Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The press person today claimed there was a ton of evidence that she's seen regarding this man. Let's see it.

She is as bad as Baghdad Bob, but he was better at lying.

Her boobs are much perkier though

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The press person today claimed there was a ton of evidence that she's seen regarding this man. Let's see it.

She is as bad as Baghdad Bob, but he was better at lying.

Anonymous wrote:The illegals turned around and went home after Trump said they couldn't get in. If they were legitimately seeking asylum, why are they returning?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

It’s not illegal to cross the border without documentation if you’re seeking asylum. He sought asylum and it was eventually granted to him.

Also, we want to extend due process to people from other countries because our citizens travel too and we want our citizens treated fairly by other countries. Due process protects ALL OF US.

Asylum is BS and everyone knows it. They all say they are fleeing gangs, and then those gangs set up shop here. So someone's lying.

Also due process only remains for career criminals and illegals now, so no one cares anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

It’s not illegal to cross the border without documentation if you’re seeking asylum. He sought asylum and it was eventually granted to him.

Also, we want to extend due process to people from other countries because our citizens travel too and we want our citizens treated fairly by other countries. Due process protects ALL OF US.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

He has temporary status. He wasn't in the US illegally.

Everyone claims TPS! It's a loophole that has closed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

He has temporary status. He wasn't in the US illegally.

Everyone claims TPS! It's a loophole that has closed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

He has temporary status. He wasn't in the US illegally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.

For you, the cruelty seems to be the point. You know very well that the reason we want to give accused people due process here in the US before sending them to 3rd world countries is that they will not receive due process once they get there. El Salvador is notorious for this.

Essentially, this man is at risk of spending the rest of his (short) life in an inhumane prison known to violate practically every human right, when no country has ever shown he's violent, or belongs to a gang, or has done anything wrong except to cross a border illegally.

So for you the question is this: do you think a non-violent but illegal border crossing merits such a terrible punishment?

It's as if you were sent to a US supermax for getting a speeding ticket, PP. Do you think that's fair?

Anonymous wrote:The press person today claimed there was a ton of evidence that she's seen regarding this man. Let's see it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can a judge just make this guy undeportable?

Because after a 2-day hearing a judge issued an order. It's the law. Don't like it, then change the law. But stop violating it.

On October 10, 2019, Plaintiff Abrego Garcia was granted withholding of removal
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1232(b)(3)(A), after the immigration judge agreed that he had established
it was more likely than not that he would be persecuted by gangs in El Salvador because of a
protected ground.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.0.pdf

It's pretty obvious that judges don't work for American interests, so it's good to see them ignored.

An El Salvadoran got sent to El Salvador and people are freaking out.

They’re not freaking out that he’s in El Salvador; they’re freaking out that due to an error, a man was served up to El Salvadoran gangs on a silver platter, based on the flimsiest of evidence — and he’s likely just the first case we know of, but not the only case where this has happened. And our government hasn’t figured out how to right this wrong. Would you like your son being incarcerated in a maximum security prison without a trial?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was due for removal anyways and he is back at his home country. What's the problem? His own govt can handle it.

Was he indeed due for removal? Can you explain or provide a cite (or pt me to the article) . If so, I don’t have a problem. I tried to explain to my husband that most people who came and started working and settled unofficially knew this day was coming . I don’t know about this particular case

My super liberal friends hate it when I say things like that. But it’s true

He did not have a removal order. An immigration judge determined he was a danger to the community. Biden sat on the case and never did his asylum hearing.

The administration did not say he could not be brought back, but that judges cannot bring him back.
The administration should demonstrate they are in charge, by bringing him back, then going through the regular process, then deport him to El Salvador, where Bukele will send him back to the same prison for being a gang member.

He won protection from removal in 2019. I believe Trump was the then president.

TPS for El Salvador has been rescinded since 1/2025 so unless he has a green card he may be deported

But there’s a world of difference between sending him back to El Salvador to live free because the gangs have been incarcerated versus incarcerating him WITH the gang members who present a threat to him.

So el salvador can figure it out? He got a free plane ride.