Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
+1
I do think it's irresponsible of you as a parent especially since you know about the allergy and the kids are good friends, but it's not something a parent should be angry with another parent about at that age.
Not another random parent, no. But a family friend who has known about her kid’s allergy for YEARS is someone she presumably (and with good reason) trusted to keep her kid safe. Probably feels somewhat betrayed by OP.
OP said she has her own problems. Get a grip. Her kid knew what to do.
If your problems make you incapable of safely hosting a child, don’t host.
Your naivete is going to bite you some day. You think your kid is perfectly safe whenever they are in a home not yours? Okay, lady.
No, I don’t think she’s perfectly safe even in my home. That’s not possible for any kid and certainly not for a kid with a serious allergy.
So I only leave her in the care of trusted adults. The kind who would be mortified if they made a mistake like this, not seeking an excuse.
That's the whole point. OP was trusted until she wasn't. Can happen to anyone. Telling people "Fine don't host!" Might make you feel good but it won't help.
I disagree. If you’re taking responsibility for people’s kids, take that seriously. Same goes for closing pool gates, or any other normal response to a known hazard.
If you’re the kind of person who is horrified and mortified for one paragraph and in the second paragraph want to shift the blame to the eleven year old,
please do everyone a favor and don’t host.
You never know what can happen when you drop your kid off somewhere. Just keep rolling those dice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
The world? No. The adults who voluntarily take responsibility for our children knowing they have serious allergies? Absolutely.
And yes, serving a bowl of candy with nuts to a kid with allergies is exactly as irresponsible as leaving a pool gate open when you’ve got toddlers around. Maybe it will be fine! And maybe it really won’t. And either way you have a dead child in your house with no one to blame but yourself.
11 year olds are not the same as toddlers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
The world? No. The adults who voluntarily take responsibility for our children knowing they have serious allergies? Absolutely.
And yes, serving a bowl of candy with nuts to a kid with allergies is exactly as irresponsible as leaving a pool gate open when you’ve got toddlers around. Maybe it will be fine! And maybe it really won’t. And either way you have a dead child in your house with no one to blame but yourself.
11 year olds are not the same as toddlers.
So the doctor who visited Disneyworld, had a lengthy conversation with servers about her allergies, confirmed with them, then had an allergic reaction, administered her epi-pen and had paramedics on the scene, and then died of the allergy exposure was “acting like a toddler”?
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/disney-world-food-allergy-death-lawsuit-long-island-doctor/
Or did negligence from the people who were supposed to keep her safe—the staff who talked with her and confirmed about allergens—fail?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So he saw the candy, knew not to eat it, didn't eat it and went home to cry to Mommy that you had nuts in your house? This really happened?
The kid is 11. I could see mine making just an off handed comment like "yeah it was a ton of fun but I couldn't eat the candy during the movie because it had nuts in it". Not complaining or crying, just a comment because he was a little disappointed. Certainly not thinking I would make a big deal out of it.
If you've known them for years, I don't think they need to remind you of the allergy. But I don't think she should have reamed you out either. You said things have smoothed over now. So you can either choose to let this go or let it bother you to the point it impacts your friendship.
OPs friend should tell her kid that other people may have nuts in their homes. They don't have to throw out everything with nuts just because he's coming over. Wrapped candies that are clearly labeled such as "Snickers" are not a huge risk. OP didn't make a birthday cake with nuts, slice and serve it him. That would be different. But the kid needs to be aware that other people don't live in nut free homes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
The world? No. The adults who voluntarily take responsibility for our children knowing they have serious allergies? Absolutely.
And yes, serving a bowl of candy with nuts to a kid with allergies is exactly as irresponsible as leaving a pool gate open when you’ve got toddlers around. Maybe it will be fine! And maybe it really won’t. And either way you have a dead child in your house with no one to blame but yourself.
11 year olds are not the same as toddlers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
The world? No. The adults who voluntarily take responsibility for our children knowing they have serious allergies? Absolutely.
And yes, serving a bowl of candy with nuts to a kid with allergies is exactly as irresponsible as leaving a pool gate open when you’ve got toddlers around. Maybe it will be fine! And maybe it really won’t. And either way you have a dead child in your house with no one to blame but yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
The world? No. The adults who voluntarily take responsibility for our children knowing they have serious allergies? Absolutely.
