Anonymous wrote:Healthy food already is relatively more affordable than processed food.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To those supporting bans on processed foods, I don't understand your reasoning.
1. Not all processed foods are the same. If you believe something should be banned you have to clearly define what it is that everyone knows exactly what you are referring to.
2. Then if you're going to ban something you have to make a valid case for why it should be banned, and provide supporting evidence that such foods are harmful.
3. You have to take into account the unintended consequences of such bans. By doing so you open the possibility of black markets, and organized crime such that we see with prohibition and the war on drugs.
4. Also lets not forget that by taking away things people enjoy responsibly is kind of F'd up. Alls I'm saying.
We will get to the point where you can't buy a Twinkie, but you could buy a pack of cigarettes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To those supporting bans on processed foods, I don't understand your reasoning.
1. Not all processed foods are the same. If you believe something should be banned you have to clearly define what it is that everyone knows exactly what you are referring to.
2. Then if you're going to ban something you have to make a valid case for why it should be banned, and provide supporting evidence that such foods are harmful.
3. You have to take into account the unintended consequences of such bans. By doing so you open the possibility of black markets, and organized crime such that we see with prohibition and the war on drugs.
4. Also lets not forget that by taking away things people enjoy responsibly is kind of F'd up. Alls I'm saying.
We will get to the point where you can't buy a Twinkie, but you could buy a pack of cigarettes.
Anonymous wrote:Yes 100 percent. The food in the US is crap. Everyone is getting sick!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Define “processed food”.
This. Pasta? Bread? Cakes? Corn flakes? Canned pasta? Chips? Snacks? Goldfish / graham crackers / marshmallows?
Which of these do you think should be subject to additional taxes?
All these are processed. I wouldn’t support selective taxing of food.
Anonymous wrote:Why not incentivize healthy eating instead? Lower the cost of health insurance for those who eat healthier and exercise regularly. Provide better education. I also like subsidies, but if we're going to have them, subsidize produce so that everyone can afford it. Have you seen these prices lately?
Anonymous wrote:To those supporting bans on processed foods, I don't understand your reasoning.
1. Not all processed foods are the same. If you believe something should be banned you have to clearly define what it is that everyone knows exactly what you are referring to.
2. Then if you're going to ban something you have to make a valid case for why it should be banned, and provide supporting evidence that such foods are harmful.
3. You have to take into account the unintended consequences of such bans. By doing so you open the possibility of black markets, and organized crime such that we see with prohibition and the war on drugs.
4. Also lets not forget that by taking away things people enjoy responsibly is kind of F'd up. Alls I'm saying.
Anonymous wrote:Look it’s pretty clear op is talking about ultra processed food, which we all know is terrible for you. Not sure why some people are being so willfully obtuse.
I would absolutely support some kind of financial incentive to buy healthy, Whole Foods, rather than the crap most people buy.
Anonymous wrote:Look it’s pretty clear op is talking about ultra processed food, which we all know is terrible for you. Not sure why some people are being so willfully obtuse.
I would absolutely support some kind of financial incentive to buy healthy, Whole Foods, rather than the crap most people buy.
Anonymous wrote:This would never happen, Trump loves a Big Mac too much to cancel it.