Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even before he announced he was going to run for mayor of New York City, I had long thought that Cuomo is a dark horse for 2028. He has the tough guy persona and charisma that Democrats are completely lacking right now. He also has great political instincts and is not going to hitch his wagon to any unpopular, unworkable ideology for the sake of purity.

I know he was Me Tooed out of office and I thought he deserved that. I am not even going to touch the pandemic issues. But right now, today, leaving aside personal dislike of the man, I think he could win over swing voters. I also think he could help Democrats address the male voter problem. He is probably the only male Democrat right now who embodies the virile man's man and isn't faking it unconvincingly.

Can anyone picture JD Vance or even prime 2016 Trump getting the last word on Cuomo in a debate?

Thoughts?

Cuomo would be over 70 years old if starting a first POTUS term in 2029. Have we not yet learned our lesson regarding the inherent risks of electing 1st term presidents over the age of 70?

Do you have an ideal age range in mind?

45 to 65 is an age range where we've found our most qualified, prepared and fit leaders. It's possible for an individual to be qualified and prepared to serve as POTUS a few years before the age of 45 and it's possible to assume someone to be mentally and physically fit enough to serve as POTUS a few years after the age of 65.

No way in heck is an individual who would be starting a 1st term as POTUS at an age over 70 our best option in a very powerful country of 340 million people.

Just stop boxing us in.

Suggesting that 45-65 is the likely age range for where we'll find the most fit and qualified candidates to serve as leaders of the most powerful country in the world is a simple common sense conclusion based on human science and historical reference. This doesn't mean there should be a box eliminating someone 42 yrs old or 68 yrs old from consideration.

Suggesting that someone the age of 35 or the age of 80 is just as likely to be as fit and qualified as those in the 45 to 65 age range is complete nonsense.

Brief assessment of our three oldest presidents... Reagan- family and former staff have acknowledged the impacts of early stage dementia during his second term. Biden- disastrous final year in office that led to fair questions regarding his mental health and a collapse of his re-election campaign that gifted a second term to our worst president ever. Trump- worst president ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even before he announced he was going to run for mayor of New York City, I had long thought that Cuomo is a dark horse for 2028. He has the tough guy persona and charisma that Democrats are completely lacking right now. He also has great political instincts and is not going to hitch his wagon to any unpopular, unworkable ideology for the sake of purity.

I know he was Me Tooed out of office and I thought he deserved that. I am not even going to touch the pandemic issues. But right now, today, leaving aside personal dislike of the man, I think he could win over swing voters. I also think he could help Democrats address the male voter problem. He is probably the only male Democrat right now who embodies the virile man's man and isn't faking it unconvincingly.

Can anyone picture JD Vance or even prime 2016 Trump getting the last word on Cuomo in a debate?

Thoughts?

Cuomo would be over 70 years old if starting a first POTUS term in 2029. Have we not yet learned our lesson regarding the inherent risks of electing 1st term presidents over the age of 70?

Do you have an ideal age range in mind?

45 to 65 is an age range where we've found our most qualified, prepared and fit leaders. It's possible for an individual to be qualified and prepared to serve as POTUS a few years before the age of 45 and it's possible to assume someone to be mentally and physically fit enough to serve as POTUS a few years after the age of 65.

No way in heck is an individual who would be starting a 1st term as POTUS at an age over 70 our best option in a very powerful country of 340 million people.

Just stop boxing us in.

Ossoff 2028!

Listen to the "Georgia will bow to no king speech" and to his exchange with Ratcliffe.

We need a leader!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even before he announced he was going to run for mayor of New York City, I had long thought that Cuomo is a dark horse for 2028. He has the tough guy persona and charisma that Democrats are completely lacking right now. He also has great political instincts and is not going to hitch his wagon to any unpopular, unworkable ideology for the sake of purity.

I know he was Me Tooed out of office and I thought he deserved that. I am not even going to touch the pandemic issues. But right now, today, leaving aside personal dislike of the man, I think he could win over swing voters. I also think he could help Democrats address the male voter problem. He is probably the only male Democrat right now who embodies the virile man's man and isn't faking it unconvincingly.