And yes, serving a bowl of candy with nuts to a kid with allergies is exactly as irresponsible as leaving a pool gate open when you’ve got toddlers around. Maybe it will be fine! And maybe it really won’t. And either way you have a dead child in your house with no one to blame but yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
+1
I do think it's irresponsible of you as a parent especially since you know about the allergy and the kids are good friends, but it's not something a parent should be angry with another parent about at that age.
Not another random parent, no. But a family friend who has known about her kid’s allergy for YEARS is someone she presumably (and with good reason) trusted to keep her kid safe. Probably feels somewhat betrayed by OP.
OP said she has her own problems. Get a grip. Her kid knew what to do.
If your problems make you incapable of safely hosting a child, don’t host.
Your naivete is going to bite you some day. You think your kid is perfectly safe whenever they are in a home not yours? Okay, lady.
No, I don’t think she’s perfectly safe even in my home. That’s not possible for any kid and certainly not for a kid with a serious allergy.
So I only leave her in the care of trusted adults. The kind who would be mortified if they made a mistake like this, not seeking an excuse.
That's the whole point. OP was trusted until she wasn't. Can happen to anyone. Telling people "Fine don't host!" Might make you feel good but it won't help.
NP. That’s not what happened. What happened is someone literally asked “what would make your kid feel safe in my home,” a parent whose kid has a nut allergy answered with clear instructions, and then the poster rudely said “that’s too much, we won’t invite you.”
THAT is the response that warrants a “fine, don’t host.” Any decent person would say, “That’s all good to know, and it will help me talk to the parents and make a plan for their kid to come over.” And that would warrant a “Thank you!”
No shit Sherlock. I said I wouldn't host with those rules no need to be like "fine!" Nobody actually does any of that anyway, that PP is trolling.
Anonymous wrote:Closing a pool gate when toddlers are around is not the same thing as a bowl of wrapped candy bars, some of which contain nuts, to a group of 11 year olds!
Parents who think the world is responsible for their kid with nut allergies would be better never leaving their side.
Anonymous wrote:I goofed. 11DS has a friend allergic to nuts, which I’ve known for years. He’s been to our home and we’ve been out to dinner with them, although it’s been a while. From a young age, he has been diligent about avoiding nuts.
Recently, my teenage DD was diagnosed with her own severe allergy, which has thrown me for a loop. In all the chaos, I totally spaced out when planning DS’s birthday party. I bought a big bag of mixed wrapped candy bars for the boys to eat while watching a movie, not realizing one of the brands has nuts in it. The allergic kid knew not to eat it, although the other boys ate it, but he didn’t say anything to me or anyone.
The next day I got a nasty text from my friend, wondering why I had served candy with nuts when it was so upsetting to her son. I was mortified, admitted I had been completely preoccupied lately and had simply forgotten his nut allergy since I hadn’t seen him in a while. I apologized profusely and things seem smoothed over for now.
Not only do I feel bad for upsetting her son, I’m also wondering if it was her or her son’s responsibility to remind me of the allergy before the party and not ream me out by text. I’m embarrassed for the slip-up but also feel she went overboard with the nastygram. WWYD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
+1
I do think it's irresponsible of you as a parent especially since you know about the allergy and the kids are good friends, but it's not something a parent should be angry with another parent about at that age.
Not another random parent, no. But a family friend who has known about her kid’s allergy for YEARS is someone she presumably (and with good reason) trusted to keep her kid safe. Probably feels somewhat betrayed by OP.
OP said she has her own problems. Get a grip. Her kid knew what to do.
If your problems make you incapable of safely hosting a child, don’t host.
Your naivete is going to bite you some day. You think your kid is perfectly safe whenever they are in a home not yours? Okay, lady.
No, I don’t think she’s perfectly safe even in my home. That’s not possible for any kid and certainly not for a kid with a serious allergy.
So I only leave her in the care of trusted adults. The kind who would be mortified if they made a mistake like this, not seeking an excuse.
That's the whole point. OP was trusted until she wasn't. Can happen to anyone. Telling people "Fine don't host!" Might make you feel good but it won't help.
NP. That’s not what happened. What happened is someone literally asked “what would make your kid feel safe in my home,” a parent whose kid has a nut allergy answered with clear instructions, and then the poster rudely said “that’s too much, we won’t invite you.”
THAT is the response that warrants a “fine, don’t host.” Any decent person would say, “That’s all good to know, and it will help me talk to the parents and make a plan for their kid to come over.” And that would warrant a “Thank you!”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This can’t be a true story when 11yos are involved. If true, your friend is way out of line. There are nuts in the world and an 11 yo is old enough to navigate that.
Not buying it. Our prolific troll is back.