Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people do you actually think will take it? 1% maybe 2?
Supposedly their target is 5%+
It's not going to be anywhere close to that. This is an awful arrangement for the employee. The government can't uphold a contract with illegal terms.
Anonymous wrote:What happens if there is a large percentage (50% or more) who take the federal buy out? All of those jobs just cease to exist? No work gets done at the federal level? Or is everything just optics and the work gets moved to federal contractor companies? That way Trump can say he reduced the federal workforce by 50% and his base is too stupid to realize all the work actually went to federal contractors.
Anonymous wrote:How many people do you actually think will take it? 1% maybe 2?
Don't tell them. Let them go. fafoAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If more than 5% take this deal, I'd be surprised.
-A fed.
Ironically, the one person I know who is considering it is a Trumper. When I mentioned the risks, they had no idea — likely because they watch only one news channel that isn’t talking about the risks.
Anonymous wrote:If more than 5% take this deal, I'd be surprised.
-A fed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many people do you actually think will take it? 1% maybe 2?
Supposedly their target is 5%+
Anonymous wrote:How many people do you actually think will take it? 1% maybe 2?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The "buy out" is an Elon Musk troll. There is a reason you only have until 2/6 to take it, and it's because everyone who takes a deferred resignation will just get let go without pay. Musk is going to then brag about getting rid of the 5-10% laziest feds who thought they would actually get paid to do nothing.
Getting 10% reduction in Fed headcount will absolutely be considered a triumph. Especially if it was voluntary. Assume 7% voluntary buy outs (not uncommon in the private sector) and another 8% involuntary reduction, altogether 15% reduction in workforce. If output does not decrease, it is without question a victory for the Trump administration. Although privately suspect they are looking at more than 15%. Probably 25%.
I listen to a few Democrats and some have said there's fat that can be trimmed in the bureaucracy so you may be surprised by the relatively minimal opposition.
For the millionth time - this is NOT a buy out. It’s an absurdly shady and illusory offer.
It doesn't matter what you think. The terminology being used is quite clear. They're calling it a voluntary buy out because people in the private sector are familiar with the term. Getting hung up over terminology is pedantic. The Administration's goal is clear: they want to reduce the size of the Federal bureaucracy and will do it one way or another.
It doesn't mean all Feds are losing their jobs. Most, in fact, will not. Just like most people didn't lose their jobs during the great recession or any other major recessions. But it's realistic to assume that between the reduction in headcount either by fiat or voluntary, cancellation of unfilled roles and eliminating a significant number of federal spending and projects, there will be overall trimming of the workforce.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What happens if there is a large percentage (50% or more) who take the federal buy out? All of those jobs just cease to exist? No work gets done at the federal level? Or is everything just optics and the work gets moved to federal contractor companies? That way Trump can say he reduced the federal workforce by 50% and his base is too stupid to realize all the work actually went to federal contractors.
1. Few will take it, for a number of reasons.
2. Contractors can't do the work. In my experience only 25 percent of contractors do quality work, and the price for contractors is anywhere from 150 percent to 400 percent more than doing the work in-house.
3. Contractor work isn't free from federal employees. A contract needs project managers and other feds monitoring the work.
Anonymous wrote:To answer your question directly, if a "large percentage" of federal employees take the buyout, we will have confirmation that a "large percentage" of federal employees are blithering idiots.