Anonymous wrote:I read all of the Jackie Collins books when I was in MS. Not sure how I got them, but knew they were "bad" because I recall slouching down in my seat on the school bus and reading the book inside of a large history or science book. Probably why I became so promiscuous as a teen
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm with all of you 80's kids. I read Danielle Steele, Jackie Collins, Judith Krantz, Judy Blume and Sidney Sheldon. I remeber reading Flowers in the Attic but I don't think I read V.C. Andrews much beyond that. I was never into Stephen King or other horror, true crime or sci-fi.
I remember my parents trying to keep me away from Forever but we all got ahold of it and read the good parts in late elementary school.
Now imagine your 9th grade English teacher giving everyone a copy of Forever and announcing that the literature unit for the next six weeks will be crafted around this book and exploring “sometimes uncomfortable” themes.
This is basically how it is now.
They just send an email to notify parents that the book contains “sexually explicit content” and if the parent wants to, they can request alternative literature that does NOT contain sexually explicit content.
Let that sink in.
The teachers are telling us that their default is choosing literature that contains sexually-explicit material.
You must make a special *request* if you do NOT want sexually-explicit literature introduced to your child in the classroom.
Wild.
Anonymous wrote:Erica Jong’s Fear of Flying.
I may be older than a lot of you.
Anonymous wrote:I read American Psycho when I was 12 because my visiting uncle had brought it and left it in the guest room.
Oh my god, it messed me up. For those of you have only seen the movie and not read the book, the book makes the movie look like a Hallmark film. It is narrated in the first person, with detailed descriptions of rape and torture.
I was horrified but could not stop reading it. My mom was FURIOUS at my uncle when she found it in my room and thumbed through it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember to opt your kids out of Grapes of Wrath. Lots of trauma and a woman breast feeds a man at the end. (sorry to ruin it).
Trauma? It was reflective of actual historical events.
And the ending scene had absolutely nothing sexual about it - a malnourished man was on his death bed and a woman unselfishly decided to nourish him to save his life.
Maybe you should go back and re read it.
DP. I had assumed this was PP’s way of throwing shade around those complained about the recent books being taught in English class.
This is the books thread. Are you always so literal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m 50 and have multiple older sisters who left stuff laying around which I devoured.
+1 to VC Andrews - I read ALL of them - there are like five different series essentially telling the same brother-sister love story in different settings over and over.
+1 to early Jackie Collins
A book called Celebrity where in the first chapter three young men commit rape
Historical romance novels, particularly Kathleen E. Woodiwiss
The worst is Letters to the Happy Hooker, not my sisters’ fault but was at my grandparents house because my mother had multiple younger brothers
Oh my gosh yes - the Happy Hooker book! My friend's mom had it and we DEVOURED it in 5th grade.
My grandmother had The Happy Hooker on her nightstand, but it was wrapped in a paper garbage bag, like we used to put on our textbooks back in the olden days. I just had to see what was under there! It was quite enlightening.![]()