Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so tired of these posts. There is literally nothing we can do about this. It’s pointless to sit around worrying about things we can’t change or control.
said the white man
I am a white woman….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Afraid of what? I’m pro life. I’m not “scared” that abortion is now a state issue.
Pro-lifer is a misnomer because you actually are pro-death and killing mothers due to avoidable pregnancy complications.
Anonymous wrote:Afraid of what? I’m pro life. I’m not “scared” that abortion is now a state issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.
Unless your birth certificate matches your ID, you will not be able to vote. Did you take your husbands last name when you got married?
That’s just not true. If you can prove citizenship, you can vote. Birth certificate plus marriage certificate, Real ID, passport. Lots of options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.
Serious people stopped reading when you said you are a female trumpet.
You asked why women are not speaking up. You asked why Republican women are not speaking up and I answered you. We don’t see him as a threat to our rights.
Hiw can you not see??? Have you bothered to read Project 2025 and do you realize they are following this like a playbook? What about when you can’t vote because you have a married name don’t have a passport?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a female Trump voter. I’m not afraid at all. I don’t understand your point. I don’t see what rights he is taking away from us. Your claim about not being able to drive is preposterous, especially when states issue drivers licenses.
Unless your birth certificate matches your ID, you will not be able to vote. Did you take your husbands last name when you got married?
That’s just not true. If you can prove citizenship, you can vote. Birth certificate plus marriage certificate, Real ID, passport. Lots of options.
And you don't think this burden on women is straight up misogynist BS?
+1 Men don't have to jump through these hoops to exercise their right to vote.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they've realized that dedicating their 20's and 30's to soul sucking careers wasn't all they thought it would be. Many are old enough to see the game they were born into but not young enough to adapt to it. Millennials are coming of age and they aren't happy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.
So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.
Yeah, I am worried.
Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?
I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.
If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.
Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.
Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.
Nope he was the right choice in 2020. Hr should have announced he wasn’t seeking another term 18 months before the election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.
So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.
Yeah, I am worried.
Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?
I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.
If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.
Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.
Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.
Nope he was the right choice in 2020. Hr should have announced he wasn’t seeking another term 18 months before the election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas lets women die of sepsis due to the dead babies they are not allowed to have removed.
So, Texas is cool with killing women to prevent them from having dead people removed from their uterus.
Yeah, I am worried.
Why do I care if Texas decides not to accept a bunch of forms of ID and makes it harder to vote?
I posted on the other thread that stupid people should be allowed to vote. I don’t believe in disenfranchisement. I’m never going to say this is worthwhile, even if it garners more Dem votes. Dems are better than MAGA/GOP. Our policies are popular. We don’t need to screw people over to win.
If we could avoid being duped into nominating 80 year old clowns and instead nominate the Obama/Clinton types, we'd never lose to the pathetic Trump era GOP.
Interesting. Trump ran against a 60yo. But we have fascism because you and others didn’t like the sound of her laugh. But, I know you insist we didn’t nominate her, we only voted for her for VP. I’ll be waiting for more pretzel logic.
Think a little harder. That 60 yr old was a last minute replacement nominee of a very unpopular elderly incumbent who had his campaign for a second term collapse on him just a few months prior to Election Day. The incumbent party loses 100 times out of 100 in this situation; even against an opponent as weak as Trump. You can try all you want to point fingers at Harris but the 2024 campaign debacle was 100% the fault of Biden and the idiots that supported his nomination in 2020.
Anonymous wrote:Trump and MAGA are heading us into an era of full on women oppression. Why aren’t all women - both Dem and Rep - speaking up? Do women refuse to believe that this is happening? Soon we won’t be permitted to drive or have our own bank account. Why are we just watching this happen??
Anonymous wrote:I actually think it would be a good use of money (for some private org / charity) to help folks apply for and pay for passports. I know the fee is nothing to posters on here but $130 could be a barrier to entry for some.