Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My contract was terminated today.
I am cutting off everyone in my life who voted for Trump.
I am so sorry to hear this. My spouse is with ICF (USAID contractor) and we are just waiting to be cut.
I worked at usaid as a software developer contractor and noticed all the work was supporting bullshit , after a year I left. I was like who would continue to fund this worthless stuff
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DOGE heads to the pentagon:
https://www.barrons.com/articles/elon-musk-doge-pentagon-defense-stocks-cc533168
*standing golf clap*
Anonymous wrote:DOGE heads to the pentagon:
https://www.barrons.com/articles/elon-musk-doge-pentagon-defense-stocks-cc533168
Anonymous wrote:Why do you say this?Anonymous wrote:Please shut down Accenture
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you say Deloitte ?
I can't speak for Deloitte, but can confirm EY has lost contracts.
To the poster above, I'd think Leidos would be less impacted, aren't they almost exclusively defense contracting?
Leidos has contracts in almost every federal agency. Doge’s goal is to disrupt the DC prime IT contractors to allow for Silicon Valley to come in. They will most certainly take a hit in time.
Don't the prime contractors have extensive operations all over the country, including in Red states?
I am just having a hard time understanding how folks in congress would be in favor of replacing companies that employ their constituents with companies that still primarily employ people in blue areas and with still 80%+ liberal workforces.
I think Congress is about to get a lesson in how government contracts, bases, and field offices benefit their constituents. Some undoubtedly already know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you say Deloitte ?
I can't speak for Deloitte, but can confirm EY has lost contracts.
To the poster above, I'd think Leidos would be less impacted, aren't they almost exclusively defense contracting?
Leidos has contracts in almost every federal agency. Doge’s goal is to disrupt the DC prime IT contractors to allow for Silicon Valley to come in. They will most certainly take a hit in time.
Don't the prime contractors have extensive operations all over the country, including in Red states?
I am just having a hard time understanding how folks in congress would be in favor of replacing companies that employ their constituents with companies that still primarily employ people in blue areas and with still 80%+ liberal workforces.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These fools have no idea what they’re about to do to the local economy. None.
And all the 8as gleefully rubbing their hands at the work they think they’re about to get… 8a is basically DEI.
The richest guy in the world has no idea what he's doing to the economy?
#1 - It reduces government spending, thus reducing inflation.
#2 - It reduces the abundant waste of DC, therefore, housing in DC will become a lot more affordable.
#3 - LOL at people that take money from the government and think they're important.
WTH is 3? You mean people getting SSA, Medicare, SNAP, WIC? They’re taking money from govt. LOL indeed. But, but, that’s not what you meant right?![]()
Anonymous wrote:The govt does not go directly to these companies because they don’t want it found out they are major stockholders or part owners of these companies.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tech sales to government is also screwed. Resellers especially.
Hilarious in that I work for one of these companies and they were all so excited when Trump won. I never understood why the government wouldn’t just go directly to the hardware/software companies directly.
Appearance of not having your hand in the cookie jar is everything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These fools have no idea what they’re about to do to the local economy. None.
And all the 8as gleefully rubbing their hands at the work they think they’re about to get… 8a is basically DEI.
The richest guy in the world has no idea what he's doing to the economy?
#1 - It reduces government spending, thus reducing inflation.
#2 - It reduces the abundant waste of DC, therefore, housing in DC will become a lot more affordable.
#3 - LOL at people that take money from the government and think they're important.
Anonymous wrote:MOVE IT TO THE POLITICS FORUM FOR THE LOVE OF GOD
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My contract was terminated today.
I am cutting off everyone in my life who voted for Trump.
I am so sorry to hear this. My spouse is with ICF (USAID contractor) and we are just waiting to be cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These fools have no idea what they’re about to do to the local economy. None.
And all the 8as gleefully rubbing their hands at the work they think they’re about to get… 8a is basically DEI.
The richest guy in the world has no idea what he's doing to the economy?
#1 - It reduces government spending, thus reducing inflation.
#2 - It reduces the abundant waste of DC, therefore, housing in DC will become a lot more affordable.
#3 - LOL at people that take money from the government and think they're important.
? sorry, how does reducing government spending reduce inflation?
Yes but there will be lots of consolidation work. However selling over priced liberal news subscriptions for 10k a year per person is going to stop
Anonymous wrote:DOGE heads to the pentagon:
https://www.barrons.com/articles/elon-musk-doge-pentagon-defense-stocks-cc533168