Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you have some real wild fantasies about what all of this means. Your dreams have not come true the last 10 years. Everything has failed and now Trump will be POTUS again on J20. Just accept it without calling people low IQ, all of you are the one's that look like low IQ idiots.
I don't know about your IQ but I do know that you voted for a man with no moral compass, no code of ethics, that you condone his specious business practices, his sexual promiscuity as well as rape.
Anonymous wrote:A GW Law professor called this election the biggest jury verdict ever. He’s being legally correct while being relatable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When will Smith and his staff be arrested? How long will they be held in Guantanamo?
What crime did he commit?
Anonymous wrote:NP... Magas here trying to pretend like J6 didn't happen / was no big deal is gaslighting at its worst.
Anonymous wrote:When will Smith and his staff be arrested? How long will they be held in Guantanamo?
Anonymous wrote:Some of you have some real wild fantasies about what all of this means. Your dreams have not come true the last 10 years. Everything has failed and now Trump will be POTUS again on J20. Just accept it without calling people low IQ, all of you are the one's that look like low IQ idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jack Smith is moving that the charges be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE, meaning they can be brought again at a future date.
If he'd waited until after Trump and his DOJ take control, they would be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE and the whole thing would go away.
Don't even try logic with these people. It just doesn't land.
And consistency is not a thing either. It’s all such bad faith. I really hope they are all foreign trolls and not actual Americans.
I think they are regular Americans, just remarkably dumb and amoral.
"This is why you lost" coming in 3, 2, 1...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jack smith should prepare to be bankrupted defending himself
Nah. He can just run for president and then it would be political interference and lawfare to prosecute him.
Will still bankrupt him. He can’t start truth social while being convicted and increase his net worth 4 billion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp
So much for muh J6. Womp womp.
What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?
NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...
It's a very serious and consequential case, but Trumps attorneys were able to deploy legal tactics to delay and delay and delay and run the clock out and now Trump has control of DOJ which he will make sure drops and buries the case. That's what happened, not your goofy town J6 denials.
Nothing serious or consequential about it, that's the point and why it was dropped. No little fantasy that you can dream up can change that. You people are miserable.
J6 is Trump's legacy. That's how he'll be remembered.
Nah. The purpose of all these impeachments and criminal charges was to attach these to him to forever brand him and his supporters as losers. But he won, which shows how none of it mattered (and has convinced a lot of neutrals he was right about the COVID election mail-in fraud after all), and now cases will be quietly dropped. It's the biggest comeback in political history.
That's not how history works. January 6th has its own section on his Wikipedia page for example. This is his legacy.
And that wikipedia page will say that the charges against Trump were dropped when Trump was re-elected President.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some of you have some real wild fantasies about what all of this means. Your dreams have not come true the last 10 years. Everything has failed and now Trump will be POTUS again on J20. Just accept it without calling people low IQ, all of you are the one's that look like low IQ idiots.
Everybody HAS accepted it. This is the beginning of the end for Trump. Every day that goes by is one day closer to him being out of politics forever. Throughout, J6 will be his defining legacy. There has never been a day in the US like it. There will hopefully never be one again. J6 will forever be associated with Trump.
No, it won't and deep down you know it. If it mattered he would not be only the second POTUS in history to serve two non-consecutive terms. You can bellow about J6 all you want, it was not an insurrection and certainly not caused by Trump.
Who is bellowing? We all know he is an insurrectionist. Yes, it was a stupid insurrection that would never have worked, even if everything had happened the way they wanted. That doesn't mean it didn't happen. It just means he is a stupid insurrectionist.
Well his ultimate goal of the so-called insurrection was to have another term as President, which he got.
You don't see the difference of "getting" it through J6 versus an election? Yes, he was reelected. No, he didn't get to beat us over the head as a nation and demand it.
Man, you J6 deniers are something else.
Let me ask you something - is there anything he could ever do that you would take issue with? Anything at all?
Calm TF down.
I am calmly stating facts. Is there anything he could ever do that you would take issue with? Anything at all? Name one thing he could do that you would say "that's not right."
Nothing. They will offer up their daughters
You are so sick. Trump broke your brains. You need actual, real, professional, intensive therapy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jack-smith-files-to-drop-jan-6-charges-against-donald-trump/ar-AA1uJuxx?ocid=BingNewsSerp
So much for muh J6. Womp womp.
What point are you trying to make? Did you struggle to spell 'my'?
NP... The point is obvious. If the case was really that important and backed by solid and provable evidence than it should not have been dropped. You know that rule of law thing...