Amherst seems to be more well-known.
Hard disagree. I am head of HR at a large financial institution, and every year we recruit at the SLACs’ + Women’s LACs’ campuses, in addition to the Ivies & MIT. In contrast, we never go to state flagship campuses or universities south of Philly. Which isn’t to say we don’t recruit undergraduates from there, it just isn’t a focus for my firm, so these kids have to be motivated and creative and figure out a way to come to us for interviews.
Separately, NYC is about to elect a 33-year old Bowdoin grad for mayor who is very smart (even though I am in disagreement with all of his proposals).
+1
WASP grad in the deep South. It really is geography/social bubble/profession specific. More Ivy/NESCAC grads in medicine/academia down here. Financial institutions favor Duke, Emory, GA Tech, UVA.
Anonymous wrote:The top 5 SLACS are very tough admits, with acceptance rates in the single digits. But if I remember correctly, Williams had the highest acceptance rate of the five this past cycle. Sorry, OP, but that does not suggest "clear number 1" separate from the others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.
On what planet? Not on Earth.
More prestigious than Cornell.
Equally prestigious as Dartmouth, Brown, Columbia, Penn (and other WASPs)
Less prestigious than HYP.
What’s so difficult?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.
On what planet? Not on Earth.
Anonymous wrote:Unpopular among billionaires and CEOs, meaning she was very good at her job. For the ordinary American she was the GOAT of keeping monopolistic behaviors in check.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What famous people have gone to Williams? I can think of a senator and a CNN anchor, and that’s about it. And neither of them are _that_ famous, all things considered.
Lina Khan - FTC chair, 2021-2025
She’s pretty unpopular and really doesn’t do much today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol... Williams was NEVER on the level of a truly elite university, and the value/general lay prestige of LACs has only decreased over time.
And if we're comparing it with its peer group, Amherst seems to be more well-known.
Hard disagree. I am head of HR at a large financial institution, and every year we recruit at the SLACs’ + Women’s LACs’ campuses, in addition to the Ivies & MIT. In contrast, we never go to state flagship campuses or universities south of Philly. Which isn’t to say we don’t recruit undergraduates from there, it just isn’t a focus for my firm, so these kids have to be motivated and creative and figure out a way to come to us for interviews.
Separately, NYC is about to elect a 33-year old Bowdoin grad for mayor who is very smart (even though I am in disagreement with all of his proposals).
+1
WASP grad in the deep South. It really is geography/social bubble/profession specific. More Ivy/NESCAC grads in medicine/academia down here. Financial institutions favor Duke, Emory, GA Tech, UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol... Williams was NEVER on the level of a truly elite university, and the value/general lay prestige of LACs has only decreased over time.
And if we're comparing it with its peer group, Amherst seems to be more well-known.
Hard disagree. I am head of HR at a large financial institution, and every year we recruit at the SLACs’ + Women’s LACs’ campuses, in addition to the Ivies & MIT. In contrast, we never go to state flagship campuses or universities south of Philly. Which isn’t to say we don’t recruit undergraduates from there, it just isn’t a focus for my firm, so these kids have to be motivated and creative and figure out a way to come to us for interviews.
Separately, NYC is about to elect a 33-year old Bowdoin grad for mayor who is very smart (even though I am in disagreement with all of his proposals).
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lol... Williams was NEVER on the level of a truly elite university, and the value/general lay prestige of LACs has only decreased over time.
And if we're comparing it with its peer group, Amherst seems to be more well-known.
Hard disagree. I am head of HR at a large financial institution, and every year we recruit at the SLACs’ + Women’s LACs’ campuses, in addition to the Ivies & MIT. In contrast, we never go to state flagship campuses or universities south of Philly. Which isn’t to say we don’t recruit undergraduates from there, it just isn’t a focus for my firm, so these kids have to be motivated and creative and figure out a way to come to us for interviews.
Separately, NYC is about to elect a 33-year old Bowdoin grad for mayor who is very smart (even though I am in disagreement with all of his proposals).
Anonymous wrote:Williams is the real deal. The only LAC with almost-ivy level prestige.