Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have the receipts now. Isn’t life grand?!

https://doge.gov/savings

Ok let’s break it down. This is certainly not in my wheelhouse, but I try to look at the big picture instead of basing everything off a scary-looking screen grab.

So, I went to a pearl-clutch-inducing contract for $25m with USDA for DEIA assessment/training. Upon closer look, the contract is *up to* $25m over a 5-year period. I think that this does not mean that they have or will get paid the whole amount. It is a blanket purchase agreement. Looking at the “receipts” it appears that maybe none of it has been paid out..?

Again, I am no expert on this, so hopefully someone better qualified than I am will come along and explain.

I did not see the receipts for Elon’s $20 billion in government contracts. Did I miss that? Can you share that link?

You’re not reading this wrong. They are posting things like this because they know lots of people will FAIL to do their necessary research to see what each of these contracts really are. And when people ask substantive questions and in depth investigation (like what is done in a real audit) then they will deflect.

Simple put all they are doing is cancelling contracts that haven’t started payment yet, or using some truly questionable criteria to put others on the chopping block.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DOGE works for The President of the United States of America, you know, the person who WON the last election.

Why aren’t you finding anyone who can win NEXT time?

Ok so you just think the potus is always right and can do whatever they want? Was this your response every time someone criticized Biden?

The president works for us. We do not work for him.

If you work in the Executive Branch of Federal Government he’s kind of your boss. The American People elected him to do the very job he’s doing. If you didn’t like him you should’ve found someone better than a unintelligent Boomer to run against him.

So…again…is this how you felt over the past four years?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have the receipts now. Isn’t life grand?!

https://doge.gov/savings

Ok let’s break it down. This is certainly not in my wheelhouse, but I try to look at the big picture instead of basing everything off a scary-looking screen grab.

So, I went to a pearl-clutch-inducing contract for $25m with USDA for DEIA assessment/training. Upon closer look, the contract is *up to* $25m over a 5-year period. I think that this does not mean that they have or will get paid the whole amount. It is a blanket purchase agreement. Looking at the “receipts” it appears that maybe none of it has been paid out..?

Again, I am no expert on this, so hopefully someone better qualified than I am will come along and explain.

I did not see the receipts for Elon’s $20 billion in government contracts. Did I miss that? Can you share that link?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And another! This is insanity! No wonder we’re practically bankrupt.

TIMOTHY J LONDAGIN, LLC
$25,000,000
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY (DEIA) ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING SERVICES

Have you even looked up what these folks do or are you just posting the DOGE site info here as thought we can’t go there ourselves? Also, does the contract say DEIA or is that what DOGE told you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DOGE works for The President of the United States of America, you know, the person who WON the last election.

Why aren’t you finding anyone who can win NEXT time?

Ok so you just think the potus is always right and can do whatever they want? Was this your response every time someone criticized Biden?

The president works for us. We do not work for him.

If you work in the Executive Branch of Federal Government he’s kind of your boss. The American People elected him to do the very job he’s doing. If you didn’t like him you should’ve found someone better than a unintelligent Boomer to run against him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have the receipts now. Isn’t life grand?!

https://doge.gov/savings

Ok let’s break it down. This is certainly not in my wheelhouse, but I try to look at the big picture instead of basing everything off a scary-looking screen grab.

So, I went to a pearl-clutch-inducing contract for $25m with USDA for DEIA assessment/training. Upon closer look, the contract is *up to* $25m over a 5-year period. I think that this does not mean that they have or will get paid the whole amount. It is a blanket purchase agreement. Looking at the “receipts” it appears that maybe none of it has been paid out..?

Again, I am no expert on this, so hopefully someone better qualified than I am will come along and explain.

I did not see the receipts for Elon’s $20 billion in government contracts. Did I miss that? Can you share that link?

Anonymous wrote:And another! This is insanity! No wonder we’re practically bankrupt.

TIMOTHY J LONDAGIN, LLC
$25,000,000
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY (DEIA) ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING SERVICES

Anonymous wrote:We have the receipts now. Isn’t life grand?!

https://doge.gov/savings

Anonymous wrote:And another! This is insanity! No wonder we’re practically bankrupt.

TIMOTHY J LONDAGIN, LLC
$25,000,000
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY (DEIA) ASSESSMENT AND TRAINING SERVICES

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have the receipts now. Isn’t life grand?!

https://doge.gov/savings

People should read through the actual contracts of said “receipts” not just the screen shots. See how program support, data analytics, and more was cut. They also duplicate contracts to make it seem like they found a bunch of something. Clearly they just used keywords and have no real idea what most of these contracts do or support in any agency. It’s going to be real interesting when people who remain are stymied in doing their work or it takes longer because of this mess.

Oh, and the contracts haven’t actually been stopped just posted on the website.

I mean

It's working for that they want. Critical thinking is not their supporters' strength