Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGOTs: why are you still so obsessed with her? Shouldn't you put out some constructive ideas now that your man won?

Do you know how to read? Perhaps read before you try insulting people as you have embarrassed yourself.

That person can't think, spell, or read.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
MAGOTs: why are you still so obsessed with her? Shouldn't you put out some constructive ideas now that your man won?

I think you’re confused. Its the democrats asking how she blew through this money and wanting an audit not republicans who never gave her money in the first place.

+1 If true, I don't think Republicans are the ones upset because they thought Oprah genuinely believed in Harris and donated her time bur instead was paid 1 million dollars. .

Anonymous wrote:
MAGOTs: why are you still so obsessed with her? Shouldn't you put out some constructive ideas now that your man won?

Do you know how to read? Perhaps read before you try insulting people as you have embarrassed yourself.

Anonymous wrote:You would think some of these celebs could actually consider donating their time to causes that are supposedly important to them. It’s all grift.

+1

Anonymous wrote:Dem activist in Flint, Michigan says he witnessed all the campaign’s hired local surrogates just stealing the money and not actually doing anything on the ground. Sounds like a grifter free for all.

Michigan Dem activist rips Harris for not focusing on black voters — while relying on ‘fake civil rights leaders’ and ‘corrupt officials’
https://nypost.com/2024/11/07/us-news/michigan-dem-activist-rips-harris-for-not-focusing-on-black-voters-relying-on-fake-civil-rights-leaders-and-corrupt-officials/

That NY Post expose is why the campaign is pleading with staffers to not talk to reporters.

Anonymous wrote:
MAGOTs: why are you still so obsessed with her? Shouldn't you put out some constructive ideas now that your man won?

I think you’re confused. Its the democrats asking how she blew through this money and wanting an audit not republicans who never gave her money in the first place.

MAGOTs: why are you still so obsessed with her? Shouldn't you put out some constructive ideas now that your man won?

Anonymous wrote:She had to pay all th celebrities and pop stars

Highly embarrassing. Dems trying to buy votes again. I heard Alanis Morissette was supposed to do a concert but she "ran out of money" to pay for it. Kamala PAID OPRAH 1 million for the "interview."

Trump didn't pay Elon or Joe or anyone for that matter to support him. In fact Elon donated to Trump.

That's the difference. You shouldn't have to PAY people to support you. Tacky AF.

Dem activist in Flint, Michigan says he witnessed all the campaign’s hired local surrogates just stealing the money and not actually doing anything on the ground. Sounds like a grifter free for all.

https://nypost.com/2024/11/07/us-news/michigan-dem-activist-rips-harris-for-not-focusing-on-black-voters-relying-on-fake-civil-rights-leaders-and-corrupt-officials/

Trump still owes I believe Arizona from 2019

You would think some of these celebs could actually consider donating their time to causes that are supposedly important to them. It’s all grift.

Is there any basis for lawsuits here, by Harris donors? This is gross mismanagement of funds.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:here is the early breakdown, worst run campaign of all time. She spend triple on staff than the trump campaign and dumb ads and paying influencers which resulted in nothing.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-kamala-harris-plowed-through-1-billion/ar-AA1tJR0M?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ASTS&cvid=ca105f3ce36843ab9a085fdfefd4740a&ei=7

Absolutely incredible. They even gave $1M of campaign funds to billionaire Oprah!

This is unbelievable! I thought Opfra was supporting her because she believed in Harris and her historic message.

Paying Opfra $1 million of donated funds to support Harris is akin to bringing coal to Newcastle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One BILLION was her budget? That's shameful to have spent that much money on any campaign, even if she won.

Colgate-Palmolive alone spent around $2.4 billion on advertising worldwide in 2023. Commercial advertising way exceeds political. Why are toothpaste ads more valid? Limiting money spends by campaigns typically hurts challengers and benefits incumbents. Trump, of course, has figured out how to get tons of free airtime with his antics.

Because they use their own money and campaigns beg for donations?

DP - to the OP point in a campaign, you spend where you feel you need. Donors have to accept once you give, that money is the campaigns. It takes a lot of money to do shit now is OP point.

But I agree that the management of these funds is really the issue. But traditionally, the Dems leverage entertainers as the Arts has dominion in a liberal society and I'm all for it.

But I don't believe any amount of money could have fixed Kamala. She just sucked. Her messaging sucked. I think at some point you just stop spending to not go into debt as there were no good options! lol

So, she didn't want to go to LA to film the podcast so they recreated the set of Call Her Daddy in a hotel room in DC and spent 6 figures doing that.
This is where your donations went, folks. To set designs, Hollywood star productions, social influencers, and other ineffective campaign efforts.

Nothing about this campaign was authentic. They worked to fool their followers at every turn. Fake sets, fake interviews, fake candidate.