Can anyone picture JD Vance or even prime 2016 Trump getting the last word on Cuomo in a debate?

Thoughts?

Cuomo would be over 70 years old if starting a first POTUS term in 2029. Have we not yet learned our lesson regarding the inherent risks of electing 1st term presidents over the age of 70?

Do you have an ideal age range in mind?

45 to 65 is an age range where we've found our most qualified, prepared and fit leaders. It's possible for an individual to be qualified and prepared to serve as POTUS a few years before the age of 45 and it's possible to assume someone to be mentally and physically fit enough to serve as POTUS a few years after the age of 65.

No way in heck is an individual who would be starting a 1st term as POTUS at an age over 70 our best option in a very powerful country of 340 million people.

Have the pierced nipples been exposed?? How do we know he has them. No, I don't want to Google this.

The feces in the streets of San Francisco will always haunt any Newsom campaign. California wildfire management failures ill haunt him too. He should get his nipples pierced like Andrew Cuomo. The at least he’d have more appeal to trans folks.

Dena should have went with Gavin Newsome instead of Kamala. I see you are gearing up for another failed candidate.

Democrats will win easily with any of these characters. We need to stop being picky. I’d like to see Al Franken run as Stuart Smalley. We’re going to need those affirmations in the face of voter revulsion toward our party. “Gosh darnit, people like us.”

Y'all are being picky.
Remember what we are up against....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even before he announced he was going to run for mayor of New York City, I had long thought that Cuomo is a dark horse for 2028. He has the tough guy persona and charisma that Democrats are completely lacking right now. He also has great political instincts and is not going to hitch his wagon to any unpopular, unworkable ideology for the sake of purity.

I know he was Me Tooed out of office and I thought he deserved that. I am not even going to touch the pandemic issues. But right now, today, leaving aside personal dislike of the man, I think he could win over swing voters. I also think he could help Democrats address the male voter problem. He is probably the only male Democrat right now who embodies the virile man's man and isn't faking it unconvincingly.

Can anyone picture JD Vance or even prime 2016 Trump getting the last word on Cuomo in a debate?

Thoughts?

Cuomo would be over 70 years old if starting a first POTUS term in 2029. Have we not yet learned our lesson regarding the inherent risks of electing 1st term presidents over the age of 70?

Do you have an ideal age range in mind?

Anonymous wrote:^ and I like Pete. But he is not our candidate. And it has nothing to do with his sexuality

His strings are easily manipulated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His pierced nipples will certainly endear him to LGBTQIA+ folk.

What kind of old straight man has pierced nipples? A weirdo, that’s who.

S20

Anonymous wrote:Why would anyone want a morally corrupt sex abuser for president? Again?

Well he’s not that so we’re in good shape I guess

^ and I like Pete. But he is not our candidate. And it has nothing to do with his sexuality

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We might need an old white guy to beat back Maga. That is the ugly truth.

Joe Biden did it in 2020 and then Harris could not do it in 2024. Biden never should have run for a second term, but I don't know if a woman could win the presidency and this country regardless. Look how backwards is this country right now.

Republican light Dems aren't going to win back anything.

Nor are the progressive “migrants and trans folk” Democrats. We’re kinda stuck. Only Buttigieg can bring the two halves of our party together. He’s got centrist policies with a progressive identity.

DP. Omfg STFU about Buttigieg. Sure, he’s smart and well spoken but he’s a classic slick coastal politician type and that is NOT what we need. Just stop with the mayor Pete nonsense. Your DC area opinion doesn’t count btw

Uh, excuse me, he’s midwestern. I get that no-one is attracted to Pete like some are to Cuomo. But he’s one of our very best options. Almost all the other names in the list are worse.

Pete is not a true midwestern and you know it. If you think he is, then you haven’t spent much time in the Midwest. He is a hyper ambitious, hyper educated coastal elite type and we don’t ever ever seem to learn our lesson