Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just this viral folder photo, it was her looking so pathetic and weak the entire time. Would Pelosi, AOC, Newsom or Shapiro beg not to be photographed, folder to face, and then stand there super awkwardly while trying to place nice with this power drunk buffoon? Heck no. They all would kill to be handed such an “ambush” on a silver platter and the opportunity to put Trump in his place face-to-face in front of prestige global outlets in the Oval Office. You can’t buy such a priceless golden opportunity. Whitmer blew it.

Ok, you win. Whitmer blew it. She is still clearly a much, much better option for POTUS than the idiot in The White House now and the clown who preceded the current idiot.

DP. Please stop engaging with this obvious troll. They’ve come on here and posted repeatedly with the same lame talking points about how W is a ‘nothing sorority girl’ and she ‘blew it’ and her ‘career is over’. Clearly someone trying to build a story to take Whitmer down. Ignore. Any sane person know this wasn’t a big deal. Let’s move on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Again you are repeating the same talking points. You’re obviously a troll

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think there’s a paid troll on here

Define paid troll. Gov. Whitmer's public relations firm is based in Washington. Safe assumption those gals are on here spinning and floating strategy.

Yeah, no. The paid troll is the anti whitmer poster(s) trying to make a huge story out of this. It’s literally nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Which is it about MTG, Bobert, Noem, Bondi, Haley? I’ll wait.

I’m the PP you quoted. All of the women you listed are worthless idiots. You think I’m some Republican shill? lol. Bless your heart.

So what Dem woman embodies your ideal?

Already listed examples above. There are many Dem female senators and reps who wouldn’t have wilted under the lights as Whitmer did. Liz Cheney would also seize the opportunity. There’s no coming back from this. Gretch was exposed on the biggest stage.

At the rate Trump is ruining GOP chances of victories in upcoming elections, we could nominate the corpse of Lizzie Borden in 2028 and still be in line for an easy victory. Thanks Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Which is it about MTG, Bobert, Noem, Bondi, Haley? I’ll wait.

I’m the PP you quoted. All of the women you listed are worthless idiots. You think I’m some Republican shill? lol. Bless your heart.

So what Dem woman embodies your ideal?

Already listed examples above. There are many Dem female senators and reps who wouldn’t have wilted under the lights as Whitmer did. Liz Cheney would also seize the opportunity. There’s no coming back from this. Gretch was exposed on the biggest stage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just this viral folder photo, it was her looking so pathetic and weak the entire time. Would Pelosi, AOC, Newsom or Shapiro beg not to be photographed, folder to face, and then stand there super awkwardly while trying to place nice with this power drunk buffoon? Heck no. They all would kill to be handed such an “ambush” on a silver platter and the opportunity to put Trump in his place face-to-face in front of prestige global outlets in the Oval Office. You can’t buy such a priceless golden opportunity. Whitmer blew it.

Ok, you win. Whitmer blew it. She is still clearly a much, much better option for POTUS than the idiot in The White House now and the clown who preceded the current idiot.

Trump is term limited.

Yes and thanks to Trump serving up an easy Dem victory in 2028, all we need to focus on is nominating a candidate who will be viable when seeking re-election in 2032 (aka not an 80 year old).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Which is it about MTG, Bobert, Noem, Bondi, Haley? I’ll wait.

I’m the PP you quoted. All of the women you listed are worthless idiots. You think I’m some Republican shill? lol. Bless your heart.

So what Dem woman embodies your ideal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just this viral folder photo, it was her looking so pathetic and weak the entire time. Would Pelosi, AOC, Newsom or Shapiro beg not to be photographed, folder to face, and then stand there super awkwardly while trying to place nice with this power drunk buffoon? Heck no. They all would kill to be handed such an “ambush” on a silver platter and the opportunity to put Trump in his place face-to-face in front of prestige global outlets in the Oval Office. You can’t buy such a priceless golden opportunity. Whitmer blew it.

Ok, you win. Whitmer blew it. She is still clearly a much, much better option for POTUS than the idiot in The White House now and the clown who preceded the current idiot.

Trump is term limited.

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just this viral folder photo, it was her looking so pathetic and weak the entire time. Would Pelosi, AOC, Newsom or Shapiro beg not to be photographed, folder to face, and then stand there super awkwardly while trying to place nice with this power drunk buffoon? Heck no. They all would kill to be handed such an “ambush” on a silver platter and the opportunity to put Trump in his place face-to-face in front of prestige global outlets in the Oval Office. You can’t buy such a priceless golden opportunity. Whitmer blew it.

Ok, you win. Whitmer blew it. She is still clearly a much, much better option for POTUS than the idiot in The White House now and the clown who preceded the current idiot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Which is it about MTG, Bobert, Noem, Bondi, Haley? I’ll wait.

I’m the PP you quoted. All of the women you listed are worthless idiots. You think I’m some Republican shill? lol. Bless your heart.

Imagine Trump’s team trying to ambush Rep. Jasmine Crockett or Ilhan Omar. Both would have seized the opportunity to embarrass his sorry ass.

It wasn’t just this viral folder photo, it was her looking so pathetic and weak the entire time. Would Pelosi, AOC, Newsom or Shapiro beg not to be photographed, folder to face, and then stand there super awkwardly while trying to place nice with this power drunk buffoon? Heck no. They all would kill to be handed such an “ambush” on a silver platter and the opportunity to put Trump in his place face-to-face in front of prestige global outlets in the Oval Office. You can’t buy such a priceless golden opportunity. Whitmer blew it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Ok, no one is saying Whitmer is a generational political talent or anything close to an elite politician but we're talking about the same stupid American voters who were duped into electing Trump and Biden.

If they can be duped into electing those clowns, it won't be difficult to convince them to elect a multi-term governor who is in her prime and clearly more intelligent than the goons we've elected since 2016. Whitmer isn't necessarily our best option for a nominee but she is an obvious example of the type of candidate who should be considered relative to elderly clowns.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

You're talking about Newsom, of coruse.

I just don't understand the bizarre attempted character assassination via narrative fabrication, with Democrats saying that it so sad that everyone hates her for this even though no one outside MAGA is saying they hate her for this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this apparently coordinates attack by center-left people to manufacture outrage over non-event. I expect from the Dijon mustard tan suit Republicans, but I don't understand why the Democrats are doing it to one of their own.

This is like the "Dean Scream" again.

What's the real story? Are the Clintons afraid she'll defeat one of their anointed successors in a primary?

This is flirting with Q-anon crazy. The reality is there is no there there. If Dems want to win in 2028, we need a fearless, quick on his or her feet, killer. Whitmer is just not that. Whitmer and her team got crushed in November 2024 and when duped by Trump in April 2025 she exposes herself as some frazzled freshman sorority girl.

Which is it about MTG, Bobert, Noem, Bondi, Haley? I’ll wait.